AI办公战火未熄,打工人月付1500元“首付” 大厂AI办公产品激战正酣,但最先为这场战争买单的却是普通打工人。有用户月均AI办公支出近1500元,累计花费超9000元,AI订阅正从尝鲜变成职场刚需。 小红书用户louis近两年先后使用过ChatGPT、Claude等近十款AI办公产品,目前月均开销约1500元,累计花费9000多元。她表示,2024年7月首次为ChatGPT付费时只是想试试水,如今账单已覆盖三四个平台会员及按量计费的Token服务。 社交媒体上,晒出AI月度账单的职场人不在少数,有人调侃“工资没涨,AI订阅先涨”。这股风潮也刮进校园,一位中学语文教师称,如今连教案都离不开AI搜索和辅助设计。 打工人账单变大的背后,是大厂加速布局。过去半年,腾讯将WorkBuddy视为重点产品,日活做到百万级;阿里将悟空、MuleRun、Qoder Work三线合并为“千问办公”,8月3日公测;字节直接把飞书产品团队并入…

Channel
中文热点榜|热搜·今日热点·全网
@CNHotPulse
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
868subscribers
-336 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003973854161 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CNHotPulse |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 6 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CNHotPulse |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 18:36 | 868 | -176 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 09:41 | 1,044 | -82 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:55 | 1,126 | -4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:27 | 1,130 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:58 | 1,129 | -46 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:47 | 1,175 | -6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 07:53 | 1,181 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 1,183 | -21 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:02 | 1,204 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:52 | 1,204 | first reading |
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
段永平减持泡泡玛特实为期权交割 段永平所持泡泡玛特仓位从7.65%降至5.55%,引发市场热议,但港交所文件显示,此次变动系期权合约到期履约,并非主动抛售。 8月5日港交所披露权益变动文件显示,7月30日段永平通过H&H International Investment持有的泡泡玛特多头仓位从7.65%降至5.55%,对应减少约2793万股,成交均价每股162.5港元。这是今年5月他举牌泡泡玛特以来,持仓比例首次明显回落。 港交所文件注明变动原因为“交付了根据股本衍生工具须交付的股份或款项”。泡泡玛特方面也对外澄清,本次持股比例下降并非二级市场直接卖出,而是期权合约履约所致。 8月5日晚间,段永平在雪球回应:“就是put expired,部分被call走了。”他解释主要是看跌期权到期影响较大,另有一部分股票在买入时就同步卖出了看涨期权,“可能未来在一定的价格区间我会一直这么做”,并重申“泡泡玛特保险公司开张了”。 8月…
📢 优质频道推荐 1. 加密货币日报|币圈·行情·快讯 2. Bitcoin & Macro — 英文频道·BTC 行情·ETF 流向·宏观 3. 职业规划大师|求职·面试·职场晋升 4. 4K高清影院🎬|高清电影·院线大片·蓝光资源 5. 元宇宙XR前线|VR·AR·头显·Vision Pro 6. iOS 侧载精选|巨魔·免签·解锁应用 7. GRAM生态观察|TON链·钱包·代币动态 8. AI 论文精读|每日精选论文 9. DevOps 实战|K8s·CI/CD·可观测·SRE 10. Hacker News 中文|科技头条 想让你的频道出现在这里?私聊 @pindaotuijianbot 提交申请(免费)
车企牌电池密集上车,动力电池进入“白盒”时代 车企不再满足于简单采购电池,而是以自家名义定义标准、穿透管理供应链,动力电池开发正从“黑盒”走向“白盒”。 7月30日,小米汽车推出“小米龙甲电池”,主打高安全防护,成为其小米澎程车型的核心亮点之一;华为早已推出“巨鲸电池”,并已开放接入多家电池厂商。此外,比亚迪“刀片”、吉利“金砖”等,几乎所有具备规模的整车厂都在传递同一信号:电池不再只是采购装车,而是以车企名义、标准与责任交付用户。 相比直接采购,“车企牌”电池通过深度定义和开发,在防护能力、循环寿命、快充能力等更高性能指标上展开角逐。车企并不一定自造电池,但普遍采取“穿透式管理”,即从电芯到电池包的技术和性能标准全部由车企主导定义,甚至深度参与电芯材料开发,并对核心供应链和生产制造环节全流程介入监管。 过往动力电池合作模式简单,车企提需求、电池厂商负责开发交付。尤其在技术积累深厚的头部供应商合作中,对方常对旗舰产品采用…
携程51.79亿反垄断罚单落地 携程历时7个月的反垄断调查尘埃落定,被处以51.79亿元行政处罚,并责令停止两项违法行为。罚款由违法所得16.58亿元加上按去年境内收入7.5%计算的罚金构成,属互联网平台反垄断领域次顶格处罚。 携程在OTA领域长期一家独大。2014年后,携程陆续成为同程第二大股东、艺龙第一大股东,并合并去哪儿网。OTA市场具有典型的双边规模效应,平台越大、供给越全、价格越低,吸引用户越多,对上游议价能力越强。 此次处罚源于两项滥用市场支配地位行为:一是强制“特牌”酒店独家合作、限制跨平台经营,类似电商“二选一”;二是强制“金牌”和“无牌”酒店提供全网最低价,否则平台出手调价。调价助手、抢票工具等整改覆盖全行业,携程一并完成。 处罚虽重,但未动摇携程“票务引流、酒店赚钱”的商业模式。机票业务利润率一般但能引流,酒店佣金是主要收入来源,佣金率从10%到30%不等。市场最担心的佣金率上限并未出现,整改主要涉及…
办公Agent重组:阿里收权、字节拆飞书、腾讯让WorkBuddy先跑 7月,阿里、字节、腾讯先后调整办公业务组织架构,重新分配模型、入口、企业数据与销售交付的归属。阿里将Qoder Work、悟空、MuleRun整合为千问办公,由钉钉CEO陈宇森负责;字节把飞书产品团队并入豆包,销售交付划给火山引擎;腾讯则让WorkBuddy独立生长,6月PC端月访问量达2097万次,超过第二名与第三名之和。 三家公司都在收拢办公Agent,但路径不同。阿里结束赛马,把权力集中到陈宇森一人手中。7月初,Qoder Work及十余名员工从QTeam划出,与钉钉孵化的悟空、阿里云内部创业项目MuleRun合并,一周内完成办公区迁移。三款产品以Qoder Work为基础整合,命名为千问办公,原有用户权益不受影响。悟空3月17日才发布,仅四个半月后便收拢独立产品路线,后续进入统一千问办公体系。整合最初十分仓促,三款产品底座、用户和团队不同,能力和…
瑞幸狂奔开店,同店销售却连续下滑 瑞幸2026年Q2单季新开2714家门店,总门店数达36310家,创近两年第二高增速。但同店销售额连续第二个季度同比下滑,降幅从上一季度的0.1%扩大至5.3%,门店经营利润率也较去年同期微降。 期内瑞幸营收159亿元,同比增长28.5%;Non-GAAP经营利润23.96亿元,同比增长26.5%。财报公布后股价上涨5.9%。自营门店营收115.64亿元,占总营收73%,同比增长26.6%;联营收入36.68亿元,同比增长27.9%。新开门店中1927家为自营。 同店销售下滑被瑞幸CEO郭谨一归因于去年同期外卖大战的高基数,他表示这一表现符合此前对业务节奏的判断。瑞幸今年Q1调整了同店销售额披露口径,由按季度统计改为按月统计。由于此前已降低9.9元补贴力度,并推出“+3元升级超大杯”,客单价处于上升周期,同店销售下降基本可视为杯量下降。 门店层面利润率为21.3%,同比下降0.2个百分点…
淘宝闪购搜索权收归孟轲,即时零售进入效率战 淘宝闪购完成新一轮组织调整,搜索产品、搜索运营、商品运营三大板块统一划归淘天集团搜索负责人孟轲管理,原多线分头管理局面就此终结。 8月初,据脉脉网友爆料,淘天内部完成关键业务架构变动。原闪购搜索产品负责人思默改向孟轲直接汇报,原归属闪购零售运营负责人君逾麾下、负责搜索及商品运营的相关团队,一并划归孟轲管辖。至此,闪购搜索业务结束分头管理,全部收拢至孟轲统一调度。 孟轲在淘天内部长期深耕流量分发与交易效率。2022年双11,他以淘宝天猫平台营销产品负责人身份操盘大促营销产品落地;2023年升任淘天价格及营销产品负责人后,推动五星价格力体系落地,将百亿补贴、淘宝好价与搜索场景深度绑定。2024年其工作重心转向搜索业务,正式接手淘天搜索板块,期间重点打通种草内容与搜索链路,在当年七夕大促沟通中透露淘宝正测试种草关键词识别,为被种草商家匹配对应搜索流量。 此次调整早有征兆。淘宝闪购由小…
马斯克称AI将取代源代码,业内大佬集体反驳 马斯克在X平台发文称,源代码正在变成下一个汇编语言,下一步将彻底摒弃源代码,让AI直接生成高效的二进制文件。此言一出,软件工程界多位重量级人物接连下场反驳。 这场争论的导火索来自特斯拉前Autopilot深度学习专家James Douma。8月3日他在X上发帖表示,可能再也不会看源代码了,就像半个世纪前停止查看汇编代码一样,现在对AI生成的代码有了同样的信任。马斯克随即转发并补充称,源代码正在变成下一个汇编,下一步是彻底摒弃源代码,直接用AI生成高效的二进制文件。 知名开发者bashbunni率先反讽称,把一切都当黑盒,能出什么错呢。《代码整洁之道》作者Uncle Bob Martin提出建设性方案,建议先让AI生成一种人类不用看、但机器能跨平台一致执行的中间表示作为过渡。UML之父Grady Booch则反驳称,一种有足够表达力、精确、可重复、能产出可执行物的语言,按定义就叫编…
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @CNHotPulse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 45 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@iOSSideloadCN · 244 posts商业科技评论|商业·科技公司·观察
@BizTechCN · 802 posts开发者工具箱|编程·开发工具·资源
@DevToolboxHub · 1,0532 postsGRAM生态观察|TON链·钱包·代币动态
@GramTonWatch · 202 posts纽约时报中文|国际时政·深度·评论
@NYTChineseDaily · 1622 postsAI 论文精读|每日精选论文
@AIPaperCN · 301 post亚美尼亚中文新闻|埃里温·高加索·时事
@ArmeniaChineseHub · 1,0151 post空频道
@CanadaChineseHub · 1,0121 post中文社会热点|社会·民生·舆情
@CNSocialFocus · 9991 postDeFi & Yield|DeFi·Staking·Yield Farming
@DeFiYieldChannel · 1,1101 post效率工具与数字生活|效率工具·数字生活·App推荐
@DigitalLifeToolsCN · 1,0741 post房地产观察|楼市·房价·地产政策
@HouseWatchCN · 9841 postUG环球平台 UG环球真人 环球平台 环球真人
@huanqiu9x · 61 post东京视线|日本新闻
@JapanChineseHub · 1,1221 post斯里兰卡中文新闻|科伦坡·南亚·时事
@LankaChineseHub · 1,0401 post空频道
@MalaysiaChineseCN · 1,1391 post每日沙雕图|梗图·段子·乐子
@MemeDailyCN · 281 post伊朗·中东观察
@MideastWatchCN · 1,0961 post远程项目库|兼职·外包·接单
@RemoteGigsHubCN · 1,0831 post欧博代理 欧博私网 亚星代理 亚星私网
@sdfoood · 2,0461 post东南亚大事件
@SEABreakingNews · 9421 post美国晨报 纽约 加州
@USChineseHub · 1,0441 post空频道
@Web3ProtocolDaily · 1841 post宇宙综合站
@yuantoufx · 2271 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@AIPaperCN · 301 postBitcoin & Macro
@BitcoinMacroCN · 8701 post职业规划大师|求职·面试·职场晋升
@CareerPathCN · 9791 post加密货币日报|币圈·行情·快讯
@CryptoDailyCN · 8381 post空频道
@DevOpsTalkCN · 241 postGRAM生态观察|TON链·钱包·代币动态
@GramTonWatch · 201 postHacker News 中文|科技头条
@HNChineseDaily · 9881 postiOS 侧载精选|巨魔·免签·解锁应用
@iOSSideloadCN · 241 post元宇宙XR前线|VR·AR·头显·Vision Pro
@MetaverseXRCN · 231 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@CNHotPulse named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 25 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“中文热点榜|热搜·今日热点·全网” (@CNHotPulse), 868 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CNHotPulse.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.