Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for COERSTAR. (DISBAND)

Channel

COERSTAR. (DISBAND)

@Coerstar

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003259135621
TypeChannel
Username@Coerstar
Description𝘛𝘦𝘦𝘯𝘢𝘨𝘦 𝘧𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 : 📞: @Coerstarbot! @Coerstars حياة أحلام المراهق☎️They've come to stake their claim, proving that in this new frontier!🇺🇸
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 17 December 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded15 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Coerstar

Growth

112 August 2026 — 1 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1 subscribers12 August 202615 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 08:011no change
12 Aug 2026, 22:581first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 17 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
10
Videos
3
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

87 reactions across 3 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 51886330684029609603641.4%
custom 62961645726466081711314.9%
custom 534808845802591912889.20%
custom 614784815493599014266.90%
custom 493421336200007010955.75%
custom 493633523046311667555.75%
custom 526035142444898476555.75%
custom 614565430282106297755.75%
custom 544050816989164089744.60%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 87 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 17 December 2025 to 25 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 13 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Coerstar. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 December 2025 to 25 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

25 Dec 2025, 15:19 UTC353 views21 reactionsread 15 August 2026

See you coerstar. ❤️

custom 518863306840296096021

25 Dec 2025, 15:18 UTCviews —

COERSTAR. (DISBAND) pinned «Announcement: Hello everyone, good evening. We have some very bad news tonight. The account owner who handled everything about Coerstar has suddenly been deactivated without any news at all. We ourselves were confused because it happened suddenly and there…»

25 Dec 2025, 15:18 UTC388 views22 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Announcement: Hello everyone, good evening. We have some very bad news tonight. The account owner who handled everything about Coerstar has suddenly been deactivated without any news at all. We ourselves were confused because it happened suddenly and there was no news at all from our owner, so all of us coerstar members have discussed this matter. We have decided to disband Coerstar today, there is no way for us to i

custom 518863306840296096013custom 62961645726466081715custom 54405081698916408974

22 Dec 2025, 13:55 UTC314 viewsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @HooniverseaPhoto

To the one who lights up hearts, @Coerstar As the world glows with twinkling lights and the air fills with quiet magic, I wantes to send a little not your way “Sleigh Bells Rings, Are You Listening?” gentle joy drifts through the crisp winter air, calm reflections settle in cozy corners and warmth wraps around moments that feel timeless. May your days be filled with small wonders, steady peace and quiet happiness t

20 Dec 2025, 13:59 UTC224 viewsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @XIDETlNSPhoto

With the arrival of this winter’s first snow, the elfs have delivered a letter for the ones you cherished: May I pin down a golden-lined letter by the doves of winter for our friendship, @coerstar. ⭐️🎅🏻 I’ll make sure to save a plate of friendship by the crooks of my life, I’ve been wanting to thank you for being such a light ‘till this season came—Let us savior our friendship until the last drops of snow comes aroun

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @Coerstar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,615,606 of 1,629,403 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“COERSTAR. (DISBAND)” (@Coerstar), 1 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Coerstar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.