Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 貝殼街120號

Channel

貝殼街120號

@Conchstreet120

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,228subscribers

-23 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001578230796
TypeChannel
Username@Conchstreet120
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Conchstreet120

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,2243,2513,237.57 August 2026 — 3,251 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,251 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,248 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,247 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,249 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,247 subscribers23 August 2026 — 3,245 subscribers25 August 2026 — 3,242 subscribers28 August 2026 — 3,236 subscribers1 September 2026 — 3,233 subscribers4 September 2026 — 3,226 subscribers9 September 2026 — 3,224 subscribers13 September 2026 — 3,225 subscribers17 September 2026 — 3,228 subscribers3,2287 August 202617 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net -23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,220–3,255 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 19:363,228+3
13 Sept 2026, 21:183,225+1
9 Sept 2026, 18:203,224-2
4 Sept 2026, 09:403,226-7
1 Sept 2026, 08:273,233-3
28 Aug 2026, 21:533,236-6
25 Aug 2026, 18:473,242-3
23 Aug 2026, 04:023,245-2
19 Aug 2026, 09:263,247-2
16 Aug 2026, 18:353,249+2
13 Aug 2026, 07:453,247-1
10 Aug 2026, 16:333,248-3
7 Aug 2026, 11:463,251no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:323,251first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 5 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

269 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
19271.4%
👍248.92%
😭207.43%
🔥186.69%
🫡72.60%
😁62.23%
10.372%
😘10.372%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 269 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 07:01 UTC≈1,150 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

社群平台好多人在笑他,有的笑他蠢有的笑他爛有的笑他要去打工什麼的。 2.25億美起家,兩年翻到240億美金AUM。 基金槓桿爆倉被margin call了,基金資產還是剩超過100億美金,包含退還給客戶的錢他自己本人高機率保持Billionaire。

51🔥1

Signed Evann

29 Jul 2026, 21:23 UTC977 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

9

Signed Evann

29 Jul 2026, 21:23 UTC≈1,060 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

原先只有AI在跌(NDX跌得遠比SPX深),標普內資金輪動指數有撐對VIX沒多少影響。 FOMC開完標普直接爆炸,目前已跌破CTA短期支撐,若繼續下跌(尤其VIX又在漲),將引發系統性交易基金(尤其是CTA)的拋售。 我們估計系統性交易持有的美國股票多頭部位為1,963.3億美元。 接下來的1週內… 平盤:賣出13.2 億美元(其中美國以外賣出為 52.1 億美元) 上漲行情:買入23.4億美元(其中19.4億美元來自美國) 下跌行情:賣出248.9億美元(其中157.3億美元來自美國) 接下來的1個月… 平盤:買進 165.9 億美元(其中 31.9 億美元來自美國) 上漲行情:買進372.5億美元(其中106.6億美元流入美國) 下跌行情:賣出1722.7億美元(其中683.9億美元來自美國)

25

Signed Evann

29 Jul 2026, 21:22 UTC956 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

從歷史經驗來看,在經歷了一輪擁擠的上漲行情後,動能反轉往往會過度波動,之後才會趨於穩定。 此次回檔的幅度已經接近以往回檔週期中較為嚴重的程度,這表明相當一部分強制拋售可能已經過去。 但是

Signed Evann

13 Jul 2026, 17:42 UTC≈1,530 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🫡7

Signed Evann

13 Jul 2026, 13:07 UTC≈1,450 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😭11

Signed Evann

13 Jul 2026, 13:06 UTC≈3,000 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

終究是韓國散戶盡力保護大家。

18😁6😭1

Signed Evann

7 Jul 2026, 19:35 UTC≈1,780 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

AI complex themes at the bottom of the leaderboard today with semis and memory weakness a clear standout. Our memory basket GSTMTMEM -710 bps, Semis basket GSTMTSEM -585bps, AI Infra beneficiaries GSXUINFR -568bps, Optical GSXUOPTI -542bps, and data centers GSTMTDAT -515bps. Our desk has not seen people stepping in to defend this space today. We have had a clear sell skew early, with combination of HF and LO reducing

171

Signed Evann

23 Jun 2026, 10:55 UTC≈1,960 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

升息看起來更可能,但仍非基準情境 6月 FOMC 把利率維持在 3.5–3.75%,並從聲明中移除先前暗示降息的 forward guidance;聲明也大幅縮短簡化 Rate 維持不變如市場預期,但 SEP 帶來鷹派意外:九位官員預測 2026 升息(GS 原本只預期三位) GS base case 仍是今年政策利率維持不變 Dot plot 出現 9 對 9 平手 新主席 Kevin Warsh 選擇不提交自己的點陣圖預測 結果造成「至少升息一次」與「維持不變/一例降息」陣營在 dot plot 上 9 比 9 平手 經濟預測中的鷹派驚喜 關鍵意外在 2027 Q4/Q4 core PCE 中位數預測上調 0.3pp 至 2.5%(GS 原預期較溫和升到 2.3%) 顯示官員更擔心近期較強的通膨數據——部分源自與 Iran 戰爭的能源成本衝擊——對更長遠通膨的影響 Warsh presser:立場不明但偏鷹 對「當前政

🔥173

Signed Evann

23 Jun 2026, 10:53 UTC≈1,200 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @StockIntelligenceNews

#焦點 霍爾木茲海峽22日商船通行量達2月底以來峯值 專業機構提供的數據顯示,22日至少有36艘商船穿越霍爾木茲海峽,為2月底伊朗戰事爆發以來單日最高數字。法新社援引航運分析機構克普勒公司的數據報道,這一數字意味着霍爾木茲海峽通航量已恢復至戰前近三分之一的水平。這一統計並不完全,實際通過的商船可能更多。綜合倫敦證券交易所集團和克普勒提供的數據,23日又有兩艘滯留波斯灣的超級油輪通過霍爾木茲海峽,兩船各運載200萬桶原油。這些數據表明,儘管伊朗20日宣佈關閉霍爾木茲海峽,但海峽航運仍在持續恢復。 #新華社

3

Signed Evann

23 Jun 2026, 10:47 UTC≈1,270 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Change of call — 今年升息 75bp 預期今年升息三次、各 25bp(9月、10月、12月),政策利率拉到 4.25–4.5% 原本就對 2025 年的降息持懷疑態度;認為數據加上對 Fed reaction function 的重新解讀,意味 Fed 會把那些降息「reverse 回來」 預期明年按兵不動 (on hold);通膨黏性高,real policy rate 不至於過度緊縮 勞動市場:下行風險消散 Powell 去年把 75bp 的降息循環定調為「risk management」,因應勞動數據放緩 今年就業成長回升,顯示當時擔心的下行風險已經消失 U-rate 與去年五月持平,但當時利率高出 75bp、Fed 還沒準備降息 通膨:就是爛 (just bad) 通膨問題明顯惡化;五月 Core PCE 可能達 3.5%,比一年前高近 70bp 部分來自關稅與一次性因素;Fed 原本願意 look

25

Signed Evann

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @Conchstreet120. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Gooaye 股癌
@Gooaye · 105,832
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 August 2026
林睿閎證券分析師-John
@johnstock888 · 49,716
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“貝殼街120號” (@Conchstreet120), 3,228 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Conchstreet120.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.