Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CoinTribune - Crypto News

Channel

CoinTribune - Crypto News

@Cointribune

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,955subscribers

-44 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001573901374
TypeChannel
Username@Cointribune
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Cointribune

Growth

6,9426,9996,970.57 August 2026 — 6,999 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,992 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,963 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,970 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,958 subscribers21 August 2026 — 6,960 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,942 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,951 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,944 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,955 subscribers6,9557 August 20264 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 28 days, net -44. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,933–7,008 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 04:416,955+11
31 Aug 2026, 10:346,944-7
28 Aug 2026, 02:056,951+9
25 Aug 2026, 00:466,942-18
21 Aug 2026, 02:236,960+2
17 Aug 2026, 19:036,958-12
14 Aug 2026, 09:376,970+7
10 Aug 2026, 21:586,963-29
7 Aug 2026, 13:456,992-7
7 Aug 2026, 09:026,999first reading

Engagement

112 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.80%
avg views ÷ 6,955 subscribers
Avg views / post
125
99 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
99
of 112 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 99 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held112 (5 August 202619 August 2026)
Views total12,398
Reactions total298
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 03:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

298 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍20067.1%
9130.5%
❤‍🔥41.34%
👌31.01%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 112 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 298 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 112 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 21:30 UTC48 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Investing in Gold in 2026: All the Ways to Expose Yourself to the Yellow Metal Gold had its best year since 1979 in 2025, with dozens of successive records. Early 2026, it surpassed 5,500 dollars per ounce before falling sharply in spring. This wide fluctuation sums up the question investors ask themselves: should you still buy gold now, and especially how? Between physical bullion, ETFs, mining stocks, and tokenize

19 Aug 2026, 20:30 UTC54 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Trump Puts Canada Trade War on Hold for 72 Hours Donald Trump gives Canada a three-day reprieve. The 50% tariffs that were supposed to take effect on August 19 are suspended while Washington and Ottawa finalize a trade agreement. Trump says the essential points are settled. Mark Carney talks rather about significant progress with still work to do. For markets, including crypto, a new deadline has simply replaced the

19 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC56 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

VanEck Flags 8 of 12 Capitulation Signals For Bitcoin While bitcoin struggles to find a clear direction, VanEck attempts to date the end of the correction. The asset manager relies on on-chain data and market structure to measure the extent of the purge, especially among long-term holders. Its analysis mainly outlines a scenario for what follows. An accumulation phase whose duration could provide valuable clues abou

19 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC100 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Bitcoin ETFs Draw $189M as August Inflows Near $1B US spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded 189.3 million dollars of inflows on Tuesday, August 18, 2026. After 297.6 million the day before, the cumulative monthly total now approaches one billion dollars according to SoSoValue. A notable rebound, although a large portion of the capital continues to flow towards BlackRock's IBIT.

❤‍🔥3

19 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC130 views1 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

TikTok Messaging Could Soon Allow Money Transfers TikTok is exploring a new financial feature that could change the usage of its messaging. According to Bloomberg, code discovered in the current version of the iPhone app in the United States reveals a system for peer-to-peer money transfers. The system would allow sending and receiving payments through direct messages. For now, the platform is not testing this featu

1

19 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC284 views1 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

France Taps Mistral AI To Find Flaws In Government Systems The hacking of the Directorate General of Public Finances pushes the French State to review its cybersecurity strategy. Faced with vulnerabilities affecting administrations and exposing sensitive data, the executive wants to deeply strengthen its digital audits. A response worthy of a threat that now goes beyond public systems alone. The stolen information c

1

19 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC307 views69 reactionsread 20 August 2026

New Free #TON #Giveaway 👇 0.01000000 TON for 500 winners Sponsored by @Cointribune #toncoin #airdrop

👍5217

19 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTC294 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Kraken Opens More Than 7,000 US Stocks to European Investors Access to the US markets is expanding for investors in the European Economic Area. On August 18, Kraken announced the opening of more than 7,000 US-listed stocks to its eligible clients. The offer also includes more than 700 stocks and more than 600 crypto-assets in a single regulated account. This development is part of its MiFID approval. It brings toget

19 Aug 2026, 09:30 UTC243 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Crypto: The CLARITY Act Faces Renewed Turmoil, but Patrick Witt Remains Confident The Clarity Act is still not dead. Patrick Witt, the White House crypto advisor, even says he is "optimistic" ahead of the next vote scheduled in the Senate on September 15. The text exceeds 600 pages and aims to give the United States a federal framework for the crypto market. However, an old issue complicates the discussions again: t

19 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC229 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Bitcoin Faces A Key $65,000 Test After A Sharp Price Surge Bitcoin abruptly jumped this Tuesday, August 18, to the $65,000 mark. This movement caught short sellers off guard, heavily exposed in derivative markets. The rise now faces a concentration of sell orders likely to slow down BTC. Meanwhile, on-chain data shows long-term accumulation, notably on the side of institutional players. Two opposing dynamics could i

19 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTC198 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

AI: ECB Economists Warn Tech Stocks May Be Due for a Pullback The ECB warns of a stock market correction related to AI. A focus on the €440 billion of European exposure and the risks for the crypto market.

18 Aug 2026, 21:30 UTC178 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

The bond market might be Bitcoin's biggest threat right now Bitcoin faces an unprecedented shock as US yields top 5.3%, threatening the entire crypto market balance.

Showing the 12 most recent of 112 posts we hold for @Cointribune. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Binance Giveaways
@FreeBinanceBoxes · 37,904
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 31 August 2026
Emprende con Raul 💰🚀👌
@exitox · 32,877
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CoinTribune - Crypto News” (@Cointribune), 6,955 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Cointribune.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.