Channel
@Cielos_Toxicos
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
824subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001775208154 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Cielos_Toxicos |
| Created | 22 December 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Cielos_Toxicos |
Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:58 | 824 | -5 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 22:18 | 829 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 14:57 | 828 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:58 | 829 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 827 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:27 | 827 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
20 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤬 | 16 | 80.0% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 15.0% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 5.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Análisis muestras del granizo caído sobre Funes, Santa Fe, Argentina, el 28 de Marzo 2025. Uno de los principales objetivos de la ingeniería del clima es el de ocultar la verdadera velocidad y gravedad del calentamiento del planeta, lo cual es llevado a cabo con enfriamientos de diseño, patentados procesos de nucleación química de hielo y de nieve. Los destrozos ocasionados, intencionales o no, son parte de la guerra…
👍3
Por la mañana, el pronóstico del tiempo para Córdoba mencionaba que se esperaba un día con "calima". Y lo tuvimos.
🤬3
Estos son tan sólo algunos de los aviones partícipes de estos planes "clandestinos" de manipulación climática que dispersaron nanopartículas tóxicas sobre Córdoba, por favor ayudar a generar conciencia en los demás documentando estas actividades y compartiendo en las redes sociales.
🤬2
Estos planes son globales y participan corporaciones y "gobiernos", nuestra única opción para intentar detenerlos es exponerlos ante la opinión pública cosa de generar un debate AZU 2080. Azul logística
🤬2
Geoingeniería "clandestina" sobre Córdoba capital , 26 Julio 2026. Aviones comerciales (sistemas de dispersión automatizados, los pilotos no deciden nada) dispersando nanopartículas sinérgicamente tóxicas (como ser bario y aluminio) sobre las desprevenidas poblaciones del centro de Argentina. Atlas Air GTI8052
🤬4
Geoingeniería "clandestina" sobre las (en muchos casos voluntariamente) desprevenidas poblaciones de Argentina. Primeros días de Julio 2026. Casi todas las aerolíneas comerciales participan de estas actividades, pueden comprobarlo con aplicaciones gratuitas como ser Flight Radar 24.
🤬5🤣1
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @Cielos_Toxicos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cielos Tóxicos” (@Cielos_Toxicos), 824 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Cielos_Toxicos.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.