Channel
@CheccoElias
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
178subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001728365341 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CheccoElias |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 19 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CheccoElias |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:36 | 178 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 179 | no change |
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:01 | 179 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 18 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3 reactions across 1 post, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 66.7% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 24 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📌📻🔌 'Conexión 360' | Científicos rusos sorprenden con un filtro más eficiente que cualquier otro Lo que parece un simple filtro podría convertirse en una herramienta decisiva para millones de personas. Científicos rusos diseñaron una tecnología capaz de capturar contaminantes y sustancias tóxicas, acercando un escenario donde el agua limpia sea más accesible. 🎤 Por Alberto García. 📍 Escucha el programa completo e…
Signed Elias Checco
❗🇷🇺 Imágenes desde Starobelsk: más de 50 periodistas extranjeros han llegado al lugar del ataque terrorista del régimen de Kiev contra un colegio en la República Popular de Lugansk. Hoy han llegado a Starobelsk representantes de medios de comunicación de 19 países: Austria, Brasil, Reino Unido, Hungría, Venezuela, Alemania, Grecia, España, Italia, Catar, China, Cuba, Líbano, Emiratos Árabes Unidos, Pakistán, Estados…
👍2❤1
Signed Elias Checco
🥀Los familiares de los estudiantes fallecidos en Starobelsk acudieron al lugar de la tragedia con retratos de las víctimas. Anteriormente, allí habían sido llevados más de 50 periodistas extranjeros. ❗️Como resultado del atentado terrorista de las Fuerzas Armadas de Ucrania, recordemos, murieron 21 personas. En total, más de 60 niños resultaron heridos, informó la comisionada para los derechos humanos de Rusia, Yana…
Signed Elias Checco
🥀En Starobelsk, la gente lleva flores bajo la lluvia al monumento improvisado a las víctimas del ataque de Kiev. El área sigue acordonada. El Comité de Investigación está trabajando. Las autoridades de la república popular de Lugansk han declarado hoy y mañana dos días de luto en memoria de las víctimas del ataque al albergue del colegio pedagógico que dejó a 21 muertos y más de 40 heridos. @ucraniando
Signed Elias Checco
🔴 Tragedia en Starobelsk: relato de una sobreviviente del ataque de las Fuerzas Armadas de Ucrania contra la residencia estudiantil Para atacar a los niños, el enemigo utilizó armas con el sistema de navegación por satélite "Starlink", según informan los expertos. 📺 En el video, una testigo cuenta detalles de los ataques y cómo lograron salvarse. Traducido y subtitulado por el equipo @ucraniando 👍Suscríbete a Uc…
Signed Elias Checco
НЕНАВИЖУ Вы знаете, как выглядит скотство, блядство и фарисейство? Вот так. Основные европейские лидеры выступили с заявлениями, осуждающими обстрел Киева. Глава евродипломатии Каллас, например, заявила, что усилит давление на Россию из-за удара "Орешником". "Сообщается, что Москва использует баллистические ракеты средней дальности "Орешник" - системы, предназначенные для несения ядерных боеголовок. Это политиче…
Signed Elias Checco
🚀🔥🇺🇦 Además de otro lanzamiento demostrativo del Oreshnik, contra objetivos en Kiev fueron lanzados misiles Iskander, misiles hipersónicos Zircon, misiles de crucero y decenas de drones Geranio. Prácticamente se está utilizando casi toda la gama de armamento. La única pregunta es cuál es exactamente el objetivo. @Irinamar_Z 🇷🇺
Signed Elias Checco
⚡️Число погибших из-за чудовищного преступления ВСУ увеличилось до 21, поисковые работы завершены, сообщили в МЧС. Все тела погибших извлечены из-под завалов. Всего из-за удара пострадали 63 человека.
Signed Elias Checco
#раскладка Орешник таки прилетел по Белой Церкви. Прилетел по подземным объектам. Как видим били не ради пиара, а цель очень весомая. Уточняем, что именно вынесли.
Signed Elias Checco
Анна Кувычко - Дядя Вова, мы с тобой! 🇷🇺✌️
Signed Elias Checco
https://t.me/mash?livestream
Signed Elias Checco
https://t.me/SputnikMundo?livestream
Signed Elias Checco
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @CheccoElias. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Checco Elias” (@CheccoElias), 178 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CheccoElias.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.