آپدیت ترین چنلا اکسو رو چک کردی ؟ همشون یه جا باهم اینجان 🥂

Channel
𝐂𝗈𝗅𝖽 𝚮𝖾𝖺𝗋𝗍 ִֶָ࣪
@Cold_heart_6104
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
434subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002611661141 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Cold_heart_6104 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Cold_heart_6104 |
Topic
Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 04:39 | 434 | +5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:25 | 429 | +2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:04 | 427 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:55 | 428 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:41 | 434 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 435 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 03s
- Average length
- 1m 03s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
391 reactions across 13 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😭 | 208 | 53.2% | |
| 🍓 | 163 | 41.7% | |
| 🤣 | 20 | 5.12% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 391 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
♡ چانیول واقعا رفته دیت!! 𖹭 جدیدترین آهنگای اکسو ♡ زیرخاکی اکسو یا هوش مصنوعی؟ 𖹭 بکهیون گفته از چانیول متنفره؟! ♡ بکهیون، کایرو خلعسلاح میکنه؟ 𖹭 استیکر درخواستی از چانبک اکسو؟ ♡ فیکشن ممنوعه و اسمات بامبی 𖹭 فوتو اكسو كارت ♡ همکاری مرسدس بنز با چانیول؟ 𖹭 بکهیون توسط مونگ تهدید به قتل شد ؟
Sticker, posted without a caption
افراد زیادی به خاطر زیبایی این شخص تحت تاثیر قرار گرفته بودن. مثل اقای پارک که دهنش باز مونده بود و به زیبایی بکهیون خیره شده بود و معنی لب خونی چانیون این بوده: 🍒: "예쁘다!" (یه-پیو-دا! - چقدر زیبا!)
🍓19😭8
نمیدونید چقدر حالم خوب شد وقتی دیدم پیام داده قربونت برم اخه با خانوادش رفته سفر و مونگریونگی هم پیششه😭
😭30
ʙᴀᴇᴋʜʏᴜɴ ʙᴜʙʙʟᴇ 💌 ㅤ┈─ᰰ 260807 🐶 : شاید بهتره یه کم دراز بکشم و استراحت کنم~~~ (عکس میفرسته) 🐶 : که نمیخوابم.. 🐶 : فقط یه لحظه چراغو خاموش کردم ببینم چطوری میشه.. 🐶 : وایبش... چطوره...؟ #큥이버블 #BUBBLE @백현update
😭21🍓2
انقدر عصابم خورده که دست و دلم اصلا نمیره پست بزارم شاید فردا پسفردا ولی فعلا ازم انتظار نداشته باشید
🍓17
حق گفت
به اینایی که لفت میدن مشکوکم نکنه هیتری؟!🤨
🤣20
فراموش نکنین برین براش یه عالمه کامنت مثبت و خوب بزارید تو هرجایی که میتونید بکهیونی ما خیلی دقت میکنه پس مطمئن باشید پیاماتون رو میخونه انقدر زیاد پیام بدین که اجازه ندید هیت ها به چشمش بیان
🍓38
یه چیزی رو خوب تو ۱۳ سال اکسوالیم فهمیدم اکسوالا خلاف ارمیا اونا تو استن کردن و حمایت کردن از ایدل استعداد دارن ولی اکسوالا تو ان استن و کنسل کردن ایدل استعداد غیر مادرزادی دارن متاسفانه 💔
😭34
Signed 𝜷𝑎𝑚𝑏𝒊 مارتین ایموجی
تویی که حتی به یکی از اعضای اکسو هیت میدی چطور روت میشه به خودت بگی اکسوال؟ چطوری خجالت نمیکشی بگی من فن فلانی ام ولی به کسی که باهاش هم گروهه هیت میدم، مسخره میکنم و ازش بدم میاد؟ فرقی نمیکنه چنبکشی باشه یا کریس و تائو و لوهان که خیلی وقته اکسو رو ترک کردن. حالا چنبکشی ترک هم نکردن فقط اسام حرومی بودنش رو بیشتر نشونمون داده چقدر شماها وقیحین؟ تا کی قراره ادامه بدین؟ چرا نسلتون منقرض نمیشه؟ چرا انقدر شیطان صفتین؟ اگ…
😭41
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Cold_heart_6104. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@updateBaekhyun · 1492 posts𝒞herry X
@cherryxarchive · 2071 post 𝖯𝗂𝖺𝖴𝗍𝗈 61:04
@coldbord · 3511 postKᴀιʙᴀᴇκ нoмᴇ ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ☕️
@kaibaekhome · 3621 post↬Kyungժօო ༉
@Kyungdomi · 1,4331 post〰️▫️ₑₓₒ Bₗ fᵢcₜᵢₒₙ▫️〰
@loneliness_of_words · 9011 post•𝘓𝘜𝘔𝘖 𝘚𝘏𝘖𝘗•
@lumosh0p · 3011 post𝐃𝐀𝐑𝐊 𝐊𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐓𝐎𝐖𝐍
@REALDARKKINGTOWN · 2431 postㅤ𝐒ҽ𝐂ԋαɳ𝐁αҽƙ
@SCBtherapy · 9431 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Cold_heart_6104 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026 · confirmed gone 10 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ 𝐂𝗈𝗅𝖽 𝚮𝖾𝖺𝗋𝗍 ִֶָ࣪” (@Cold_heart_6104), 434 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Cold_heart_6104.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.