❗️Free Medical Books More than 10000 Books Get All Kind of Medical Books Here FREE ⚡️https://t.me/medical_free_books https://t.me/medical_ebook_pdfs 🎓 Best Medical Courses at upto 57.5 percent discount 👉 https://medustudy.com/

Channel
Cardiology Videos
@Cardiography_Videos
On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
16,273subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001443898543 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Cardiography_Videos |
| Created | 10 May 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Cardiography_Videos |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 22:39 | 16,273 | -7 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 12:20 | 16,280 | +14 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 22:59 | 16,266 | -4 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 21:59 | 16,270 | -1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 00:22 | 16,271 | +5 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 00:55 | 16,266 | +4 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:57 | 16,262 | -3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:25 | 16,265 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:35 | 16,267 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 16,270 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:36 | 16,276 | +4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 16,272 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:08 | 16,271 | +2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 16,269 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 20:06 | 16,271 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 03:29 | 16,270 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:24 | 16,272 | -2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 19:08 | 16,274 | -3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:26 | 16,277 | -5 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 13:14 | 16,282 | first reading |
Engagement
43 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.27%
- avg views ÷ 16,273 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 533
- 11 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 11
- of 43 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 43 (25 July 2026 – 30 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,861 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 3h 39m
- Average length
- 12m 55s
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
HFSA Videos 2026 The Art and Science of Lung Transplantation Remote Monitoring Free Cardio Videos : https://t.me/Cardiography_Videos/681
2026 ASNC Nuclear Cardiology Board Exam Prep Course ______________________________________ 👇 Tap the buttons below https://youtu.be/uIHoqbA5krQ https://medustudy.com/product/2026-asnc-nuclear-cardiology-board-exam-prep-course/ https://youtu.be/uIHoqbA5krQ
2026 ASNC Nuclear Cardiology Board Exam Prep Course ______________________________________ 👇 Tap the buttons below https://medustudy.com/product/2026-asnc-nuclear-cardiology-board-exam-prep-course/
2026 ASNC Nuclear Cardiology Board Exam Prep Course ______________________________________ 👇 Tap the buttons below https://youtu.be/uIHoqbA5krQ https://medustudy.com/product/2026-asnc-nuclear-cardiology-board-exam-prep-course/ https://youtu.be/uIHoqbA5krQ
📢 STATdx Accounts Available – Limited Stock Limited STATdx access accounts are now available on a first-come, first-served basis. 3 Months Access — ₹1,800 / $25 USD 6 Months Access — ₹2,700 / $35 USD ⚡️ Limited accounts available ✅ Choose 3-month or 6-month access ⏳ First come, first served Interested users can message to purchase. Contacct @MEDICUSMLE See samples HEre : https://t.me/Medustudy_samples/1252
❗️Free Medical Books More than 10000 Books Get All Kind of Medical Books Here FREE ⚡️https://t.me/medical_free_books https://t.me/medical_ebook_pdfs 🎓 Best Medical Courses at upto 27.5 percent discount 👉 https://medustudy.com/
Houston Methodist 14th Annual Re-Evolution Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery (MICS) Summit 2026 ______________________________________ 👇 Tap the buttons below https://medustudy.com/product/houston-methodist-14th-annual-re-evolution-minimally-invasive-cardiac-surgery-mics-summit-2026/
005_democratizing-minimally-invasive-surgery-where-do-we-stand-in-2026 Houston Methodist 14th Annual Re-Evolution Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery (MICS) Summit 2026 ______________________________________ 👇 Tap the buttons below https://medustudy.com/product/houston-methodist-14th-annual-re-evolution-minimally-invasive-cardiac-surgery-mics-summit-2026/ Free videos : https://t.me/uworld_pdfs/988
003_coronary-stents-from-restenosis-to-precision-pci-key-advances-in-interventional-cardiology Houston Methodist 10th Annual Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist (CNC) 2026 ______________________________________ 👇 Tap the buttons below https://medustudy.com/product/houston-methodist-10th-annual-cardiology-for-the-non-cardiologist-cnc-2026/ https://t.me/Buy_Cardiology_videos/1757
Houston Methodist 10th Annual Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist (CNC) 2026 ______________________________________ 👇 Tap the buttons below https://medustudy.com/product/houston-methodist-10th-annual-cardiology-for-the-non-cardiologist-cnc-2026/
Assessment of Functional Capacity Including CPET in HF - G.Lewis HFSA AHFTC Board Certification Review 2026 OnDemand – Videos + PDFs + QBank ______________________________________ 👇 Tap the buttons below https://medustudy.com/product/hfsa-ahftc-board-certification-review-2026-ondemand/ Free videos : https://t.me/Buy_Cardiology_videos/1753
Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @Cardiography_Videos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@medustudy_shop · 17,47320 postsCardiology Courses
@Buy_Cardiology_videos · 7,13715 postsBuy Radiology Courses
@Buy_Radiology_Videos · 5,5912 postsMedical Books Pdf
@medical_free_books · 6,5052 postsNeurology Courses
@neurology_course · 5,6722 postsBoardVitals Qbank
@boardvitals_q · 2631 postInternal medicine Books
@internal_medicine_pdfs · 9,6011 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Buy_Cardiology_videos · 7,13714 postsMedustudy Samples
@Medustudy_samples · 7,9114 postsMedustudy shop
@medustudy_shop · 17,4733 postsBuy Radiology Courses
@Buy_Radiology_Videos · 5,5912 postsMedical Books pdf
@medical_ebook_pdfs · 19,7682 postsMedical Books Pdf
@medical_free_books · 6,5052 postsNeurology Courses
@neurology_course · 5,6722 postsBoardVitals Qbank
@boardvitals_q · 2631 postFamily medicine courses
@family_medicine_courses · 3,4271 postInternal medicine Books
@internal_medicine_pdfs · 9,6011 postUworld Qbanks 2026
@uworld_pdfs · 40,1411 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@paedsvideos · 50,152
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 26 August 2026
@HakimApps_Guideline · 32,777
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 September 2026
@Updates_in_Medicine · 47,787
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 26 August 2026
@medical_mnemonics · 63,572
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 26 August 2026
@mbbsmaterials · 67,418
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 26 August 2026
@MedicalBooksStoreA · 42,086
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 29 August 2026
@medicinevideoss · 102,991
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 26 August 2026
@easymedicine7 · 29,375
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 September 2026
@PDFology · 66,712
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 August 2026
@The_NEJM · 27,342
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 September 2026
@physiology_yaqob · 33,582
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cardiology Videos” (@Cardiography_Videos), 16,273 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Cardiography_Videos.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.