Інвестиційна команда @OstanniyCapitalist.
capitalistinvest.com
Питання й пропозиції – @CapInvest_Admin
[email protected]
Минулі результати не є гарантією майбутніх. Ми не надаємо жодних рекомендацій чи порад щодо інвестицій.
Created
31 July 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 92 days, net +364. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,950–17,722 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 01:09
17,403
-12
6 Nov 2026, 02:56
17,415
-21
5 Nov 2026, 00:47
17,436
-17
4 Nov 2026, 03:36
17,453
-20
2 Nov 2026, 23:56
17,473
-12
2 Nov 2026, 01:47
17,485
-17
1 Nov 2026, 02:39
17,502
-16
31 Oct 2026, 02:17
17,518
-8
30 Oct 2026, 05:30
17,526
-18
29 Oct 2026, 02:30
17,544
-7
28 Oct 2026, 02:29
17,551
-7
27 Oct 2026, 02:54
17,558
-6
26 Oct 2026, 02:11
17,564
-17
24 Oct 2026, 23:55
17,581
-13
24 Oct 2026, 00:30
17,594
-8
22 Oct 2026, 21:57
17,602
-4
21 Oct 2026, 19:46
17,606
-12
20 Oct 2026, 18:20
17,618
-10
19 Oct 2026, 15:15
17,628
-5
18 Oct 2026, 12:54
17,633
first reading
Engagement
48 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
102.1%
avg views ÷ 17,403 subscribers
Avg views / post
17,800
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.097%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 48 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held
48 (9 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total
195,470
Reactions total
189
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 16:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
527
Videos
4
Links
420
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
1,055 reactions across 48 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
674
63.9%
❤
303
28.7%
🔥
26
2.46%
😁
24
2.27%
👎
19
1.80%
🤯
8
0.758%
😱
1
0.095%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,055 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
2.08%
1 of 48 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
3,720
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
7,010
over 47 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 11 posts held from the last 30 days (9.09%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Кен Гріффін і бульбашка ШІ
Вирішили проаналізувати розмову з засновником Citadel Securities, що обробляє близько третини всіх рітейл угод з акціями та опціонами у США. Це дуже важлива розмова, і, звісно, що вона залишилась досить непомітною в інвест світі, як і більшість важливих тем, які на ринку помічають дуже пізно з новин.
Так, це той самий Гріффін, який викупив усі позиції Лео Ашенбреннера😁 в липні після маржи…
Зміни під капотом
9 секторів з 11 зросли – індекс усе одно впав. США видобувають нафти більше за всіх – бензин усе одно дорожчий за $4 за галон. Тиждень про різницю між «захист є» і «захист працює»🫠.
У п'ятницю зник весь тижневий відскок чипів: SOX упав на 7,20%, комунікаційні послуги вдруге стали найслабшим сектором. Рівнозважений індекс попереду четвертий тиждень поспіль, а облігації ще пом'якшували падіння.
Вла…
Довгостроковий аналіз енергетичного сектору
США залишилися найбільшим виробником нафти у світі, а бензин там усе одно вперше з 2022 року перевищив $4 за галон. Фактичне закриття Ормузької протоки, через яку йде близько 20% світової нафти, стало найбільшим шоком пропозиції в історії😱.
Газ натомість розколовся на регіони: азійський JKM і європейський TTF перевищували $30 за MMBtu, а американський Henry Hub тримається…
Від акцій до стартапів: як працюють приватні інвестиції і кому вони підходять
Як інвестують у компанії ще до їхнього виходу на біржу? Чому одні втрачають гроші, а інші заробляють — і чи є тут місце новачкам?
2 листопада о 18:00 за Києвом колеги розберуть це на відкритому вебінарі ICLUB.
🔥 Серед учасників Вікторія Тігіпко — засновниця ICLUB та TA Ventures, яка за 17 років проінвестувала у стартапи $75 млн.
Мова пі…
Азійський оборонний трильйон
Коли говорять про оборонний цикл, майже завжди мають на увазі Європу: війна поруч, цілі НАТО, перезапуск заводів. Тим часом азійський цикл іде окремо, він навіть більший у грошах і майже не потрапляє в портфелі рітейл-інвесторів😳.
У 2026 році Азія витрачає на оборону близько $702 млрд проти $431 млрд у ЄС. Це плюс 10% за рік у доларах і 1,8% регіонального ВВП – найвищий рівень щонайменш…
Куди піде фінансування?
Тиждень, коли $META показала +26% реклами і 3,64 млрд користувачів, а її сектор упав на 4,36% – найгірше на ринку. Питання вже навіть не в результатах, а майбутньому, точніше хто його буде оплачувати🫥 для всіх гігантів та повʼязаних з ШІ темам.
Цікаво🧐, що динаміка руху індексу сильно перегукується з тим, як ми його імплікували з позиціонування дилерів для кожного дня минулого тижня. Ретросп…
Як їде аграрка?
З початку липня пшениця подорожчала приблизно на 12%, кукурудза – на 15%. І сталося це не через урожай, а через те, що удари по чорноморських експортних терміналах і торгових суднах стали частішими🎧. Ціну зараз визначає не те, скільки зерна виросло, а те, чи може воно доїхати до покупця.
Масштаб такий: росія та Україна разом дають близько 30% світового експорту пшениці й близько 16% кукурудзи. Розпо…
Як управляти портфелем в період капексного буму
До 2030 року на AI-інфраструктуру має піти близько $5,5 трлн. Власний грошовий потік гіперскейлерів покриває лише $1 трлн, тобто менш ніж 20%. Понад половину суми становить борг, а найбільша окрема стаття – облігації інвестиційного рівня на $2,1 трлн.
Це змінює саму природу буму🤯. Поки капекс фінансується з прибутку, це внутрішня справа компанії. Щойно гроші залучають…
Гарантії, яких немає в балансі
Тиждень, коли ставки знижувалися, а чипи втратили 11,41%: ціну ризику тепер призначає не ставка, а спред🧐.
SOX падав усі п'ять сесій поспіль, Корея – мінус 14,46%. Але рівнозважений індекс обігнав звичайний на 2,46 в.п., а Європа додала 2,09%. Це не вихід з акцій: десятирічна дохідність упала з 5,24% до 5,10%, тоді як спред високодохідного ШІ-боргу вийшов на 377 б.п. – на 168 б.п. вищ…
Коли закінчиться кредитне свято?
Якщо прибрати з AI-історії токени, гігавати й слайди про окупність, лишається простий ланцюжок: немає боргу – немає капексу, немає капексу – немає зростання, немає зростання – немає рекордних прибутків в індексі. Боргом зараз фінансується від третини до половини майбутнього AI-капексу🤩.
Масштаб змінився швидше, ніж встигли перебудуватися моделі. Випуск боргу гіперскейлерами: менше $…
Свято закінчується по черзі
Індекс додав 1,15%, індекс чипів віддав 4,30%, Корея – 5,39%. Жодна макроціна проти ризику не змінилася: змінився власник. Гроші не виходили з ринку, а перекладалися в нудне – комунальні +3,97% при технологіях у мінусі. Вперше за сім тижнів середня акція обігнала гігантів, і сплачено це просадкою лідера😁.
Найгірше ціну ризику видно в боргах. Ними фінансується від третини до половини AI-к…
Атом повертається, але повільніше, ніж будуються дата-центри
Європа двадцять років закривала реактори🤷♂️. З 133 ГВт на початку 2000-х залишилося 98 ГВт, і це досі 24% усієї електроенергії ЄС. А тепер попит розвернувся, і розвернув його не енергетика, а технології.
Базовий сценарій Брюсселя до 2050 року: 109 ГВт. Тобто плюс 11 ГВт нетто за двадцять п'ять років, бо під ці 11 ГВт потрібно побудувати близько 60 ГВт но…
👍33❤6😁3🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @CapitalistInvest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@CapitalistInvest edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
20 August 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @CapitalistInvest as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
26 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
26 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
44 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Останній Капіталіст ✙ @OstanniyCapitalist · 118,340 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026
iPlan.ua @iplanua · 21,624 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 23 September 2026
Ціна держави @costukraine · 37,398 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 1 September 2026
Inzhur @InzhurREIT · 58,988 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Capitalist Invest” (@CapitalistInvest), 17,403 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CapitalistInvest.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.