Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for [NEW ERA] 𝑪𝑯𑣲𝑰 𝑩𝑳𝑰𝑺𝑺 𝑳𝑰𝑭𝑬

Channel

[NEW ERA] 𝑪𝑯𑣲𝑰 𝑩𝑳𝑰𝑺𝑺 𝑳𝑰𝑭𝑬

@CHBL_LIFE

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

60subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002927854066
TypeChannel
Username@CHBL_LIFE
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/CHBL_LIFE

Growth

607165.511 August 2026 — 71 subscribers11 August 2026 — 71 subscribers25 August 2026 — 67 subscribers1 September 2026 — 65 subscribers11 September 2026 — 63 subscribers18 September 2026 — 60 subscribers11 August 202618 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 38 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 58–73 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 11:1660-3
11 Sept 2026, 00:5763-2
1 Sept 2026, 14:0465-2
25 Aug 2026, 03:3967-4
11 Aug 2026, 08:1471no change
11 Aug 2026, 06:3171first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 29 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5314662381123563364457.1%
custom 5316598440711450074342.9%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 15:17 UTC35 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

𝑰𝑵𝑻𝑬𝑹𝑨𝑪𝑻𝑰𝑽𝑬 Важные новости! Хотеи сообщить, что скоро будет проведён интерактив "найди отличие" 𝐑𝐮𝐥𝐞𝐬: в чат флуда отправляются фотографии, задача участников угодать в чем отличие 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐭: Jahoda (@Ebanaya_cucaracha67) 𝐓𝐢𝐦𝐞: 1 августа (суббота) 18:00 по мск 𝐏𝐫𝐢𝐳𝐞: 100 Монет за отгадку #Interactivity_𝑪𝑯𝑩𝑳

16 Jul 2026, 09:01 UTC93 viewsread 11 August 2026

❤️ - 🅰️𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐘𝐮𝐚𝐧 пр, простите меня пожалуйста но.... разрыв со всеми союзами. возможно, когда нибудь ещё будем заключать, но сейчас точно не, и это было ожидаемо. флуд и лайф все еще открыты, но просто теперь без союзов!!! тк желания нет их вести, сорян((( #Schp_𝑪𝑯𝑩𝑳 #Important_𝑪𝑯𝑩𝑳 #Break_Unions_𝑪𝑯𝑩𝑳

30 Jun 2026, 09:28 UTC120 viewsread 11 August 2026

❤️ -🅰️𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐘𝐮𝐚𝐧 не, нью эра не успеет. я уезжаю, так что потерпите ещё пару неделек. #Schp_𝑪𝑯𝑩𝑳

29 Jun 2026, 11:08 UTC92 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Diluk Дорогие админы, знайте героя в лицо, это все я. 💕 #Schp_𝑪𝑯𝑩𝑳

custom 53165984407114500742

29 Jun 2026, 10:35 UTC90 viewsread 11 August 2026

Diluk Давайте юзы, ребят, я всем такое организую #Schp_𝑪𝑯𝑩𝑳

29 Jun 2026, 10:33 UTC69 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🖤 - 🔤apitano Я твое солнце ❤️😍💋❤️‍🔥 Ты моя луна❤️💋😍❤️💋❤️‍🔥 Я твоей любви без ума❤️💋😘💋💋❤️❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥😘💋❤️😘 Молю бога есть ты у меня❤️😘😍💋😍❤️💋💋😘❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥 Жизнь бессмыслена без тебя❤️😍💋😘😍😘❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️😍💋😍❤️😍💋😎😎😎😎 Ведь я тебя очень люблю😘😘😘😘 #Schp_𝑪𝑯𝑩𝑳

custom 53146623811235633641

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @CHBL_LIFE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“[NEW ERA] 𝑪𝑯𑣲𝑰 𝑩𝑳𝑰𝑺𝑺 𝑳𝑰𝑭𝑬” (@CHBL_LIFE), 60 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CHBL_LIFE.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.