Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ⎯⎯꯭ֹ𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿 𝗖𝗵𝘂𝗰𝗸 ::

Channel

⎯⎯꯭ֹ𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿 𝗖𝗵𝘂𝗰𝗸 ::

@Chuck_ShurIey

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

26subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003825967951
TypeChannel
Username@Chuck_ShurIey
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 18 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Chuck_ShurIey

Growth

262927.512 August 2026 — 29 subscribers13 August 2026 — 29 subscribers20 August 2026 — 27 subscribers4 September 2026 — 26 subscribers12 August 20264 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 22 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26–29 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 03:0226-1
20 Aug 2026, 23:2927-2
13 Aug 2026, 00:0129no change
12 Aug 2026, 23:4929first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

79 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53822475398168076272329.1%
custom 53821270316244163081924.1%
1924.1%
🕊911.4%
👍22.53%
💔22.53%
😇22.53%
11.27%
💋11.27%
😐11.27%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 05:34 UTC26 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026

➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ ➖🤍🌟 последнее время стало непривычно тихо. Настолько тихо, что даже я начинаю задумываться, не пропустил ли какую-то важную главу. Все отдыхают, буквально каждое существо словно решило сделать паузу, и после стольких событий это, конечно, приятно… но, если честно, становится немного скучно. Пожалуй, пора снова взяться за сюжет. Истории не могут ждать вечно, особенно если читателям нечего обсуждать и жд

1custom 53821270316244163081custom 53822475398168076271

27 Jul 2026, 19:24 UTC39 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

➖🤍Конечно. Улица Пушкина, дом Колотушкина. квартира 3, где из окна горит божественный свет. Приходи после девяти часов вечера.

1🕊1custom 53821270316244163081custom 53822475398168076271

27 Jul 2026, 14:37 UTC33 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026

➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ ➖🤍⭐️едавно довелось увидеть ангелов. И, честно говоря, я до сих пор под впечатлением. Их свобода действий просто поражает. Они делают всё, что им вздумается, и складывается ощущение, что любые законы существуют где-то отдельно от них. В какой-то момент начинаешь задумываться, зачем вообще писать правила, если некоторые воспринимают их исключительно как декоративный элемент. 🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦 ➖🤍⭐️о

2🕊1custom 53821270316244163081custom 53822475398168076271

19 Jul 2026, 19:52 UTC49 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026

➖🤍Всё, думаю достаточно. Вместо того, чтоб в очередной раз удивляться тому, как люди тупеют на глазах, отправлюсь почитать или же напишу что-нибудь... умное. Как раз кстати.

2custom 53822475398168076272custom 53821270316244163081

19 Jul 2026, 19:34 UTC49 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

➖🤍 Прошу прощения. Я немного не проконтролировал. Надеюсь, вы ничего не видели и позор останется незамеченным, потому-что вышло довольно неловко.

2

18 Jul 2026, 19:06 UTC49 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026

➖🤍Что ж, это было немного не так, как себе представлял, учитывая, что Винчестеры опять раздули из мухи слона... но ничего удивительного, именно такими я их и прописывал. Сейчас действительно расслабляюсь и пью пиво, ведь даже бог способен устать. Особенно с такой дикой компанией.

2custom 53821270316244163082custom 53822475398168076272🕊1

18 Jul 2026, 18:42 UTC47 views9 reactionsread 13 August 2026

➖🤍Ну что, мой маленький ковбой, снимай свою шляпу и выходи на бой честный. Честно, устал я уже писать тут этот глупый сюжет и.. всё, что произошло, будем драться так: кто выпьет больше пива, тот и победил.

3custom 53822475398168076273custom 53821270316244163082🕊1

18 Jul 2026, 18:38 UTC39 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

➖🤍Победил самый влиятельный человек с самым влиятельным лайком.

1💔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Chuck_ShurIey. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⎯⎯꯭ֹ𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿 𝗖𝗵𝘂𝗰𝗸 ::” (@Chuck_ShurIey), 26 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Chuck_ShurIey.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.