Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Котеки, репости і репости котеків

Channel

Котеки, репости і репости котеків

@CnBscrapyard

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,815subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001218461707
TypeChannel
Username@CnBscrapyard
Created12 December 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/CnBscrapyard

Growth

1,8151,8271,8216 August 2026 — 1,826 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,826 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,827 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,826 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,825 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,826 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,824 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,822 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,821 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,818 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,819 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,821 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,815 subscribers6 August 202615 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 40 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,813–1,829 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 07:011,815-6
11 Sept 2026, 09:371,821+2
6 Sept 2026, 16:411,819+1
1 Sept 2026, 20:331,818-3
24 Aug 2026, 12:421,821-1
21 Aug 2026, 05:331,822-2
18 Aug 2026, 09:551,824-2
15 Aug 2026, 02:281,826+1
12 Aug 2026, 03:071,825-1
9 Aug 2026, 01:401,826-1
6 Aug 2026, 10:101,827+1
6 Aug 2026, 06:491,826no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:351,826first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 28 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:23 UTC93 viewsread 7 August 2026

фольксваген натурально гітлер

Signed Макс

7 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC105 viewsread 7 August 2026

Правда ще не закінчена, бо кур'єр такий інтиресний був, машиною під хату під'їхав, я коробку в неї поставив, а там ще дві таких же коробки стоїть наліпку не наліпив, просто двері закрив, сказав шось типу "ну я адресу знаю" [тобто посилка вже створена з визначеним відділенням куди їхати і від мене нічого більше не треба] Думав посилка раніше за мене до куїйва доїде, але нп хворіє, тому приходьте завтра Досі трошки жи

Signed Макс

7 Aug 2026, 07:58 UTC180 viewsread 7 August 2026

Йобаний сука блаблакар, була опція басфором поїхати на гітлерваген крафтер, подумав що опція їхати бусом де не факт шо є вікна мені не надто подобається Бачу оголошення з не вказаною машиною "максимум 2 людей на задньому сидінні" @ Приїхав спринтер

Signed Макс

6 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC194 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

СЬОМА АЛЬТМАН ХВОРИЙ ХЛОПЕЦЬ МАЄ В ДУПІ ЖАБУ ЖАБА МАЄ СЕМА В ДУПУ ДУМАЄ Some 19th-century experiments, especially Fratscher's experiments in 1875, suggested that the underlying premise [that if a frog is put suddenly into boiling water, it will jump out, but if the frog is put in tepid water which is then brought to a boil slowly, it will not perceive the danger and will be cooked to death] is true if the heating is

Signed Макс

6 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC207 viewsread 7 August 2026

В сухості трави звинувачую особисто плакат "святкуємо 125 років з дня заснування" нариганий кланкером

Signed Макс

6 Aug 2026, 11:13 UTC203 viewsread 7 August 2026

Смт опше якась срака яка зібрала мінуси міста™(деякого, не скажу якого), але забула позбирати плюси, тому кругом суха трава, дерев десь в 4 рази менше ніж варто було б і воня машинами, але до пошти треба пиздувати 20 хвилин замість 3 Колись бачив навіть один рагульний магазин шо газон постелив на ділянці (десь приблизно 8м²)

Signed Макс

6 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC211 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Відправляю посилку собі

Signed Макс

5 Aug 2026, 16:11 UTC246 viewsread 7 August 2026

Взагалі в Києві плюс триста відчуваються як середній день +37 в селі і вже трохи сильніше ніж зазвичай хочеться кожну шібізяну трамбувати в мідного бика

Signed Макс

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @CnBscrapyard. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Антигуманістичне гатіння
@jokes_over_200 · 27,156
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 11 September 2026
Дріт
@hrinovyny · 28,894
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Котеки, репости і репости котеків” (@CnBscrapyard), 1,815 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CnBscrapyard.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.