Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Смарт Pro

Channel

Смарт Pro

@CmartPro

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

823subscribers

+43 since we began measuring on 1 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001668432560
TypeChannel
Username@CmartPro
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded1 September 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/CmartPro

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

780823801.51 September 2026 — 780 subscribers1 September 2026 — 780 subscribers9 September 2026 — 801 subscribers19 September 2026 — 823 subscribers1 September 202619 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 18 days, net +43. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 774–829 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 08:58823+22
9 Sept 2026, 23:00801+21
1 Sept 2026, 07:14780no change
1 Sept 2026, 06:15780first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.6%
avg views ÷ 823 subscribers
Avg views / post
211
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held16 (15 July 202629 August 2026)
Views total422
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 06:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

17 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥635.3%
529.4%
💔317.6%
🤗211.8%
😁15.88%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 22:08 UTC164 views1 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

ЭКСПРЕСС НОВОСТИ APPLE! • Появилось первое фото коробки iPhone 18 Pro (скорее всего Max) с изображением камеры с переменной диафрагмой. К ценнику прикрутят $100. • Складка в первом складном iPhone Ultra будет как в Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra. Первые тестировщики отметили качественный корпус и шарнир, Touch ID вместо привычного Face ID, интерфейс как у iPad. Из минусов — отсутствие телевика и цена свыше $2000. • AirPods

1

Signed Jony

27 Aug 2026, 08:58 UTC258 views4 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

iPhone Air Air 256GB • Sky Blue — 83.800 🇯🇵 eSIM • Light Gold — 83.700 🇯🇵 eSIM • Cloud White — 85.800 🇯🇵 eSIM • Space Black — 84.700 🇯🇵 eSIM Air 512GB • Sky Blue — 87.400 eSIM • Light Gold — 88.400 eSIM • Cloud White — 94.400 eSIM • Space Black — 92.200 eSIM Air 1TB • Sky Blue — 94.400 eSIM • Light Gold — 94.700 eSIM • Cloud White — 100.800 eSIM • Space Black — 96.400 eSIM iPhone 17 17 256GB • Mist Blue — 81

🔥4

Signed Jony

11 Aug 2026, 10:09 UTC378 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

iPad Pro 12,9 дюйма: 3-го, 4-го, 5-го и 6-го поколений iPad Pro 11 дюймов: 1-го, 2-го, 3-го и 4-го поколений iPad Air: 4-го и 5-го поколений iPad mini: 6-го поколения 10.000р

Signed Jony

2 Aug 2026, 04:07 UTC474 views3 reactionsread 1 September 2026

📍 2 августа — не рабочий день 🚨

💔3

Signed Jony

31 Jul 2026, 08:40 UTC474 views2 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Xiaomi 17 Ultra 16/512GB Black 102 300 ₽ Xiaomi 17 Ultra 16/512GB Green 103 300 ₽ Xiaomi 17 Ultra 5G 16/512GB Black 102 200 ₽ Xiaomi 17 Ultra 5G 16/512GB White 102 200 ₽ Xiaomi 17 Ultra 5G 16/512GB Green 103 700 ₽ Если долго думать - может доллар вверх «пойти» Смарт Про🤩 По всем вопросам: 📨@jony0116 📨@psadn2016

🔥2

Signed Jony

26 Jul 2026, 06:35 UTC447 views2 reactionsread 1 September 2026

🤩26 июля — не рабочий день 🚨

2

Signed Jony

21 Jul 2026, 08:46 UTC543 views1 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Если долго думать - можно передумать Смарт Про🤩 По всем вопросам: 📨@jony0116 📨@psadn2016

😁1

Signed Jony

21 Jul 2026, 08:45 UTC546 viewsread 1 September 2026

iPhone 17 Pro 256GB (eSIM) Deep Blue — 101.600 Cosmic Orange — 99.800 Silver — 102.600 256GB (SIM + eSIM) Deep Blue — 106.700 Cosmic Orange — 106.500 Silver — 107.400 512GB (eSIM) Deep Blue — 118.700 Cosmic Orange — 118.400 Silver — 117.800 512GB (SIM + eSIM) Deep Blue — 125.900 Cosmic Orange — 123.800 Silver — 127.900

Signed Jony

21 Jul 2026, 08:45 UTC445 viewsread 1 September 2026

Galaxy S26 Ultra S26 Ultra 12/256GB White — 84.300 S26 Ultra 12/256GB Sky Blue — 81.700 S26 Ultra 12/256GB Black — 82.100 S26 Ultra 12/256GB Violet — 82.100 S26 Ultra 12/512GB White — 98.900 S26 Ultra 12/512GB Sky Blue — 97.600 S26 Ultra 12/512GB Black — 97.600 S26 Ultra 12/512GB Pink Gold — 98.800 S26 Ultra 12/512GB Violet — 97.600 S26 Ultra 16/1TB White — 115.300 S26 Ultra 16/1TB Black — 115.800

Signed Jony

21 Jul 2026, 08:44 UTC429 viewsread 1 September 2026

Galaxy S26 S26 12/256GB Sky Blue — 63.100 S26 12/256GB Black — 62.800 S26 12/256GB Violet — 63.100 S26 12/512GB White — 74.800 S26 12/512GB Sky Blue — 74.200 S26 12/512GB Black — 74.200 S26 12/512GB Violet — 74.200

Signed Jony

21 Jul 2026, 08:44 UTC417 views4 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Всем привет на связи Смарт Про!🤩 По всем вопросам: 📨@jony0116 📨@psadn2016

2🤗2

Signed Jony

18 Jul 2026, 18:38 UTC386 viewsread 1 September 2026

🚨 19 июля — не рабочий день 🤩

Signed Jony

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @CmartPro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Смарт Pro” (@CmartPro), 823 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CmartPro.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.