19 measurements spanning 19 days, net -898. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35,443–36,611 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Aug 2026, 19:28
35,578
-76
29 Aug 2026, 21:16
35,654
-65
29 Aug 2026, 00:04
35,719
-33
28 Aug 2026, 03:12
35,752
-15
27 Aug 2026, 00:27
35,767
-24
26 Aug 2026, 01:13
35,791
-26
24 Aug 2026, 21:55
35,817
-46
23 Aug 2026, 05:43
35,863
-48
21 Aug 2026, 19:04
35,911
-35
20 Aug 2026, 17:14
35,946
-34
19 Aug 2026, 16:36
35,980
-15
18 Aug 2026, 15:53
35,995
-77
17 Aug 2026, 13:38
36,072
-164
16 Aug 2026, 03:55
36,236
-132
14 Aug 2026, 14:37
36,368
-48
13 Aug 2026, 03:26
36,416
-29
12 Aug 2026, 03:25
36,445
-31
11 Aug 2026, 19:00
36,476
no change
11 Aug 2026, 18:48
36,476
first reading
Engagement
78 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
32.1%
avg views ÷ 35,578 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,400
67 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
67
of 78 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026
Posts held
78 (24 July 2026 – 30 August 2026)
Views total
764,730
Reactions total
34,788
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
30 Aug 2026, 20:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
845
Videos
76
Links
948
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
12s
Average length
12s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
40,170 reactions across 78 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🗿
20,404
50.8%
✍
19,766
49.2%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 78 of the 78 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40,170reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 78 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
135
across the posts below
Posts paid on
21
of 78 we hold a reading for · 27%
Most on one post
72
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @CoIdGamble. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 78 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 30 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Been calling a lot of these privately lately and the results have been crazy.
I’m not posting everything publicly yet because most of them are still not open to everyone, but I’ve been watching them early, tracking the moves and getting in position before the crowd even sees them.
Once this opens up properly and everyone can access it, I’ll drop the link here for you guys.
I’m not trying to rush it or force anythi…
Basecat crime to 100m for sure
bro. only 400k of buys to send basecat to 50m
lol when coinbase turns the crime on it so over lol
Sitting at 22m still lots of criming to be made
https://x.com/cryptocom/status/2093254697935048842
cheapest coin ever to get listed on crypto.com and coinbase btw
hearing alot more coming.
Binance next
The founder of metawin is giving away $100k on Saturday to 500 people!
That's $200 per person...
make sure you have an account created on metawin.com and follow the instructions in the post
one of the easiest giveaways to enter, i wouldn't fade this
https://x.com/skel/status/2092283690923556949?s=20
with $CASHCAT at ATH
I have a feeling $BASECAT will follow
cashcat: Cat of Robinhood, listed on Robinhood basecat: Cat of Coinbase, listed on Coinbase
$basecat will 100% follow
Coinbase is 9x bigger onchain
basecat might be one of the lowest coins listed on Coinbase but also the newest
BRETT isn’t even on coinbase btw
ngl basecat is the easiest sizer play on the market right now
BY FAR lol
good for a 5x atleas…
TIP OF THE DAY
Bear market might be in its final stages. Maybe it’s already over.
Either way, there’s one skill you should be working on right now that will separate you from 90% of the people who flood back into crypto when the real action starts again.
PROFIT TAKING.
Catching a good coin isn’t the hard part.
Most people can catch a 3x eventually. Some catch 10x. Some even catch the occasional monster runner.
…
Happy to announce i've partnered with MetaWin!
There's a special offer running right now just for you guys
If you deposit on metawin.com and use code ‘X100’ they double your first deposit up to $1000
On top of that… They just announced $1M is going out to players this month and every month after that
So if you’ve never used MetaWin you can deposit right now & guarantee yourself a free $1,000 + your share of the $…
Showing the 12 most recent of 78 posts we hold for @CoIdGamble. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“COLD CONVICTIONS” (@CoIdGamble), 35,578 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CoIdGamble.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.