Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Sweet Dreams

Channel

Sweet Dreams

@ChannelDreams

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

154subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001350730190
TypeChannel
Username@ChannelDreams
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded15 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ChannelDreams

Growth

15215415315 August 2026 — 152 subscribers15 August 2026 — 152 subscribers16 August 2026 — 153 subscribers1 September 2026 — 154 subscribers15 August 20261 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 17 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 152–154 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 06:36154+1
16 Aug 2026, 06:47153+1
15 Aug 2026, 08:30152no change
15 Aug 2026, 08:20152first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 20 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.84%
avg views ÷ 154 subscribers
Avg views / post
9.0
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
44.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held19 (20 December 202514 August 2026)
Views total18
Reactions total8
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

40 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🌚2152.5%
👍1127.5%
❤‍🔥717.5%
🕊12.50%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 December 2025 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 20:45 UTC4 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥2🌚1

Signed الف.ع

14 Aug 2026, 08:50 UTC14 views5 reactionsread 15 August 2026

این یه عادت فراگیر و همگانی شده. این که می‌گن:«قسمت نبود.» یا «قسمت نیست.» این جمله جایگزین خیلی چیزها می‌شه. عادلانه نیست. ربط دادن زمینی‌ترین خواسته به عوامل آسمانی عادلانه نیست. چرا باید نرسیدن به زمینی‌ترین خواسته‌ها «قسمت» نباشه؟ این گزاره‌ها کاری می‌کنن که وقتی در نتیجه‌ی تلاشِ بی حدت (که بقیه بهش می‌گن «کله شقی» یا «سر به هوایی») بالاخره به خواسته‌ت می‌رسی، می‌بینی هیچ ذوق و شوری نداری که بری سمتش. فقط بهش رسی

👍4🌚1

Signed الف.ع

4 Jul 2026, 22:11 UTC67 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026

هر ایده‌ای که به ذهن می‌رسه نباید اجرا بشه. ایده‌هایی هم که اجرا می‌شن لزوماً خوب نیستن. ایده‌ای که اجرا می‌شه و خوبه لزوماً مورد پسند واقع نمی‌شه. پس از ایده تا موفقیت راه زیادیه.

🌚1

Signed الف.ع

4 Jul 2026, 22:08 UTC66 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026

اعترافات حذف شد. ضعیف بود. شاید دلیلی داشته که پیداش نمی‌کردم. ممکنه در آینده بعد از چند بازنویسی دوباره بذارمش. شایدم هیچوقت.

🌚1

Signed الف.ع

2 Jun 2026, 20:21 UTC127 views4 reactionsread 15 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥3🌚1

Signed الف.ع

2 Jun 2026, 20:11 UTC130 views2 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

بعضی صحنه‌ها همیشه تو ذهنم می‌مونن. مثل درختی که به‌خاطر وزشِ بادِ تند به سمتی کج شده. اولش متوجه نمی‌شم چرا صحنه‌هایی مثل این برام خاصه. تو ناخودآگاهمه. حتی تو پروفایل کانال هم هست. ولی یک چیزی که فهمیدم اینه: با کندوکاوِ کافی، هرچیزی می‌تونه بیاد تو خودآگاه.. از باد خوشم نمیاد؛ برام نماد آزار و اذیت‌های زندگیه. نمودِ این رنج‌ها رو می‌شه تو درختی که کج شده دید.

❤‍🔥1🌚1

Signed الف.ع

31 May 2026, 21:02 UTC103 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026

شمارهٔ ۱ اعترافات رو خیلی وقته نوشتم. قبل از جنگ. قبل از عید. دیشب دوباره دلم خواست بیام اینجا، اما نمی‌دونستم نسخه دست‌نویسش رو کجا گذاشتم. نیمه‌شب مثل دیوونه‌ها کاغذها رو بهم می‌زدم، کتاب‌هارو پرت می‌کردم، از کمدم جعبه‌های کتاب‌هام رو بیرون کشیدم و زیرورو کردم. پیداش نکردم. نمی‌دونید چه حس بدی داره. می‌دونستم دیگه نمی‌تونم بنویمش. امکان نداره بتونم دقیقا همون رو بنویسم. امشب موقع کار کردن با کامپیوترم دیدم تو دسکتا

🌚1

Signed الف.ع

31 May 2026, 20:53 UTC87 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026

درود، امیدوارم خوب و سلامت باشید؛ با وجود همه‌ی اتفاقاتی که افتاده. از روده‌درازی خوشم نمیاد. چیزایی که باید رو هم من می‌دونم هم شما می‌دونید. فقط دلم به این خوش هستش که می‌تونم دوباره اینجا بنویسم. همین. ۰۵/۰۳/۱۱

🌚1

Signed الف.ع

31 May 2026, 20:53 UTC177 views2 reactionsread 15 August 2026

نوشته به دلیل نداشتن کیفیت مطلوب حذف شد.

❤‍🔥1🌚1

Signed الف.ع

8 Feb 2026, 17:56 UTC132 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026

راستی اگر اخیرا به آهنگ‌های خوبی برخوردید تو ربات بفرستید.

👍2🌚1

Signed الف.ع

8 Feb 2026, 17:55 UTC130 views4 reactionsread 15 August 2026

در حال حاضر، برام آسون‌ترین راه برای نوشتن، جریانی مثل «کاغذ پاره‌های سرگردان» هستش. از راه دیگه‌ای نمی‌تونم بدون خط‌خطی کردن کاغذ بنویسم. دارم به اسمِ این مسیر جدید فکر می‌کنم. اول «شبِ لاجوردی» اومد به ذهنم؛ اما دیدم برای شرایط امروز زیادی لطیفه. بعد «اعترافات» و چیزهایی دیگه رسید به ذهنم. اسمش رو انتخاب کنم شروع به نوشتن می‌کنم. بهتره که هرچه زودتر شروع به نوشتن کنم. وقتی نمی‌نویسم موجود پلید و هولناکی می‌شم که خو

👍3🌚1

Signed الف.ع

25 Jan 2026, 18:13 UTC150 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026

و از این کلنجارِ بین خیر و شر، از این نبردِ تن به تنِ داخل ذهنم که گرد و خاکش از ابرها هم بالاتر رفته فقط وقتی نجات پیدا می‌کنم که داخل کلاس هستم. فقط وقت‌هایی آرومم که با شاگردهام مدت کوتاهی دور همیم. اونا یه زبان خارجی رو از من یاد می‌گیرن و من هم زیبایی‌های جادوی «تدریس» و حس خوب «معلم» بودن رو فرا می‌گیرم. این تنها زمانی هستش که عطر یاس و نسترن به مشامم می‌خوره. زمان‌های دیگه‌ام که می‌دونید... دود، گوگرد، باروت و

🌚2👍1

Signed الف.ع

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ChannelDreams. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

عکس هایی که لازم دارید:
@profileham · 102,509
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sweet Dreams” (@ChannelDreams), 154 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ChannelDreams.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.