Channel
@CommodityPrices
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,361subscribers
-19 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001825732431 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CommodityPrices |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CommodityPrices |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Oct 2026, 15:21 | 3,361 | -7 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 06:19 | 3,368 | -4 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:16 | 3,372 | -3 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 08:00 | 3,375 | +2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 11:22 | 3,373 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:57 | 3,375 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:59 | 3,374 | -6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:23 | 3,380 | -3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 10:56 | 3,383 | -6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:56 | 3,389 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:34 | 3,388 | +3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 3,385 | +4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:21 | 3,381 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 3,380 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:59 | 3,380 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
43 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 21 | 48.8% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 32.6% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 9.30% | |
| 🌚 | 3 | 6.98% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 2.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 43 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
China coal power rose for a sixth consecutive month in June as weaker wind generation and continued renewable curtailment created additional space for coal-fired electricity. The latest monthly snapshot highlights how weather conditions, grid constraints and expanding thermal capacity continue to influence the world’s largest power market despite the rapid deployment of renewable energy. China’s coal power generatio…
Kazakh coal transit through Russian ports rises 34% in H1 2026 Kazakh coal transit through Russian ports increased sharply during the first half of 2026, supported by rail agreements and sanctions exemptions. Transshipment of Kazakh coal through Russian Baltic and Southern ports in January-June 2026 increased to 6.7 mio t (+1.7 mio t or +34.0% y-o-y). The growth stems from agreements reached between Russian Railwa…
❤3🌚1
Russian coal exports to Turkey fall 26.9% in January–May 2026 Russian coal exports to Turkey declined sharply in the first five months of 2026 as unprofitable shipments and rising logistics costs weakened Russia’s position in the market. In January-May 2026 Russian coal exports to Turkey dropped to 9.5 mio t (-3.5 mio t or -26.9% y-o-y). Meanwhile, in Jan-May 2026, Turkey’s total coal imports, including thermal co…
Global coal prices diverged over the past week as geopolitical tensions, extreme weather and regional demand conditions shaped regional markets. Coal market quotations moved in different directions over the past week: indices in Europe strengthened; coal in China edged lower; in Australia, thermal coal prices rose, while metallurgical material continued its downward trend. In the European market, thermal coal indic…
👍2❤1
The Russian coal industry remains under severe financial pressure despite tax deferrals and other state support measures. Russian coal companies will return 0.7 billion USD to the federal budget by the end of 2026, funds that were provided to them as deferrals on mineral extraction tax (MET) and insurance premiums, according to Energy Ministry. Some 138 companies were eligible for deferrals totalling 1 billion USD,…
👍1
Russian rail coal exports to China plunge 29.5% in January–June 2026 Russian coal exports to China through railway border crossings fell sharply during the first half of 2026 amid weak demand and transport constraints. In January-June 2026, Russian railway coal exports to China via border crossings dropped to 5.8 mio t (-2.4 mio t or -29.5% vs. Jan-Jun 2025). The main reasons for the decline in exports to China vi…
Russian coal exports are gaining support from South Korean demand as the country increases coal and nuclear power generation. In January–May 2026, South Korea doubled its coal imports from Russia to 10.2 mio t (+5.0 mio t or +96.2% vs. Jan–May 2025). South Korea’s total coal imports in January–May 2026 surged to 46.8 mio t (+7.6 mio t or +19.4% vs. Jan–May 2025). Because of the energy crisis in the Middle East, So…
❤3🔥1
PJM electricity generation during the first major U.S. heat wave of summer 2026 relied overwhelmingly on dispatchable power sources, with coal and natural gas providing the additional generation needed as electricity demand surged to near-record levels. The first major heat wave of the 2026 U.S. summer pushed electricity demand across the PJM Interconnection close to record levels, providing another real-world test …
Global coal prices showed mixed dynamics over the past week, with European indices continuing to recover, Chinese coal prices softening, Indonesian coal facing weak demand, and Australian thermal coal moving lower. Mixed dynamics persisted in the coal market over the past week: indices in Europe edged higher; coal in China became cheaper; in Australia, thermal material prices fell, while metallurgical coal quotation…
In its latest metallurgical coal market update, McCloskey highlighted how developments in China drove sharp swings in both futures and physical markets, prompting renewed interest in seaborne supply and supporting higher prices for premium hard coking coal. McCloskey reported that its assessment for low-volatile coal MCC1 rose by $3.60/t on the week to $243.00/t FOB Australia, while MCC4 increased by $18.15/t to $26…
Kuzbass coal production declined in January-May 2026 amid rising losses and logistics pressure. Under the Ministry of Coal Industry of Kuzbass, in January-May 2026, coal mining enterprises in Kuzbass produced 77.7 mio t (-4.1 mio t or -5.0% vs. Jan-May 2025). Export supplies from Kuzbass in January-May 2026 totaled 45.5 mio t (+1.9 mio t or +4.4% vs. Jan-May 2025). The fall in global prices, coupled with a rise in…
❤2🔥1
Global coal prices declined over the past week amid weaker sentiment across major coal markets. Negative sentiment prevailed in the coal market over the past week: indices in Europe declined significantly; coal in China remained unchanged; in Australia, high-CV thermal and metallurgical coal became cheaper. In the European coal market, the downward movement intensified over the past week. Quotations fell below 118 …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CommodityPrices. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Commodity: Urea, Coal, En 590, Pellets” (@CommodityPrices), 3,361 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CommodityPrices.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.