Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Телеканал Страз

Channel

Телеканал Страз

@CTPA3bI

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,516subscribers

+157 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001353743301
TypeChannel
Username@CTPA3bI
Created4 April 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 November 2026
Measurements held58
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/CTPA3bI

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

16,30716,55516,4315 August 2026 — 16,359 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,359 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,357 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,346 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,343 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,335 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,333 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,330 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,322 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,333 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,330 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,343 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,345 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,344 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,314 subscribers21 August 2026 — 16,322 subscribers22 August 2026 — 16,335 subscribers24 August 2026 — 16,338 subscribers25 August 2026 — 16,335 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,341 subscribers27 August 2026 — 16,339 subscribers28 August 2026 — 16,334 subscribers29 August 2026 — 16,331 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,329 subscribers31 August 2026 — 16,330 subscribers1 September 2026 — 16,324 subscribers3 September 2026 — 16,326 subscribers5 September 2026 — 16,333 subscribers9 September 2026 — 16,342 subscribers11 September 2026 — 16,321 subscribers13 September 2026 — 16,316 subscribers15 September 2026 — 16,314 subscribers19 September 2026 — 16,307 subscribers26 September 2026 — 16,334 subscribers4 October 2026 — 16,321 subscribers9 October 2026 — 16,327 subscribers13 October 2026 — 16,339 subscribers14 October 2026 — 16,326 subscribers15 October 2026 — 16,319 subscribers16 October 2026 — 16,331 subscribers17 October 2026 — 16,367 subscribers18 October 2026 — 16,401 subscribers19 October 2026 — 16,482 subscribers20 October 2026 — 16,497 subscribers21 October 2026 — 16,532 subscribers22 October 2026 — 16,546 subscribers23 October 2026 — 16,544 subscribers24 October 2026 — 16,550 subscribers25 October 2026 — 16,555 subscribers26 October 2026 — 16,552 subscribers27 October 2026 — 16,549 subscribers28 October 2026 — 16,547 subscribers29 October 2026 — 16,548 subscribers30 October 2026 — 16,539 subscribers31 October 2026 — 16,526 subscribers1 November 2026 — 16,523 subscribers2 November 2026 — 16,513 subscribers3 November 2026 — 16,516 subscribers16,5165 August 20263 November 2026
58 measurements spanning 89 days, net +157. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,270–16,592 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Nov 2026, 07:5716,516+3
2 Nov 2026, 08:1616,513-10
1 Nov 2026, 05:2016,523-3
31 Oct 2026, 08:2816,526-13
30 Oct 2026, 10:4516,539-9
29 Oct 2026, 11:3116,548+1
28 Oct 2026, 11:1616,547-2
27 Oct 2026, 13:5716,549-3
26 Oct 2026, 15:1616,552-3
25 Oct 2026, 14:2716,555+5
24 Oct 2026, 16:2716,550+6
23 Oct 2026, 19:5616,544-2
22 Oct 2026, 20:3616,546+14
21 Oct 2026, 19:5116,532+35
20 Oct 2026, 13:0916,497+15
19 Oct 2026, 15:3916,482+81
18 Oct 2026, 15:1016,401+34
17 Oct 2026, 13:2816,367+36
16 Oct 2026, 16:1016,331+12
15 Oct 2026, 13:0916,319first reading

Engagement

78 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.9%
avg views ÷ 16,516 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,620
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 78 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held78 (2 August 2026 – 2 November 2026)
Views total20,959
Reactions total707
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Nov 2026, 03:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
18m 09s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 30 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

7,580 reactions across 70 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣2,97639.3%
🔥1,10514.6%
🤡79910.5%
😢5206.86%
custom 54089776553305172003714.89%
custom 54273738506628090943254.29%
🤯3064.04%
custom 54069043328828171882763.64%
🕊2583.40%
custom 53642014358587448691622.14%
custom 53730660765589965681431.89%
👍1321.74%
😍1321.74%
custom 5465283645788937267320.422%
🤝240.317%
⚡190.251%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 78 of the 78 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,330 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 78 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 78 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @CTPA3bI. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 78 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 2 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
2.56%
2 of 78 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
2,660
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
3,930
over 76 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnjcYVXoz130 October 202630 October 2026
2SDnjdY9zQb110 August 202610 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 78 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 2 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

2 Nov 2026, 23:18 UTC659 views46 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Video

Господи, легенда

🤣31🔥8custom 54089776553305172005🤡1custom 54273738506628090941

31 Oct 2026, 19:35 UTC≈2,910 views151 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Video

Просто рейв в Ленинской библиотеке. Вероятно, такого она ещё не видала… 🎥 Dementieva

🔥79🤯51🤡7🕊5custom 54273738506628090944👍2custom 53642014358587448692🤝1

31 Oct 2026, 11:57 UTC≈2,840 views97 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Video

Соседка Волочковой это чисто все миллениалы игнорят своё сорокалетие

🤣66😢15custom 54069043328828171887🤯5custom 54273738506628090942🤝1custom 54089776553305172001

30 Oct 2026, 15:29 UTC≈2,850 views51 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Теперь мы видели всё: грядёт коллаборация Bottega Veneta с муми-троллями! Креативный директор модного дома уже выложила в сторис анимационный ролик, а японский глянец показал сниппет коллекции. Знаменитые сумки Andiamo и Campana в расцветке полосатого фартука Муми-мамы. Есть шармы (кожаные брелоки) с муми-троллями, кошельки, обложки для паспортов и аксессуары с иллюстрациями Туве Янссон. Некоторые персонажи выполнен…

🔥31custom 536420143585874486910custom 54069043328828171886🤡3🤣1

30 Oct 2026, 14:17 UTC≈2,660 views8 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Advertisementerid 2SDnjcYVXozPhoto

«Ну и куда пойдем?» — кажется, эта фраза пережила миллионы переписок. 💔 Чтобы переход из онлайна в реальную жизнь был красивым и легким, Мамба объединились с Restoclub. Вместе они собрали подборки заведений с идеальным меню, вкусной едой и правильной атмосферой. Никаких неловких пауз и шума. Внутри — только проверенные локации, но главное: в каждом заведении из подборки для вас приготовили подарок за бронирование. Со…

🔥4😍2custom 53642014358587448692

30 Oct 2026, 13:12 UTC≈3,140 views144 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Video

Ребят ну это контэмп это наш Том Йорк

🔥83🤣34custom 540897765533051720012😍5custom 53730660765589965684custom 54273738506628090943custom 53642014358587448692🤡1

30 Oct 2026, 11:21 UTC≈2,660 views109 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Forwarded from @goldchihuahuaVideo

танкист и девочка в кокошнике как самые пугающие хеллоуиновские костюмы

🤣68🤯35custom 53730660765589965684custom 53642014358587448692

29 Oct 2026, 22:10 UTC≈3,240 views101 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Юрген Теллер сфоткал Демну в его миланском циане. Пишут, что "интерьер — микс советской бытовой эстетики и итальянского дизайна" Над обеденным столом висит «советская пропагандистская картина 1983 года" что бы это ни значило. Так себе жильё Демны представляли?

🤣53🔥24🤯12🤡6custom 54089776553305172004custom 54069043328828171882

2 Sept 2026, 10:21 UTC≈2,030 views66 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Присоединяемся к недоумению соцсетей, когда Юрий Дудь (иноагент) так умудрился раскачаться?

🔥43🤯14custom 53730660765589965683🤣2🕊1custom 53642014358587448691custom 54089776553305172001custom 54273738506628090941

31 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC≈2,830 views68 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Мет Галу в честь Джона Гальяно всё-таки отменили. Vogue и Метрополитен-музей объявили, что выставка John Galliano: Horizons, которая должна пройти параллельно с Met Gala, не состоится. Это должна была быть первая большая музейная ретроспектива Гальяно за всю его карьеру. После анонса все вспомнили скандал 2011 года, когда Гальяно уволили из Dior после антисемитских и расистских высказываний. Масла в огонь подлило и…

😢20🤣15👍12🕊8🤡7custom 54069043328828171884🔥2

31 Aug 2026, 11:56 UTC≈2,820 views51 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026
Video

Лолита дала замах на Селин Дион на Новой Волне с кавером на Пугачеву. Предварив выступление дисклеймером, что Раймонд Паулс, вероятно, не подозревает о её существовании. Соцсети плачут всей маршруткой, как и люди в зале (включая Леру Кудрявцеву). Лолиту любим, но переслушали оригинал и всё-таки, если непредвзято, Алла сделала это изящнее, хотя живьем может тоже иначе.

🔥31custom 540897765533051720011😢6🤡2custom 54273738506628090941

31 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC≈2,900 views68 reactionsread 3 September 2026

За всю жизнь или за ночь в «Рабице»? 😇

🤣57🤡4😍4custom 53730660765589965683

Showing the 12 most recent of 78 posts we hold for @CTPA3bI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

russiansinlondon
@russiansinlnd · 21,388
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 September 2026
Алло, Галочка, ты не поверишь!
@hello_galochka · 35,118
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 3 September 2026
Русский шаффл
@rushuffle · 44,111
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 August 2026
Каждой твари - кампари
@tvrkmpr · 22,680
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 September 2026
ХАЙЛАЙТЕР
@goshakartsevcalling · 40,258
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 30 August 2026
Говорящая Тыква
@talking_pumpkin · 32,272
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 5 September 2026
psycho daily
@psychodaily · 18,935
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 5 October 2026
Героиня Татлера
@tatlersheroine · 102,567
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 August 2026
🐍МОСКВИЧКА🐍
@glavmoskvichka · 32,682
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
ГОРИ ЯСНО
@gori_yasno · 21,987
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 September 2026
Зинаида Пронченко
@ZinaidaPronchenko · 74,212
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 August 2026
Миллиарды
@overbillions · 31,687
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 6 September 2026
Vika Chuma
@chumavecherinka · 19,421
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 October 2026
Golden Chihuahua
@goldchihuahua · 91,282
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 17 August 2026
Скромное Обаяние Пацана
@kukan_sportif · 37,927
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 31 August 2026
НЕПРОЗАМУЖ
@mortalbeauty · 46,537
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 August 2026
Парнасский пересмешник
@captainpaleo · 51,757
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 24 August 2026
Я не понимаю это смешно или уже нет!!
@sashaonline · 86,149
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 August 2026
Рената Литвинова
@renatalitvinova · 86,394
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 August 2026
DECODERS
@d3c0d3rzzz · 20,899
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 September 2026
Эпоха 90-х
@LostGen · 27,754
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 September 2026
GENAU
@genau · 20,069
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 2 October 2026
Мужчина, вы куда?
@crisisman · 47,583
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 28 August 2026
Леонардо Ди Ванче
@skvir · 20,983
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 24 September 2026

This channel appears in 32 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Телеканал Страз” (@CTPA3bI), 16,516 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CTPA3bI.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.