Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CoinEx_Announcement

Channel

CoinEx_Announcement

@CoinEx_Announcement

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

20,234subscribers

-588 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001798997555
TypeChannel
Username@CoinEx_Announcement
DescriptionStay tuned for CoinEx official updates and news! Discussion: https://t.me/CoinExOfficialEN Website: https://www.coinex.com/?lang=en_US
CreatedBetween 1 January 2022 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CoinEx_Announcement

Growth

20,23420,82220,5286 August 2026 — 20,822 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,822 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,811 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,790 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,767 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,746 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,721 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,685 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,657 subscribers13 August 2026 — 20,640 subscribers15 August 2026 — 20,607 subscribers16 August 2026 — 20,562 subscribers17 August 2026 — 20,533 subscribers18 August 2026 — 20,528 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20,488 subscribers20 August 2026 — 20,466 subscribers21 August 2026 — 20,418 subscribers23 August 2026 — 20,384 subscribers24 August 2026 — 20,340 subscribers25 August 2026 — 20,312 subscribers26 August 2026 — 20,297 subscribers27 August 2026 — 20,276 subscribers29 August 2026 — 20,244 subscribers29 August 2026 — 20,234 subscribers6 August 202629 August 2026
24 measurements spanning 24 days, net -588. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,146–20,910 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 21:2720,234-10
29 Aug 2026, 00:3420,244-32
27 Aug 2026, 22:1320,276-21
26 Aug 2026, 20:2720,297-15
25 Aug 2026, 21:4720,312-28
24 Aug 2026, 23:3720,340-44
23 Aug 2026, 09:5320,384-34
21 Aug 2026, 23:2620,418-48
20 Aug 2026, 16:2220,466-22
19 Aug 2026, 16:4520,488-40
18 Aug 2026, 16:1620,528-5
17 Aug 2026, 19:3720,533-29
16 Aug 2026, 15:2720,562-45
15 Aug 2026, 00:1320,607-33
13 Aug 2026, 16:2620,640-17
12 Aug 2026, 15:5420,657-28
11 Aug 2026, 12:2720,685-36
10 Aug 2026, 13:4120,721-25
9 Aug 2026, 13:1220,746-21
8 Aug 2026, 10:2820,767first reading

Engagement

81 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.05%
avg views ÷ 20,234 subscribers
Avg views / post
414
72 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.866%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
72
of 81 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 41 of 72 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held81 (28 July 202629 August 2026)
Views total29,819
Reactions total147
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 22:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
5,860
Videos
379
Links
5,400

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
8m 22s
Average length
2m 06s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

160 reactions across 43 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8251.2%
🔥3823.8%
👍2817.5%
🤯42.50%
👏31.88%
😁31.88%
😎21.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 81 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 164reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 81 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC204 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Market Pulse | Aug 29 The Fed Just Changed the Game Jackson Hole is over. Now comes the repricing. 🏦 RATE CUT BETS TAKE A HIT Kevin Warsh’s hawkish tone pushed September rate-hike expectations sharply higher. Markets are now pricing in a very different Fed path. 💵 THE DOLLAR STRIKES BACK A more hawkish Fed means higher-for-longer rates could be back in focus, giving the dollar fresh support. 🥇 GOLD FEELS THE PRE

Signed EcoLoad

28 Aug 2026, 10:27 UTC216 viewsread 29 August 2026
Video

Stay witty, follow Kitty.😼 Crypto in 90 Seconds #03 is here! This week’s crypto highlights: 🪙 BTC briefly topped 81k 📈 US ETFs are following the move⬆️ Catch the key stories shaping the market in 90 seconds with CoinEx Kitty!

Signed EcoLoad

28 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC269 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Market Pulse | Aug 28 The Fed Has the Mic Yesterday, Nvidia gave markets something to cheer about. Today, the spotlight shifts to the Fed. 🏦 JACKSON HOLE TAKES CENTER STAGE Kevin Warsh is set to speak at Jackson Hole, with markets looking for clues on the future path of interest rates. 📈 NVIDIA LIT THE TORCH Nvidia’s strong results reignited the AI trade, but the rally still has to deal with borrowing costs and e

Signed EcoLoad

28 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC296 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

CoinEx Will Delist ALCX, BOSON, DRIFT, FLOCK, KLV, LOFI, OKB, ALPINE, and FOGO

Signed CoinEx Tracker

27 Aug 2026, 08:22 UTC348 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

CoinEx Will Delist ALD, RLS, BLACKDRAGON, U, GORK, ZEUSETH, WHY, PNK, HFUN, and ACN

Signed CoinEx Tracker

27 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC300 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Top 5 Searches on CoinEx 🚀 Find CoinEx: Web | 𝕏 | Telegram | Announcement | Discord | Facebook | Instagram | Medium | Reddit | YouTube

1

Signed Hari

27 Aug 2026, 06:29 UTC227 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Market Pulse | Aug 27 Nvidia Delivered. The Fed Is Next. Yesterday’s biggest test is over. Now markets have a new set of questions to digest. 🤖 AI PASSED THE TEST Nvidia delivered $96.2B in quarterly revenue, with Data Center revenue up 117% YoY. The AI spending story is still looking strong. 🏦 BUT THE FED HAS THE MIC Inflation remains above the Fed’s 2% target, keeping rate expectations in focus. Now, all eyes t

🔥3

Signed EcoLoad

27 Aug 2026, 03:13 UTC326 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🪙 BTC Breaks $75K: Real Breakout or Overreaction? Missed our latest AMA? Catch up on the key insights from our discussion on BTC’s move above $75K, market liquidity, BTC dominance, and what could come next. 🎙️ Read the full AMA recap 👇 AMA Recap⁠↗ 📢 Watch the highlights on X: CoinEx AMA Post↗

2

Signed Hari

26 Aug 2026, 10:40 UTC321 views4 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🔒 Your Assets Are Secure with CoinEx! We’ve updated our Proof of Reserve data as of Aug 25, to maintain full transparency and ensure the security of your funds. 📌 Learn more here: Proof of Reserve Landing Page Stay confident with CoinEx!

👍4

Signed EcoLoad

26 Aug 2026, 09:13 UTC232 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

CoinEx Has Updated the Proof of Reserve Data on Aug 25, 2026

Signed CoinEx Tracker

26 Aug 2026, 08:36 UTC300 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Market Pulse | Aug 26 🌍 The Calm Before the Move The market looks relatively calm. But underneath, several big catalysts are lining up. 🤖 Nvidia Earnings The AI giant reports today. The real question isn’t just whether it beats estimates, but whether AI spending can keep supporting the broader tech rally. 🏦 Fed & Inflation U.S. inflation data and Jackson Hole are coming into focus. One signal could quickly change

👍3

Signed EcoLoad

Showing the 12 most recent of 81 posts we hold for @CoinEx_Announcement. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 42,629 of 1,626,884entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 29 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

BingX Announcement
@BingXAnnouncement · 171,085
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
Dex-Trade Channel
@Dex_Trade · 69,776
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 August 2026
BitMart Exchange Channel
@BitMartExchange_Channel · 61,754
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026
Gate News
@GateOfficialNews · 492,129
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CoinEx_Announcement” (@CoinEx_Announcement), 20,234 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CoinEx_Announcement.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.