CSAT lIVE CLASS- Factors and Divisibility Joining link 🔗 - https://youtube.com/live/sJ2eqdhjR2U?feature=share

Channel
CSAT COMPLETE
@CSAT_ConvertIAS
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,529subscribers
-22 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002223403768 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CSAT_ConvertIAS |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CSAT_ConvertIAS |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:37 | 3,529 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:49 | 3,534 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 3,539 | -5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:24 | 3,544 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:27 | 3,543 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:44 | 3,546 | -6 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 3,552 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 3,551 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
CSAT LIVE CLASS -From Basic to Advanced 💫 Joining link: https://youtube.com/live/aZDYGcYdtMQ?feature=share
This will be discussed in next session! 🔥 Very Interesting Topic - Will help you get Easy 10-15 Marks in CSAT! Do Not Miss the Session - Multiple Questions come from this Concept and Many Students Fail in i! https://www.convertias.com/subscription-details/csat_complete
CSAT COMPLETE pinned «Is (a^3) + (b^3) = (c^3) possible, if a, b, and c are natural numbers?»
Is (a^3) + (b^3) = (c^3) possible, if a, b, and c are natural numbers?
- (a) Possible61%
- (b) Not possible39%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
CSAT COMPLETE pinned «Today we have also discussed about a condition (a^3) + (b^3) = c^3, How many solutions are possible? In this everyone has the freedom to take a, b, and c as real number or integers. In the next session we will be discussing about this particular expression.…»
Today we have also discussed about a condition (a^3) + (b^3) = c^3, How many solutions are possible? In this everyone has the freedom to take a, b, and c as real number or integers. In the next session we will be discussing about this particular expression. Hint: make cases accordingly.
Today’s lecture. As we have discussed about the basics of numbers today in the next session we will be discussing about the prime numbers which is very important topic for UPSC. Please practice these questions and revise the topics.
File, posted without a caption
CSAT COMPLETE pinned a photo
How UPSC is putting limitations by using basics of numbers. Today in our lecture we will be discussing those aspects where UPSC use basic concept in data sufficiency question - making it difficult to moderate level.
CSAT COMPLETE pinned «Hello everyone, tomorrow we are starting with our first introductory lecture of CSAT complete 1. Our focus is to analyse the trend of UPSC CSAT. 2. Why UPSC is becoming more tougher? 3. Why to start early? 4. Some basics concepts related to Numbers and UPSC…»
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CSAT_ConvertIAS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Is (a^3) + (b^3) = (c^3) possible, if a, b, and c are natural numbers?
- (a) Possible61%
- (b) Not possible39%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which of the following is correct?
- (a)5%
- (b)26%
- (c)61%
- (d)8%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 24 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Prelims_Convertias · 49,195
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 25 August 2026
@Target_Sarkari_Exams · 135,066
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 13 August 2026
@UnlimitedEducation · 35,400
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 2 September 2026
@IASNiRMAN · 35,593
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 2 September 2026
@CsatSunyaIAS · 51,426
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 25 August 2026
@Indian_LAW_POLITY_JUDICIARY_PDF · 61,192
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 22 August 2026
@Unacademyofficialss · 159,951
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 12 August 2026
@Gk_Gs_Current_Affairs_quiz_Hindi · 48,532
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CSAT COMPLETE” (@CSAT_ConvertIAS), 3,529 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CSAT_ConvertIAS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.