Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝑆𝑖𝑙𝑣𝑒𝑟'𝑠 𝑚𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑙𝑖𝑏𝑟𝑎𝑟𝑦 🎠

Channel

𝑆𝑖𝑙𝑣𝑒𝑟'𝑠 𝑚𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑙𝑖𝑏𝑟𝑎𝑟𝑦 🎠

@Circuswonder

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,081subscribers

+62 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002136897943
TypeChannel
Username@Circuswonder
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Circuswonder

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,0191,0811,0509 August 2026 — 1,019 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,026 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,030 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,031 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,028 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,030 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,037 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,034 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,037 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,038 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,067 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,078 subscribers17 September 2026 — 1,081 subscribers9 August 202617 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 39 days, net +62. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,010–1,090 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 09:001,081+3
13 Sept 2026, 19:011,078+11
10 Sept 2026, 07:421,067+29
5 Sept 2026, 00:581,038+1
1 Sept 2026, 04:451,037+3
29 Aug 2026, 05:431,034-3
26 Aug 2026, 15:321,037+7
23 Aug 2026, 17:061,030+2
20 Aug 2026, 12:441,028-3
17 Aug 2026, 11:381,031+1
13 Aug 2026, 23:391,030+4
10 Aug 2026, 15:021,026+7
9 Aug 2026, 19:461,019first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 8 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

182 reactions across 14 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥14177.5%
🍓4122.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 182 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC51 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @mybookwormshitPhoto

𝖡𝗎𝖽𝖽𝗒 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝖽𝗂𝗇𝗀 '𝖥𝖺𝗂𝗋𝗒𝖽𝖺𝗅𝖾' 𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁 𝗆𝗒 𝖿𝖺𝗏𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗍𝖾 𝖻𝗎𝖽𝖽𝗒 ✨‍

🍓11

9 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC237 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

32% خوندم تا اینجا یه نظر کوچولو بدم؟ خود رمنسش، اسلو برنش و Yearning ش فوق العادست!!! آقایی که اصننننننن 🛐✨ ۱۰/۱۰ ولی خود داستان چیز اونقدر متفاوت و خاصی نیست تا اینجا. قشنگه...ولی همش حس می‌کنم یچیزی کم داره. مثلا Nocticadia خیلی بهم حس کامل تر و پرفکت تری میداد. بیشتر خوندم بیشتر حرف می‌زنیم.

❤‍🔥8

9 Aug 2026, 12:55 UTC238 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

What if I told you that you're my entire reason for being? That you're why I wake up in the morning. Every goddamn day from the dawn of time until now. What if I told you that you belong to me in a way no woman ever belonged to a man? That I might be evil personified, but you're the only one I'll ever be good to. When the villain gets the girl, it feels like this:) Fairydale 🕯

❤‍🔥9

8 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC342 views24 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Amon D' Artan ♱ ❄️ 𓈒࣪ ᭡ ˖   Fairydale

❤‍🔥24

8 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC329 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026

حالا شاید بخواید بدونید این آقایی که لیترلی داره خودشو برای خانومی تیکه پاره می‌کنه چه شکلیه. اجازه بدید.

🍓8❤‍🔥2

8 Aug 2026, 20:30 UTC330 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026

"You are correct, I am after something else." "And what is that?" "Your soul. Your very essence and everything that makes you, you. Will you give me that? Lizzie mine? Will you surrender everything that you are to me?" "Will you deserve it?" "No one will ever deserve it, Lizzie. No one. But I would devote an eternity to earn the right to call it mine." Fairydale

❤‍🔥12

8 Aug 2026, 18:35 UTC287 views18 reactionsread 9 August 2026

She was like: I don't know anything about flirting, or being charming or witty! I don't know what to say... And then he said :) : You don't have to say anything witty to have my full attention, Lizzie mine. You only have to exist and you're all I see. Fairydale 🕯♱

❤‍🔥18

8 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC291 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

"You made me no promises" "The blood I spilled for you was promise enough, the blood I would spill again, and again. Just to keep you safe. Happy. Mine." Fairydale

🍓7❤‍🔥1

8 Aug 2026, 17:49 UTC281 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

I know what you need. You need a bad man, not a gentleman, you need corruption and sin, Darcy darlin'. You need someone to worship your innocence and despoil it at the same time. Fairydale

❤‍🔥10🍓2

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Circuswonder. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝑆𝑖𝑙𝑣𝑒𝑟'𝑠 𝑚𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑙𝑖𝑏𝑟𝑎𝑟𝑦 🎠” (@Circuswonder), 1,081 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Circuswonder.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.