Мои детки утром) Если что, не переживайте, сегодня может что-то выложу из скетчей, ибо я делаю параллельно 3 работы, гайс #мопсята ⛧ @Cat_Bastett
custom 534354041837193008513❤2

Channel
@Cat_Bastett
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
159subscribers
+12 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001821755709 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Cat_Bastett |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Cat_Bastett |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 02:57 | 159 | +4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:56 | 155 | +2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 153 | +3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 02:42 | 150 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:24 | 147 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 147 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
185 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5343540418371930085 | 61 | 33.0% | |
| ❤ | 46 | 24.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 43 | 23.2% | |
| 😨 | 14 | 7.57% | |
| 👻 | 9 | 4.86% | |
| custom 5341292819036255161 | 5 | 2.70% | |
| 🆒 | 3 | 1.62% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 1.62% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.541% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 185 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Мои детки утром) Если что, не переживайте, сегодня может что-то выложу из скетчей, ибо я делаю параллельно 3 работы, гайс #мопсята ⛧ @Cat_Bastett
custom 534354041837193008513❤2
Я уже поняла, вы хотите мопсов) #мопсята ⛧ @Cat_Bastett
custom 534354041837193008517❤2🥰1
Мини скетч такого гарнюнчика для @LkitH0 Я так захотела #КПД ⛧ @Cat_Bastett
custom 534354041837193008513❤🔥5🔥1🆒1
Что тут у нас Дизайн не утвержден и может измениться #КПД #кпд_гибриды #wip #заказы ⛧ @Cat_Bastett
👻9custom 53435404183719300854❤🔥1
Чисто по приколу вопрос. Что вам больше нравится?
The shares total 209%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Итак, Болотистый Ревун, гибрид Нюхохвата🌟 и Громобоя🌟 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ • Класс: Водные 💧 • Залп: Звуковые волны • Обитают драконы в болотистых местностях. Поровну находятся что на суше, что в воде, на мелководьях • Дракон не может дышать под водой, но может задерживать дыхание на, примерно, часа 2. • Охотятся как на суше, так и в воде. В волоёмах они отходят к водорослям, ложатся на дно и поднимают свои головы. Привлек…
❤🔥13❤7custom 53435404183719300853🔥1🆒1
Это еще кто такой🤩 Подсказка: 💧🌿 #КПД #кпд_гибриды #wip ⛧ @Cat_Bastett
❤🔥17❤1
Канон Не стесняйтесь давать свои идеи #КПД #colorswap ⛧ @Cat_Bastett
❤13❤🔥5custom 53435404183719300852🆒1
КПД фандом - тюрьма. Клянусь, я уже заебалась смотреть на эту бредятину в тик токе. Вместо контента и реально интересной инфы - нейрослопский пиздёж. Ладно Тайфумеранг какого-то хрена быстрее Скрилла, но какого хера они летают по 700м/сек (~2500км/ч) блять. Всего-то обогнали баллистическую ракету и скорость звука в 7 раз, с кем не бывает! Про последующие скрины я даже хз что сказать. Мало того, что информация полная…
😨14custom 53412928190362551615❤2❤🔥2🔥1
Ещё думаю редизнуть старых товарищей. Как минимум потому что некоторых я могла б сделать и лучше, а файлы некоторых я потеряла навсегда, оставшись, соответственно, без их лайнов Что думаете?
custom 53435404183719300859❤5
У меня вот идея. Может мне стоит выкладывать фрилайны моих гибридов вам? Хотели б такое? Не могу только обещать какие они именно будут. Может с нуля нарисую чибиков, а может выложу те, что на артах. По правилам же стандартно будет: отмечать авторство и не рисовать НСФВ на этих лайнах.
❤14
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @Cat_Bastett. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Чисто по приколу вопрос. Что вам больше нравится?
The shares total 209%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cat Bastet” (@Cat_Bastett), 159 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Cat_Bastett.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.