Channel
@COVIDEOS_Esp
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,723subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001598506045 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @COVIDEOS_Esp |
| Created | 10 October 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/COVIDEOS_Esp |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 15:41 | 1,723 | -1 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 02:15 | 1,724 | -2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 17:14 | 1,726 | +1 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 08:56 | 1,725 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 1,724 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 13:26 | 1,723 | +4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 05:55 | 1,719 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:56 | 1,718 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:50 | 1,720 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:30 | 1,719 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:20 | 1,719 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 15 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
169 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 59 | 34.9% | |
| ❤ | 39 | 23.1% | |
| 🔥 | 30 | 17.8% | |
| 👏 | 28 | 16.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 3.55% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 2.96% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.592% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.592% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 169 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 15 April 2025 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Antiparasitario reformulado para cáncer En este video del Dr. William Makis explica los beneficios del mebendazol para el cáncer, los mecanismos que ayudan a eliminar las células cancerígenas basados en estudios publicados, explica cómo la industria farmacéutica se basó en el éxito del fenbendazol y creo un medicamento ligeramente parecido, el mebendazol es un antiparasitario para humanos aprobado por la FDA, con po…
❤4
Antiparasitario canino para cáncer En este video del Dr. William Makis habla de los beneficios del fenbendazol para eliminar el cáncer, los mecanismos que ayudan a eliminar las células cancerígenas sustentados en estudios publicados, explica el protocolo de Joe Tippens -quién fue el primer paciente de cáncer terminal en usar el fármaco veterinario antiparasitario-, y explica también una tabla de dosificación y suger…
❤4👍1
Altas dosis de ivermectina y cáncer El Dr. William Makis presenta los mecanismos de acción de la ivermectina (IVM) para ayudar a eliminar diferentes tipos de cánceres, las vías de señalización que activa, las diferentes formas en que elimina a las células cancerosas y a las células madre del cáncer, algunos testimonios y las dosis que tomaron los pacientes, pero sobre todo conoceremos una tabla como guía para la dos…
👏5❤1👍1
Tratamiento exitoso de cáncer En este video el Dr. William Makis habla de los increíbles resultados que han tenido los pacientes oncológicos en diferentes tipos de cánceres, incluso los más agresivos y delicados, y estos antiparasitarios usados como fármacos reposicionados, han mostrado beneficios en otras enfermedades. Este tratamiento no sustituye las terapias oncológicas conocidas, sino que es una oportunidad qu…
👏4🔥3❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
👍9🔥5❤1
#IV_Congreso_Internacional_MPV 211025 Estimados miembros de Akasha Comunidad: Compartimos con ustedes las ponencias realizadas en el IV Congreso Internacional Médico, Científico y Jurídico: «Tiempo para Reflexionar, Conocer, Actuar y Avanzar», organizado por Médicos por la Verdad y llevado a cabo en la ciudad de Pontevedra, España, del 17 al 19 de octubre de 2025. Dra. Blanca Parga ¿La ONU nos fortalece o nos debi…
❤5👍3👏2👎1
Un Estudio Inconveniente: La Reacción Del se enfrenta a la oposición legal del Hospital Henry Ford por el próximo documental "Un estudio inconveniente”, que destaca lo que consideramos un estudio importante que muestra los resultados de salud entre niños vacunados y no vacunados. Ahora puede ver el nuevo trailer, que incluye imágenes de cámara oculta del autor principal del estudio y nuevas noticias. Comparte este …
👍5❤3👏1🔥1
La mentira de los 661 estudios El abogado principal de ICAN, Aaron Siri, en una conversación impresionante con Del Bigtree después de su enérgico testimonio en el Senado. Siri evidencia la narrativa falsa de que existen “661 estudios controladas con placebo de las vacunas" que recomienda la CDC, desmantelándola punto por punto. Hablan del estudio enterrado por el Hospital Henry Ford a presentarse en el próximo docum…
❤6🔥2👍1
Desmintiendo el dogma de las vacunas Recientemente el Secretario de Salud de los EE. UU., Robert F. Kennedy Jr., transmitió un video donde habla de los verdaderos factores en la disminución de la mortalidad por enfermedades infecciosas y como las vacunas llegaron tarde a la escena de la salud pública, hecho que fue tomado por la industria médica y farmacéutica para atribuirse el mérito, aumentar ganancias, prestigio…
🔥4👍2
661 estudios controlados con placebo de vacunas El abogado Aaron Siri en su intervención en la audiencia ante el Senado de EE. UU., destroza la afirmación del Dr. Jake Scott, especialista en enfermedades infecciosas, cuando dice que las 72 vacunas autorizadas en el calendario de vacunación infantil de rutina del CDC, han sido completamente estudiadas y probadas con estudios controlados con placebo y es ridícula la a…
❤🔥6❤2👏2🔥2👍1
Estudio completo: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/26089210-henry-ford-vaccinated-unvaccinated-study/
👍2😁1
El equipo del productor Del Bigtree realizó un documental sobre este suceso histórico que segura y realmente cambiará la salud de los estadounidenses y también muy seguramente influirá en la decisión de los padres de todo el mundo. Lo importante es que un resumen del estudio ya está publicado dentro de un informe al senado, durante una reciente audiencia en USA se habló de los resultados, mientras esperamos el estud…
👍6
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @COVIDEOS_Esp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“COVIDEOS” (@COVIDEOS_Esp), 1,723 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/COVIDEOS_Esp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.