Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ChelseaFC Blues

Channel

ChelseaFC Blues

@ChelseaFC_Bluess

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,534subscribers

+29 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001827129342
TypeChannel
Username@ChelseaFC_Bluess
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ChelseaFC_Bluess

Growth

1,5051,5371,5217 August 2026 — 1,505 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,505 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,507 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,512 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,516 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,511 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,514 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,515 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,523 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,529 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,537 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,532 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,534 subscribers1,5347 August 202610 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 35 days, net +29. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,500–1,542 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 23:581,534+2
5 Sept 2026, 21:001,532-5
1 Sept 2026, 10:051,537+8
29 Aug 2026, 14:441,529+6
26 Aug 2026, 21:341,523+8
24 Aug 2026, 00:561,515+1
20 Aug 2026, 18:131,514+3
17 Aug 2026, 20:591,511-5
15 Aug 2026, 01:081,516+4
11 Aug 2026, 07:281,512+5
8 Aug 2026, 03:361,507+2
7 Aug 2026, 04:161,505no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:031,505first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 27 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

428 reactions across 26 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15335.7%
👍8820.6%
🔥5913.8%
👎358.18%
🤣214.91%
👏204.67%
🥰194.44%
💔102.34%
😁102.34%
🤩61.40%
💩40.935%
❤‍🔥20.467%
🤔10.234%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 428 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:40 UTC219 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

تصویر لو رفته از معارفه رسمی پپ چاواریا در کوبهام ⚡️ @ChelseaFC_Bluess

👏6

Signed Ali Terry26

7 Aug 2026, 13:53 UTC339 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚨ژابی آلونسو : " من از داشتن رابرت سانچز و مایک پندرز، بسیار خوشحالم. راب باتجربه است و من از داشتن چنین اطمینان خاطری درون دروازه خوشحالم!." ⚡️ @ChelseaFC_Bluess

8👎8

Signed Ali Terry26

7 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC412 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

مارکو : "پوشیدن پیراهن چلسی حس فوق‌العاده‌ای را به من داده، صادقانه می‌گویم. می‌دانم که این فقط بازی‌های پیش‌فصل هستند، بنابراین اهمیتشان به اندازه زمانی که لیگ برتر آغاز می‌شود نیست، اما باز هم احساس فوق‌العاده‌ای است که نماینده این باشگاه و این نشان باشم." "بیشتر وقتم را با آرون [آنسلمینو] گذرانده‌ام. با هم وقت می‌گذرانیم و بازی‌های پلی‌استیشن انجام می‌دهیم، یا شاید وقتی که تمرین نمی‌کنیم یا استراحت می‌کنیم، تنیس

16

Signed Ali Terry26

7 Aug 2026, 08:36 UTC450 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ترکیب اصلی فصل ۲۰۲۶/۲۷ تحت هدایت ژابی آلونسو؟🤔👌 کاش جای سانچز، امیلیانو مارتینز بود ⚡️ @ChelseaFC_Bluess

25👎2

Signed Ali Terry26

7 Aug 2026, 08:06 UTC457 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

نیزار کینسلا : باشگاه چلسی تمایل دارد تعداد بازیکنان خود را از ۴۱ نفر به تعداد کمتری کاهش دهد و برای رعایت محدودیت ۲۵ نفره لیگ برتر، باید ۱۶ بازیکن را به فروش برساند. چلسی در بازی مقابل یوونتوس، ۲۱ بازیکن ذخیره در ترکیب خود داشت. پنج بازیکن – بنوا بادیاییل، دیوید داترو فوفانا، آکسل دیزاسی، مارک گییو و کالب وایلی – در حال حاضر در تمرینات تیم اصلی شرکت نمی‌کنند، زیرا نام آن‌ها در فهرست فروش قرار دارد. در همین حال، ه

😁10🔥5

Signed Ali Terry26

7 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTC457 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚨دیلی میل : چلسی و بایرن مونیخ در تلاش برای جذب مورگان گیبس-وایت هستند. هر دو باشگاه از تغییر اخیر مدیر برنامه‌های این بازیکن استقبال کرده‌اند، و به نظر می‌رسد چلسی به طور ویژه به جذب او علاقه‌مند است. نوچینگام فارست هیچ برنامه‌ای برای فروش این بازیکن ندارد، مگر اینکه پیشنهاد بسیار جذابی دریافت کند. ⚡️ @ChelseaFC_Bluess

17👎4

Signed Ali Terry26

7 Aug 2026, 07:05 UTC452 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

فابریزیو رومانو : پپ چاواریا امروز به سمت انگلیس پرواز می‌کند تا در تست‌های پزشکی شرکت کند و سپس قراردادش را امضا کند ⚡️ @ChelseaFC_Bluess

🔥15

Signed Ali Terry26

7 Aug 2026, 06:05 UTC455 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

دو بازی بعدی چلسی در تور آسیا به فاصله یک روز! فردا با میلان و یکشنبه با جوهور ⚡️ @ChelseaFC_Bluess

8

Signed Ali Terry26

7 Aug 2026, 03:56 UTC491 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚨 فابریزیو رومانو : Here We Go ✅#غیر_رسمی : پپ چاواریا به چلسی پیوست چلسی و رایو وایکانو بر سر ۱۹ میلیون یورو ثابت + ۲ میلیون پاداش بع توافق کامل رسیدند پپ بزودی راهی لندن می‌شود تا در تست‌های پزشکی شرکت کند و سپس قراردادش را امضا کند معامله انجام شد ⚡️ @ChelseaFC_Bluess

19

Signed Ali Terry26

6 Aug 2026, 20:53 UTC516 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

مایک مکگرث خبرنگار تلگراف : درحال حاضر هیجان‌انگیز ترین خرید چلسی ، آستین مک‌فی است!. ⚡️ @ChelseaFC_Bluess

🥰19🤩6

Signed Ali Terry26

6 Aug 2026, 20:11 UTC484 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @PremierLeague_IraniPhoto

🥇 جانلوکا دی‌مارتزیو + 🥈 لوکا بندونی 🚨 انزو مارسکا رویای همکاری دوباره با انزو فرناندز در منچستر سیتی را در سر دارد؛ دو نفری که دوران موفقی را در چلسی کنار همدیگر سپری کردند. 🚨 درصورتیکه رودری به جدایی نزدیک‌تر شود، هافبک آرژانتینی چلسی می‌تواند به یکی از اهداف اصلی سیتی تبدیل شود. با این حال، هنوز مشخص نیست که عملی‌شدن چنین انتقالی تا چه اندازه امکان‌پذیر است. 🆔 @PremierLeagueIR

👎9👍21👏1

Signed Ali Terry26

6 Aug 2026, 08:50 UTC535 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

بن جاکوبز : به نظر من، باشگاه چلسی احتمالاً برای پدرو نتو، مبلغی در حدود 70 میلیون پوند درخواست خواهد کرد.» ⚡️ @ChelseaFC_Bluess

👎113

Signed Ali Terry26

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @ChelseaFC_Bluess. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

هواداران چلسی | Chelsea
@Chelsea_TM · 46,699
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 28 August 2026
Chelsea FC 🔵
@CFC_ChelseaFC · 137,483
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
Goal Videos
@EuropeanFootball_GoalVideos · 39,034
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 31 August 2026
Moosighi Popular
@moosighi_popular · 34,230
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 3 September 2026
فابریتزیو رومانو | Fabrizio Romano
@FabirizioRomano · 68,944
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 19 August 2026
CHELSEA ANALYSIS 📈🔵
@ChelseaAnalysis · 47,610
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ChelseaFC Blues” (@ChelseaFC_Bluess), 1,534 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ChelseaFC_Bluess.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.