吃瓜导航🧭 🍉吃瓜,是一种生活态度! 点击下方按钮,订阅你喜欢的!精彩才刚刚开始!给我永不消逝的爱,把底部的“一键订阅”点一下! 🔥关注一下新频道: @CG348 @CG126 @CG12316
👍2

Channel
@CG12304
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
69,571subscribers
+32,120 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003440121003 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CG12304 |
| Description | 🍉吃瓜,是一种生活态度。 🤝广告合作联系 @CG10086_bot 👥也可群里留言 @CG12369 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CG12304 |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
32,800 average views per post against 69,571 subscribers — an engagement rate of 47.1%. Across the 1,273 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,656–99,964 subscribers, posting mainly in Chinese — the middle half sit between 1.03% and 5.76%, with a median of 2.51%.
| Window | 30 days (8 August 2026 – 7 September 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 125 of 125 published in the window (0 exact, 125 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 4,096,270 |
| Mature posts only | 52.8% over 95 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 69,571 measured 6 September 2026 |
| Cohort | b31623:zho · 1,273 channels · p10 0.332% · p25 1.03% · p50 2.51% · p75 5.76% · p90 12.2% |
| Position in cohort | 99.843th percentile · 18.8× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.014% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Chinese · 100.0% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 7 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 04:41 | 69,571 | +2,152 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 01:20 | 67,419 | +1,185 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:03 | 66,234 | +810 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:45 | 65,424 | +755 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:39 | 64,669 | +908 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 63,761 | +1,213 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 62,548 | +2,108 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:56 | 60,440 | +2,258 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:34 | 58,182 | +1,687 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:04 | 56,495 | +868 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:53 | 55,627 | +405 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:08 | 55,222 | +901 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 11:53 | 54,321 | +1,203 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 01:35 | 53,118 | +1,912 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:43 | 51,206 | +2,629 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 22:42 | 48,577 | +989 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 20:48 | 47,588 | +689 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 46,899 | +738 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:16 | 46,161 | +1,211 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 44,950 | first reading |
140 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 127 of 128 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 140 (5 August 2026 – 7 September 2026) |
| Views total | 4,169,960 |
| Reactions total | 3,682 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Sept 2026, 19:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 70 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4,272 reactions across 139 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,744 | 40.8% | |
| 👍 | 598 | 14.0% | |
| 🕊 | 596 | 14.0% | |
| 🤮 | 248 | 5.81% | |
| 🙏 | 231 | 5.41% | |
| 😱 | 163 | 3.82% | |
| 😭 | 91 | 2.13% | |
| 💩 | 87 | 2.04% | |
| 😁 | 84 | 1.97% | |
| 🤡 | 65 | 1.52% | |
| 🤣 | 53 | 1.24% | |
| 👏 | 38 | 0.89% | |
| 🤬 | 38 | 0.89% | |
| 🥰 | 34 | 0.796% | |
| 🐳 | 26 | 0.609% | |
| 👎 | 25 | 0.585% | |
| 🔥 | 20 | 0.468% | |
| 🌚 | 18 | 0.421% | |
| 🫡 | 16 | 0.375% | |
| 🤔 | 14 | 0.328% | |
| 17 further kinds | 83 | 1.94% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 139 of the 140 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,272 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 140 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
吃瓜导航🧭 🍉吃瓜,是一种生活态度! 点击下方按钮,订阅你喜欢的!精彩才刚刚开始!给我永不消逝的爱,把底部的“一键订阅”点一下! 🔥关注一下新频道: @CG348 @CG126 @CG12316
👍2
#南宁火车站 #南宁站跳轨 #跳轨自杀 #卧轨自杀 广西南宁火车站一旅客突然跳轨道与列车碰撞身亡! 📱 谁有视频投稿给我看看怎么回事
❤6😁3
#安娜泡芙 #泡芙 #琪琪 快手主播安娜泡芙 榜一刷礼物塞小玩具,启动键一按当场喷在直播间,真的离谱😂 📱 点击观看女主播喷水视频
❤4
重要:今天9月7日⚽️ #竞彩足球推荐 🔥 比赛球队:乌迪内斯(主)vs 拉齐奥 比赛时间:9月8日 2:45 竞彩编号:006 推荐:拉齐奥赢 竞彩:主+1胜、波胆0:1 滚球:拉齐奥-0/0.5、全场小2.5 比赛球队:埃尔切(主) vs 皇家社会 比赛时间:9月8日 3:30 竞彩编号:008 推荐:埃尔切不败 竞彩:主+1胜、波胆2:2 滚球:埃尔切+0.5、全场大2.5 —————————————————— 🤫🤫🤫🤫:https://t.me/GQ148 😀😀😀😀 足球⚽️、篮球🏀、nba 、cba 、世界杯买球平台!🔥绝对靠谱,可以用💸支付宝💸微信📱存款,📱提款不封卡!群主15年老玩家推荐,台子确实不错,app界面整洁,📱出款快!喜欢买球的可以注册试试!🔗 无法打开显示304关闭vpn重试即可! 😏😏😏😏: 2028vip117.cc
❤7👍1
#唐山抓小三 #滦南上河城抓小三 河北唐山滦南上河城抓小三视频来龙去脉! 📱 谁有视频投稿给我看看怎么回事
❤4
#广西宜州跳楼 #宜州自杀 广西宜州跳楼自杀事件 女的打麻将输钱 没有钱还就给人家睡。男的不知道女的有孩子,觉得自己被骗了!于是萌生了报复的念头,男的出发前在群里发消息称:宜州剌客持刀上线,到麻将管把女的割了!男的割腕自杀躺下没死成,后来又上天台等女的嘎了的消息。看一下手机确认后跳楼自杀了。
❤16🤣5👍3😐1
#亚麻壁纸 #亚麻黄色系壁纸 亚麻壁纸高清无水印没有打码的图片! 📱 点击下载手机壁纸
❤6🥰1
#越南小学生砍人 越南十五岁初中生杀人!卧槽!无差别砍人,杀疯了呀!
🤬21❤11👍10😱4😁2
#湖州西山漾 #湖州 #湖州西山 #车震捉奸 湖州西山漾抓奸视频公公和儿媳妇在车里偷情!
👍23❤18🥰5🕊4
#上海ktv 上海星辉国际ktv陪酒公主喝多了呕吐到底发生了什么? 📱 点击观看更多视频
👍8🕊8❤5🔥1
#科大讯飞 #朱倩 #韩煜尘 我是朱倩老公,这是朱倩出轨的聊天记录截图,已经出轨一年多,多次出去开房,朱倩聊天记录表示还没操够韩煜尘!没有视频,网上的视频都是假的! 📱 点击查看完整聊天记录
❤11🕊3💯2👍1
#惠州水东街 #水东街 惠州水东街疑似发生性侵事件!女的看起来精神不太正常的样子! 📱 点击观看更多视频
❤17🕊5🥱4
Showing the 12 most recent of 140 posts we hold for @CG12304. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@CG12304 edited 10 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“吃瓜群众12304热搜猎奇视频” (@CG12304), 69,571 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CG12304.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.