ура я типа крутая да?
custom 530336064713055244112🌭7custom 52041159186988682162❤1❤🔥1custom 54021287458614964121

Channel
@CheburRant
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
253subscribers
+70 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003727563804 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CheburRant |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CheburRant |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 00:37 | 253 | +5 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 07:58 | 248 | +7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:16 | 241 | +13 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 228 | +41 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 187 | +4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 183 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 183 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
350 reactions across 20 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🌭 | 158 | 45.1% | |
| ❤ | 90 | 25.7% | |
| 💘 | 22 | 6.29% | |
| ❤🔥 | 18 | 5.14% | |
| custom 5303360647130552441 | 12 | 3.43% | |
| 😢 | 12 | 3.43% | |
| custom 5204115918698868216 | 11 | 3.14% | |
| 🐳 | 4 | 1.14% | |
| 🍌 | 3 | 0.857% | |
| 🍓 | 3 | 0.857% | |
| custom 5402128745861496412 | 2 | 0.571% | |
| custom 5472173464821439380 | 2 | 0.571% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 0.571% | |
| 💊 | 2 | 0.571% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 0.571% | |
| custom 5303181851936985302 | 1 | 0.286% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.286% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.286% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 0.286% | |
| 😨 | 1 | 0.286% | |
| 2 further kinds | 2 | 0.571% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 350 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ура я типа крутая да?
custom 530336064713055244112🌭7custom 52041159186988682162❤1❤🔥1custom 54021287458614964121
я сделала гомункула
🌭14❤9❤🔥1🍓1💘1custom 52041159186988682161custom 54021287458614964121
Я скоро пойду вешаться с этим огрызком одноглазой вряд ли смогу сделать рабочую модельку ее, НО Я ПОПЫТАЮСЬ
❤7🌭7custom 52041159186988682162
Я же вам говорила, что в новом ролике я похожа на сектанта
🌭13custom 52041159186988682164❤1❤🔥1💘1🥴1
🌭
🌭37❤🔥4🍌3❤1🐳1💊1🗿1custom 53031818519369853021
Этот ролик за два дня набрал больше чем я ожидала я в шоке
🌭18💘7❤4💊1
Четыре часа сидела, говорила с ней и потом сразу документ собирала этот, чтобы красиво и читабельно было Наконец сяду поем за весь день нормально Самое забавное, что я сегодня планировала в майн поиграть чуток и в блендере сидеть и фигней маятся (делать 3д модельку своего скина) А тут опля и Финни пришла)) Хотя не жалуюсь, мне было очень интересно слушать ее
🌭10❤2❤🔥2
После выхода моего ролика о Grace со мной связалась Fynnee! Участница той самой драмы. Она была не против со мной поговорить и ответить на несколько моих вопросов. Разговор вышел достаточно большим, поэтому я создала документ с нашим диалогом. Также я считаю, что в конфликтах ВСЕГДА нужно услышать обе стороны. Сторону Финни почти никто не смог услышать и я даже не знала, что существует ответный документ с ее защитой…
❤4🌭3❤🔥1
Забавно, что Тимоха решил, что Саймон к тому же педофил Потому что не понял, что Финне БЫЛО 14 ЛЕТ 2 ГОДА НАЗАД 🔥🔥 На данный момент девушке 17. Они с Саймоном +- одногодки
🌭6❤2💘2😨1
Это кто тут такой реакт на мой ролик делает 👀... Хмхмхм
❤8💘3🌭2❤🔥1👀1custom 52041159186988682161custom 54721734648214393801
Пока я начну составлять документ со скринами разговора Я кину сюда документ с которым поделилась со мной Финни. Это документ с защитой от ее друга https://docs.google.com/document/d/1w76ADj4hMKur9zQbKiZY8tdEMfDJVQVf1ROW1K8A_0o/preview?tab=t.0
🌭2❤1
В тгк я кину диалог с ней, когда все обсудим Предложите в коммах куда скрины диалога сложить. Гугл документ может быть?
❤5🌭2🐳1🕊1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CheburRant. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какую анимку купить?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Одноглазая высказалась” (@CheburRant), 253 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CheburRant.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.