Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 蜘蛛巢穴

Channel

蜘蛛巢穴

@ChineseNest

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,450subscribers

-49 since we began measuring on 17 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002080359039
TypeChannel
Username@ChineseNest
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded17 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ChineseNest

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,4501,4991,474.517 August 2026 — 1,499 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,498 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,496 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,489 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,484 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,481 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,478 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,466 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,456 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,450 subscribers17 August 202615 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 29 days, net -49. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,443–1,506 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 11:171,450-6
11 Sept 2026, 13:391,456-10
6 Sept 2026, 23:361,466-12
2 Sept 2026, 02:341,478-3
30 Aug 2026, 11:481,481-3
27 Aug 2026, 16:521,484-5
25 Aug 2026, 01:141,489-7
21 Aug 2026, 04:431,496-2
18 Aug 2026, 07:231,498-1
17 Aug 2026, 23:151,499first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 3 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

45 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2044.4%
❤1328.9%
🍾613.3%
😁36.67%
💩24.44%
🤮12.22%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 3 March 2025 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 09:44 UTCviews —

The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 28 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

9 Mar 2025, 11:22 UTC≈10,600 views8 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Poll

观看作品更倾向于

  1. 纯爱60%
  2. ntr40%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🍾6❤1🤮1

9 Mar 2025, 11:08 UTC≈10,500 views3 reactionsread 17 August 2026

平庸的人最大缺点是常常觉得自己比别人高明。 缺少谦虚就是缺少见识。 绝望毁了一些人,而傲慢毁了许多人。(小编:这简直就是我) —— #本杰明富兰克林

❤2👍1

9 Mar 2025, 11:06 UTC≈10,000 views4 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

#比亚迪 成功的内因是 #主体性 认为一家万亿人民币市值的公司不成功是非理性且傲慢的

👍3❤1

9 Mar 2025, 01:53 UTC≈8,370 viewsread 17 August 2026
Poll

你对中国的认识

  1. 处于浪人群体的前50%54%
  2. 后50%46%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Mar 2025, 09:39 UTC≈7,800 views3 reactionsread 17 August 2026

比亚迪给摩托罗拉供货这个信号被李录捕捉到了 比亚迪被巴菲特投资的信号你捕捉到了吗 招聘市场鲸吞理工科毕业生的信号你捕捉到了吗 比亚迪7天从零造出口罩机的信号你捕捉到了吗(掌握第一性原理(物理、化学、工程)的公司有多可怕) 和拼多多一样被网上吐槽血汗工厂的信号(注重效率)你捕捉到了吗 这一切我都视而不见了,王传福的评分是13.0,我的评分是-13.0

👍3

6 Mar 2025, 11:26 UTC≈7,120 views3 reactionsread 17 August 2026

陷入“可恶的他人”和“可怜的自己”中一点用都没有,也许有人安慰“哎呀他好可恶啊,你好可怜啊”会给你一些慰藉,但是之后你并没有摆脱这两个念头,反而加深了。 重要的是“接下来该怎么办?”,过去不存在,存在的只有现在和带着过去回忆的你。 段永平说:“你永远都有选择”,过去已无法改变,沉湎其中有何意义,不如关注自己能够控制的,让未来变得更好。 #阿德勒

💩2❤1

6 Mar 2025, 10:18 UTC≈5,950 views7 reactionsread 17 August 2026

感恩为什么会助人成长提升? 可能是它帮助人们摆脱了受害者心态。 受害者心态导致内心匮乏,导致行动上的自私。 感恩行为强化了人对接受外部帮助的认知,水满自溢,更愿意以行动回报社会 然后根据社会的规则,付出的人更可能获得他人的感谢和回报 #感恩

❤7

5 Mar 2025, 04:09 UTC≈4,840 viewsread 17 August 2026

在读书上,数量并不列于首位,重要的是书的品质与所引起思索的强度。 #本杰明富兰克林

4 Mar 2025, 11:23 UTC≈4,490 viewsread 17 August 2026

二零一几年的时候,400多元/克抢购黄金的大妈被嘲笑 #随想

4 Mar 2025, 11:14 UTC≈4,340 views3 reactionsread 17 August 2026

1998年颁布的《土地管理法》规定,土地出让金包括土地补偿、安置费、青苗费等。土地补偿金为被征收土地原用途前三年收入的6-10倍,安置补偿为4-6倍,二者加起来不得超过30倍。可以看出这和市场价毫无关系,说是强买也不为过。 转手就以”招拍挂“(招标、拍卖、挂牌)形式以市场价卖出 蜘蛛巢穴 #土地

😁3

4 Mar 2025, 10:54 UTC≈3,850 viewsread 17 August 2026

以前我计算完估值后总是懒得写投资笔记,就这样我忘记了很多估值结果也进行过很多重复计算,现在这种事再也不会发生了

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @ChineseNest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Mar 2025, 11:22 UTCAnonymous Poll872 voters

观看作品更倾向于

  1. 纯爱60%
  2. ntr40%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Mar 2025, 01:53 UTCAnonymous Poll351 voters

你对中国的认识

  1. 处于浪人群体的前50%54%
  2. 后50%46%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 3 March 2025 to 15 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

敏感经济信息分享
@pelosi3 · 70,867
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 20 August 2026
学习墙国🐸
@XueXi_China · 87,338
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 17 August 2026
【李老师不是你老师】官方电报
@lilaoshibushinilaoshi · 48,585
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“蜘蛛巢穴” (@ChineseNest), 1,450 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ChineseNest.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.