Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Charos Burxon ijodi

Channel

Charos Burxon ijodi

@ChBurxon

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

151subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002154980242
TypeChannel
Username@ChBurxon
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ChBurxon

Growth

1511551539 August 2026 — 155 subscribers9 August 2026 — 155 subscribers24 August 2026 — 154 subscribers1 September 2026 — 153 subscribers10 September 2026 — 151 subscribers9 August 202610 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 32 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 150–156 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 13:36151-2
1 Sept 2026, 12:58153-1
24 Aug 2026, 16:03154-1
9 Aug 2026, 13:00155no change
9 Aug 2026, 12:48155first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
47s
Average length
47s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

235 reactions across 16 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥6226.4%
3615.3%
😢2611.1%
❤‍🔥2410.2%
💯135.53%
🥰125.11%
👍114.68%
🤣114.68%
😁83.40%
😍83.40%
👏52.13%
😱52.13%
😭31.28%
🤩31.28%
🤯31.28%
🎉20.851%
10.426%
👌10.426%
🦄10.426%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 235 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 17:28 UTC78 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Онажонлар, яқинроқ келинг. Гап бор😉 3 ёшдан 8 ёшгача фарзандингиз бўлса ва унда ижодкорлик, фикрлаш, чизиш кўникмаларини шакллантиришни истасангиз бу марафон айнан сиз учун. Фарзандларимга раво кўрганимни уларнинг тенгдошларига ҳам улашишни истадим. Марафон линкини пастда қолдираман: https://t.me/+T2uNhVn84JpmNzA6 Айтганча, марафон теппа текин🫠 @ChBurxon

🤩3👍2

8 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC47 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Meni pulimga singlisiga zirak olibdi "Hiyladan saboq" telenovellasi. Xotini yillar davomida zirak olishni niyat qilib o‘zi ishlab yiqqan pullarni olib, singlisiga zirak oldi. Shu ham erkakda?! Aka-ukaning opa-singlisiga narxidan qatʼiy nazar sovg‘a berishini qadrlayman. Lekin bu ishni xotinining puli evaziga emas(yetmaganiga ayolini norozi qilib), o‘zi ishlab topgan pul evaziga qilishi kerak!

3🔥3👍2🥰2👌1

7 Aug 2026, 15:36 UTC57 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

"Eng yaxshi ota-ona bo‘lish — bu farzandingga hamma narsani berish emas. Bu unga o‘zi istagan narsaga erishishni o‘rgatish". @ChBurxon

🔥71👍1

7 Aug 2026, 14:26 UTC58 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

"Nega biz “qilolmayman” deyishni “qanday qilsam bo‘ladi?” deb so‘rashdan ko‘ra tezroq tanlaymiz? Sabab — miya energiya tejaydigan organ. “Yo‘q” bu qisqa, oson, energiya talab qilmaydigan javob. “Boshqa yo‘l qidirish” esa kognitiv mehnat talab qiladi". @ChBurxon

🔥5👏1

4 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC97 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ГУЛЁР (II) Ғижима рўмол бошимда-ё, гулёр, Сочоқлари қошимда-ё, гулёр, Ўн тўрт яшар ёшимда-ё, гулёр, Рўзғор тушди бошимга-ё, гулёр. Шойи кўйлак шохчада-ё, гулёр, Шалдирайди бўғчада-ё, гулёр. Ёмон ёри қурисин-о, гулёр, Ғўлдирайди кўчада-ё, гулёр. Ғижима рўмол ўрайман-о, гулёр, Сочоғига қарайман-о, гулёр. Ёрим ишдан келганда-ё, гулёр, Қовоғига қарайман-о, гулёр. "Омон ёр" халқ қўшиқларидан Зоминда ўқиган вақтларим,

😢7🔥5😱2🥰1

4 Aug 2026, 19:57 UTC76 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Аслида, ҳаётимизга кириб келганларнинг ҳам, чиқиб кетганларнинг ҳам бир хайри бор. Аммо сабаблар бизни қийнайверади... @ChBurxon

💯32🔥21👏1

4 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC79 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

"Дарду алам толиқтирар, биз фонийларни!"

😢6

28 Jul 2026, 11:41 UTC138 views21 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Bolalikda hech uydan qochganmisiz, deb so'rov qo'yibdi illyustratorlik ustozim. Shu ustozim yomonam ilhomlarimni uyg‘otishni biladida))) Bolaligimda ko'p o'ynab ketib qolardim. Vaqt o'tganini bilmasdim o'yin bilan. Shu sababli bir marta uydan "quvilganman" ham🤣🤣🤣 Bor o'zingga boshqa ona top, meni ona dema, deganlar onam jahl ustida.(shu darajada o'tkazvorgan bo'lsam kerakda) Keyin rosa o'ylaganman kimni ona qilishni🤣

🤣11😁8🥰2

28 Jul 2026, 05:37 UTC131 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Мана мен нима учун бир дунё ёзув-чизувим бўлса ҳам болаларимни ухлатиш учун ёнида ётаман. Бирга мультфильм кўраман, бирга расм чизаман....

🔥83👍2

28 Jul 2026, 05:35 UTC119 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @Qalblartarjimoni

1940 йилларда австриялик таниқли психиатр Рене Шпиц инсон боласи учун меҳр ва ҳиссий боғланиш нақадар муҳим эканини исботлаш мақсадида оғир, аммо илм-фан тарихида туб бурилиш ясаган бир тадқиқот ўтказди. У узоқ муддат давомида гўдаклардан иборат иккита алоҳида гуруҳни кузатув остига олди. Биринчи гуруҳ — жиноят содир этган маҳкума оналарнинг фарзандлари эди. Улар оналари билан бирга қамоқхона муҳитида яшарди. Зиндон

🔥5

22 Jul 2026, 10:11 UTC195 views24 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Болалигимни анча тиниқ эслайман. Дадам велосипеднинг олдига олиб узоқ узоқларга айлантириб келгандилар🫠. Энди бўлса фарзандларимни великларига миндириб узоқдаги боғчасига ҳеч оғринмай олиб бориб келадилар... Фарзандларим ҳаётидаги "Ота" деган бўшлиқни тўлдириб, бахтли болалик бераётган Дадамлардан Аллоҳ рози бўлсин!!!

❤‍🔥10😍83👍2🦄1

22 Jul 2026, 06:27 UTC193 views21 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ажрашган эр собиқ хотинидан, аёл эса собиқ эридан ўч олиш мақсадида ўртадаги фарзанддан фойдаланиши тубанликнинг қайси даражаси эканини билмайман, аммо болага зарар бериб икки томон ҳам ютмаслигини аниқ биламан. Уч йил аввал ўғлимни давлат боғчасига рўйхатга қўйган эдим. Йўлланма чиқибди, 16 иш куни аввал. Лекин мен билан боғча маъмурияти боғлана олмаган. Тақдир ҳазилини кўринг, отаси билан боғланибди. Отаси

😢13😭3😱31🤯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @ChBurxon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Charos Burxon ijodi” (@ChBurxon), 151 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ChBurxon.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.