Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CharlieKirkArchives

Channel

CharlieKirkArchives

@CharlieKirkArchives

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

412subscribers

+22 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002657130610
TypeChannel
Username@CharlieKirkArchives
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/CharlieKirkArchives

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3904124016 August 2026 — 390 subscribers7 August 2026 — 390 subscribers14 August 2026 — 398 subscribers20 August 2026 — 400 subscribers3 September 2026 — 404 subscribers11 September 2026 — 409 subscribers19 September 2026 — 412 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 43 days, net +22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 387–415 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 00:21412+3
11 Sept 2026, 14:00409+5
3 Sept 2026, 10:59404+4
20 Aug 2026, 16:24400+2
14 Aug 2026, 03:14398+8
7 Aug 2026, 01:18390no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:03390first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

104 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯5149.0%
🔥1615.4%
👍1211.5%
🤮1110.6%
😡65.77%
43.85%
10.962%
👏10.962%
🤬10.962%
🤯10.962%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 104 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 18:40 UTC25 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @RealWorldNewsChannelVideo

"It’s time for Erika to start answering some serious questions." Stew Peters claims Erika Kirk is linked to the Mossad. ⏯️ @RealWorldNewsChannel ✳️ @RealWorldNewsChat

💯1

6 Aug 2026, 17:24 UTC27 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @inmagnaexcitatioPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

💯3🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 22:00 UTC50 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Isn’t it weird how X’s summary of the work done by @AnaEscobarShow & @realstewpeters run a headline about the “Egyptian jet” when the link is to Hebrew Google searches and Israel? Almost as if this app, along with all media, shields jews and Israel? Weird. https://x.com/IanMalcolm84/status/2085096190110994767 🕊@CharlieKirkArchives

🔥3🤮1

5 Aug 2026, 21:57 UTC53 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📑 ANOMALIES LIST - UPDATED. https://x.com/pattygifflaw/status/2083543259800829978 🕊@CharlieKirkArchives

🔥3👏1

5 Aug 2026, 21:55 UTC49 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

JAKEGTV @jakeg_official Working on my next JakeGTV News episode covering Erika Kirk, Tyler Robinson, and the Charlie Kirk assassination. What's the ONE thing you think I absolutely need to include? Clips. Interviews. Court moments. Timeline details. Archived posts. News coverage. Anything important or overlooked. Noticers, drop it in the comments. 👇 https://x.com/jakeg_official/status/2084833828431147462 🕊@Char

👍3

5 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC52 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Right after the assassination of Charlie Kirk, people are fleeing, believing a shot has been fired. Apparently, the sound of a gunshot was amplified over the speakers. They’re good, but not *that* good; the assassins have been exposed. see ⏭️ https://x.com/irlandarra2019/status/2085054924505674131 🕊@CharlieKirkArchives

👍31

5 Aug 2026, 05:05 UTC55 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

https://x.com/i/status/2084675071130423697 🕊@CharlieKirkArchives

🤮4

5 Aug 2026, 01:45 UTC169 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Candace Owens @RealCandaceO Yes. My suspicion is the gloves came from Brian’s bag. Would be an item expected in a medical kit. 💥💥💥 SOLVED? IS THIS WHY THERE WERE BLACK GLOVES IN CHARLIE'S SUV? The FBI's evidence response team wore black nitrile gloves that day; the Utah Department of Public Safety wore white gloves. @RealCandaceO If those *are* used evidence collection gloves, it's almost certainly a breach of

🔥2👍1

4 Aug 2026, 22:52 UTC63 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Andrew Kolvet pretended to be ignorant about Fort Huachuca, despite his family’s direct connection to the military base. Why would he do that? 👀 https://x.com/NihiloX/status/2084770756886483362 🕊@CharlieKirkArchives

💯11

4 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC189 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

No ambulances, no medics, no first aid , no CPR The medics were right there, but they weren't allowed to intervene. It’s because they want to prevent anyone from touching Charlie’s body, since it is the primary piece of evidence of the crime. The security guys are seizing the body because they killed him. https://x.com/irlandarra2019/status/2084171087030411582 🕊@CharlieKirkArchives

💯10🤯1

4 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC85 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Why does the gun story keep changing in the case against Tyler Robinson? https://x.com/ImBreckWorsham/status/2084653938956005820 🕊@CharlieKirkArchives

🔥7

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @CharlieKirkArchives. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CharlieKirkArchives” (@CharlieKirkArchives), 412 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CharlieKirkArchives.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.