Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Capitalist.net

Channel

Capitalist.net

@Capitalist_net

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,119subscribers

-96 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001101355970
TypeChannel
Username@Capitalist_net
DescriptionCapitalist.net — №1 payment system for affiliates in challenging geos, since 2014 35+ payment methods in 100+ countries: • Mass Payouts • 0% within the system • Free multi-currency wallet • Trusted virtual cards USD/EUR Support: @Capitalist_Support_Bot
CreatedBetween 1 February 2017 and 28 February 2018 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Capitalist_net

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,1136,2156,1646 August 2026 — 6,215 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,215 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,212 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,208 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,203 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,199 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,195 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,184 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,177 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,169 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,157 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,154 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,146 subscribers18 September 2026 — 6,142 subscribers27 September 2026 — 6,130 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,140 subscribers11 October 2026 — 6,143 subscribers14 October 2026 — 6,141 subscribers17 October 2026 — 6,134 subscribers20 October 2026 — 6,123 subscribers23 October 2026 — 6,128 subscribers26 October 2026 — 6,117 subscribers29 October 2026 — 6,113 subscribers4 November 2026 — 6,119 subscribers6,1196 August 20264 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 91 days, net -96. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,098–6,230 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 22:296,119+6
29 Oct 2026, 11:416,113-4
26 Oct 2026, 05:066,117-11
23 Oct 2026, 05:496,128+5
20 Oct 2026, 12:016,123-11
17 Oct 2026, 11:376,134-7
14 Oct 2026, 22:076,141-2
11 Oct 2026, 19:216,143+3
5 Oct 2026, 13:176,140+10
27 Sept 2026, 12:366,130-12
18 Sept 2026, 04:366,142-4
14 Sept 2026, 02:406,146-8
9 Sept 2026, 23:156,154-3
4 Sept 2026, 17:216,157-12
29 Aug 2026, 01:176,169-8
25 Aug 2026, 22:236,177-7
22 Aug 2026, 13:336,184-11
19 Aug 2026, 02:476,195-4
16 Aug 2026, 08:456,199-4
12 Aug 2026, 18:146,203first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.55%
avg views ÷ 6,119 subscribers
Avg views / post
462
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held18 (30 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total3,232
Reactions total97
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 16:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
980
Videos
10
Links
671

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

173 reactions across 14 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4123.7%
custom 52918778630861067123017.3%
🔥2514.5%
👍2212.7%
🆒158.67%
👌158.67%
😎95.20%
👏63.47%
🙏52.89%
🌚21.16%
☃10.578%
🎄10.578%
🤝10.578%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 207 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 7 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 10:45 UTC253 views9 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Introducing permanent USDT addresses in Capitalist! You can now create separate addresses for receiving USDT on TRON (TRC20) and track the balance of each one. What's inside: 😀 multiple addresses with custom names 😀 a separate balance for each address 😀 copy an address or show it as a QR code 😀 funds stay on the address until you decide where to send them, including payouts through any channel Where to find it: “A…

🔥4👍2❤1👌1🤝1

3 Nov 2026, 08:59 UTC352 views16 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Binance suffered the biggest crypto heist on record, Stellar is taking stablecoin payments to 190 countries, and TikTok is opening its ad network to more US advertisers. 1. Binance hit by $6.3 billion hack, the largest in crypto history Binance estimates that about $6.3 billion was stolen after a compromised employee laptop gave an attacker access to its systems, and analysts point to North Korea-linked hackers. Th…

custom 52918778630861067125👏4❤2☃1🎄1👌1👍1🆒1

30 Oct 2026, 09:00 UTC516 views12 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

From 5-tonne stones to 4-digit PINs: payments have come a long way. Which story surprised you most? Capitalist

custom 52918778630861067124🔥3🙏2❤1👍1🆒1

29 Oct 2026, 09:01 UTC529 views14 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Your payout batch didn't fail. It partly failed – that's worse. At scale, payouts usually break in three places: • Batch blindness: one status for thousands of payments • Partial failures: you find out when the recipient complains • Reconciliation lag: manual matching, every cycle A 2% exception rate means 20 investigations per every 1,000 payments. At Capitalist, we've been working with mass payouts since 2014. …

custom 52918778630861067127🆒4❤3

27 Oct 2026, 09:40 UTC467 views16 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Money20/20 week put stablecoins on the checkout counter, a bank put one on 3.3 million phones, and ChatGPT ads went global. 1. Mastercard launches Stablecoin Security Unveiled at Money20/20 USA, the new tool checks a stablecoin transaction for fraud and scam signals before the funds move. Borderless.xyz and Keyrails are the first partners. 2. Mesh and Visa: pay from your crypto balance Users can now pay with cryp…

custom 52918778630861067126👍3🔥3👏2😎1🆒1

26 Oct 2026, 09:04 UTC492 views11 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

100+ countries. Multiple payment methods. One account. That's the size of Capitalist’s portfolio today. Whether your partner is paid by card in one country, by bank transfer in another, or in crypto somewhere else, you can send it from the same place. International and local methods, SWIFT, SEPA and crypto, all in one account. Fewer tools to juggle. Faster payouts. More time to grow your business. That’s what Capi…

❤4🆒4custom 52918778630861067123

23 Oct 2026, 09:02 UTC623 views19 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Eight currencies, eight words for "cents" From the sen that disappeared in 1953 to the Swiss coin with four names, small change has big stories. Which one did you not know? Capitalist

custom 52918778630861067125👌4🔥4🆒3❤2😎1

11 Aug 2026, 09:47 UTC272 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Everything you need to know about payments, condensed into 8 slides. Use this knowledge responsibly 💎 Enough wisdom for today. Explore payment solutions with Capitalist 🗣️

😎5❤3👍3👌2🔥2

10 Aug 2026, 10:24 UTC353 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

The Capitalist team is flying to Jakarta — we'll be at Indonesia Blockchain Week 2026 on August 12–13 at the Jakarta International Convention Center (JICC), Southeast Asia's largest Web3 summit. 📣 If you're around, come say hi! We're happy to talk about payments, card infrastructure, White Label and API solutions, fintech and Web3 trends — or anything else on your mind. Let's swap contacts and find ways to work toge…

❤6👍4🔥3

7 Aug 2026, 10:14 UTC523 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

A three-legged frog, 12 grapes at midnight or a pig trying to enter your home — depending on where you are, any of these could mean that money is on its way 💵 We’ve collected some of the most curious wealth symbols and traditions from around the world. Take a look and tell us: do you have a money ritual of your own? For the more practical side of money, explore Capitalist.net

❤5👍2🔥2

6 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC404 viewsread 10 August 2026

We’re starting ❗️❗️❗️ Leave your questions for Jon in the comments under the AMA post above. He’ll be answering them during the session. ➡️

6 Aug 2026, 09:54 UTC404 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

What would you ask Capitalist’s Regional Growth Director? 🔥 Today at 3:00 pm (GMT+3), Jon Acoca will join us for an AMA session. Payments, business growth, partnerships, fintech, or the challenges your team is facing — prepare your questions and join the conversation. We’ll open the discussion under this post when the session begins. See you soon! 🚀

❤6🔥4👍2😎2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Capitalist_net. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Capitalist.net” (@Capitalist_net), 6,119 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Capitalist_net.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.