Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝙴𝚛𝚖𝚎𝚜 𝙲𝚑𝚘𝚜𝚘'𝚜 𝚕𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚛 彡

Channel

𝙴𝚛𝚖𝚎𝚜 𝙲𝚑𝚘𝚜𝚘'𝚜 𝚕𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚛 彡

@Chososkitten

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

223subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002465382368
TypeChannel
Username@Chososkitten
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Chososkitten

Growth

21722322012 August 2026 — 217 subscribers13 August 2026 — 217 subscribers20 August 2026 — 220 subscribers28 August 2026 — 221 subscribers5 September 2026 — 223 subscribers12 August 20265 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 24 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 216–224 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 14:57223+2
28 Aug 2026, 04:32221+1
20 Aug 2026, 07:12220+3
13 Aug 2026, 02:24217no change
12 Aug 2026, 14:16217first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
40.4%
avg views ÷ 223 subscribers
Avg views / post
90.0
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
35.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held12 (17 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total270
Reactions total79
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

646 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 534394394343431103922034.1%
custom 534155321860845971816525.5%
custom 534354857880981073516325.2%
custom 53435694566458383889815.2%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 646 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
19
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 12 we hold a reading for · 42%
Most on one post
15
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Chososkitten. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 21:36 UTC46 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🐠Сегодня мой день рождения!🤩•°. 🐠 🐠Спасибо всем моим ЛПШЕЧКАМ и ПОДПИСЧИКАМ за то что вы все это время были со мнойй🐠 Ну как говорится самый лучший подарок для художника это репост его работ хихи Подписаться 🌟🌟🌟

9 Aug 2026, 21:03 UTC100 views50 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

С днём рождения Луночка🤩

custom 534155321860845971820custom 534394394343431103915custom 534354857880981073512custom 53435694566458383883

8 Aug 2026, 18:19 UTC124 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Скоро дроп клянусь оживу, у меня просто абсолютный моральный распад, отдых и снова распад

custom 534394394343431103915custom 53435485788098107358custom 53435694566458383886

5 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTC193 views85 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Я на морях

custom 534356945664583838835custom 534394394343431103927custom 534354857880981073523

30 Jul 2026, 17:36 UTC265 views81 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

🤩𝑁𝑒𝑤 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡🤩 Спасибо большое милой гса, мне очень очень понравилось🌟 🤍🤍🤍🤍 #арт #селфсона

custom 534394394343431103932custom 534354857880981073526custom 534155321860845971821custom 53435694566458383882

28 Jul 2026, 13:14 UTC232 views72 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

🤩𝑁𝑒𝑤 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡🤩 Небольшая нагота юч от Аскады Кр @malicebuddha 🤍🤍🤍🤍 #арт #селфшип

custom 534155321860845971829custom 534394394343431103923custom 534354857880981073520

25 Jul 2026, 20:34 UTC252 views77 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Нас 25 тысяч и мы идем обниматься

custom 534155321860845971830custom 534394394343431103926custom 534354857880981073521

25 Jul 2026, 20:33 UTC197 views82 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Мне офф плюшки с Японии приехали

custom 534155321860845971833custom 534394394343431103927custom 534354857880981073522

21 Jul 2026, 11:56 UTC216 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @SometimesMusicsaVes0

Posted without readable text

custom 53439439434343110393

20 Jul 2026, 10:45 UTC242 views76 reactions15 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🤩𝑁𝑒𝑤 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡🤩 Моя часть летнего коллаба 🤍🤍🤍🤍 #арт #селфсона Спасибо за звездочки🤩

custom 534356945664583838828custom 534394394343431103922custom 534354857880981073520custom 53415532186084597186

17 Jul 2026, 23:18 UTC301 views91 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🤩𝑁𝑒𝑤 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡🤩 Чибики 🤍🤍🤍🤍 #арт #селфшип

custom 534394394343431103930custom 534155321860845971826custom 534356945664583838824custom 534354857880981073511

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @Chososkitten. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝙴𝚛𝚖𝚎𝚜 𝙲𝚑𝚘𝚜𝚘'𝚜 𝚕𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚛 彡” (@Chososkitten), 223 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Chososkitten.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.