⚙️ How it Actually Works Instead of just guessing an answer based on its training data, an AI Agent follows a loop (often called "Reason + Act"): 1️⃣ It looks at your goal and breaks it down into a step-by-step plan. 2️⃣ It uses real-world tools to get the job done (like searching the web, running code, or checking a database). 3️⃣ It reviews its own work, catches errors, and keeps trying until the task is completely…

Channel
Conflict Watch Bangla - CWB
@Conflict_Watch_Bangla
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
26,097subscribers
-428 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001928264061 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Conflict_Watch_Bangla |
| Description | যুদ্ধ | সংঘাত | সংবাদ | বিশ্লেষণ War | Conflict | News | Analysis 🔗 ফেসবুক : fb.com/CWB007 🔗 টুইটার : x.com/CW_Bangla 🔗 এডমিন : @CWB_ADMIN_bot 🔗 ডিসকাশন গ্রুপ: : https://t.me/+sM3ERF95uxA4YWJl |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Conflict_Watch_Bangla |
Topic
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 09:59 | 26,097 | -21 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 00:38 | 26,118 | +12 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 02:15 | 26,106 | -9 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:16 | 26,115 | -11 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 15:58 | 26,126 | -19 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 23:38 | 26,145 | -34 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 14:39 | 26,179 | -26 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 13:20 | 26,205 | -16 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:04 | 26,221 | +3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:58 | 26,218 | -6 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 26,224 | -18 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 26,242 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:04 | 26,241 | -7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 26,248 | -9 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:23 | 26,257 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 26,260 | -11 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:36 | 26,271 | -24 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:49 | 26,295 | -16 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 26,311 | -18 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:53 | 26,329 | first reading |
Engagement
95 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.30%
- avg views ÷ 26,097 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,380
- 51 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.991%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 51
- of 95 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 46 of 51 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 95 (29 July 2026 – 19 September 2026) |
| Views total | 70,481 |
| Reactions total | 641 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Sept 2026, 05:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈12,100
- Videos
- ≈7,220
- Links
- ≈1,910
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 55m 54s
- Average length
- 1m 13s
Measured directly from 46 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,642 reactions across 88 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 577 | 35.1% | |
| 🔥 | 201 | 12.2% | |
| 🤣 | 179 | 10.9% | |
| 😁 | 171 | 10.4% | |
| 🤬 | 161 | 9.81% | |
| 👍 | 156 | 9.50% | |
| 👏 | 44 | 2.68% | |
| 😢 | 36 | 2.19% | |
| 😡 | 24 | 1.46% | |
| 🖕 | 20 | 1.22% | |
| 💩 | 18 | 1.10% | |
| 🤮 | 18 | 1.10% | |
| 👎 | 12 | 0.731% | |
| 🤡 | 12 | 0.731% | |
| 😭 | 5 | 0.305% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 0.183% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 0.122% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.122% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.061% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 89 of the 95 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,642 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 95 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 19 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
The Era of Prompt Engineering is Over. Enter Agentic AI. "Prompt engineering is a transitional skill." 🛑 That’s a hard pill to swallow if you've spent the last 12 months mastering the perfect prompt. But the truth is, we are moving past the era where you ask a chatbot one question and hope for a good answer. The true endgame? Agentic AI Workflows. If you want to stay relevant, here is the massive shift happening …
❤2
🚀 Google AI Pro — ১৮ মাসের প্ল্যান মাত্র ৩০০ টাকায়! 🔥 — আপনার কাজকে আরও স্মার্ট করুন! Gemini-কে শুধু প্রশ্ন করার জন্য নয়—পড়াশোনা, research, content creation, productivity ও creative কাজকে আরও সহজ ও দ্রুত করতে ব্যবহার করুন। ✨ 🎯 Google AI Pro-তে থাকছে: ✅ Gemini Pro-এর উন্নত AI সুবিধা ✅ 5 TB Google One Storage ✅ NotebookLM-এর বাড়তি সুবিধা ✅ AI Video Creation & Flow ✅ Gmail & Docs-এ Gemini ✅ আরও অনেক Pro-level AI featu…
❤9😁1
একজন ইয়েমেনি যোদ্ধা পাহাড়ের চূড়ায় থাকা এক সৌদি সেনার দিকে গুলি চালাতে অস্বীকৃতি জানায়, কারণ সে লক্ষ্য করে সেনাটি তখন একাগ্রচিত্তে নামাজ পড়ছে। তার দলের এক সঙ্গী যখন সেনাটিকে লক্ষ্য করে নিশানা ঠিক করছিল, তখন সে ক্ষুব্ধ হয়ে বাধা দেয় এবং নিজের সঙ্গীদেরই কড়া হুঁশিয়ারি দিয়ে বলে, “আল্লাহর কসম, ও নামাজ পড়ছে! যদি কেউ ওর ওপর একটা গুলিও চালায়, তবে আমি তার দুই চোখের মাঝখানে গুলি করব।” সে সবাইকে নামাজ শেষ হওয়া পর্যন্ত অপেক্ষা ক…
❤56🥰1
🚨 দক্ষিণ সৌদি আরবের আবহা শহর এবং খামিস মুশাইতে আনসারাল্লাহর মিসাইল হামলা!
🖕6❤5🥰2
🟥 লাইভ 🟥 দক্ষিণ পশ্চিম ইয়েমেনে খুব তীব্র লড়াই চলছে! সৌদি জোটের বিমান হামলা ভয়ংকর মাত্রায় হচ্ছে! কিন্তু আনসারাল্লাহ এখনো নিজেদের অবস্থান ছাড়ছে না! তারা প্রতিটি পজিশন ধরে রাখার চেষ্টা করছে এবং খুব শক্ত প্রতিরোধ গড়ে তুলেছে!
🔥17❤2👍2👎1
হুথিরা আমাদের সাথে যোগাযোগ করেছে এবং তারা আমাদের সাথে লড়াই করতে চায় না’ — ট্রাম্প তিনি বলেন, গোষ্ঠীটি চায় যুক্তরাষ্ট্র যেন এ থেকে দূরে থাকে এবং তারা অধিকাংশ জাহাজকে চলাচলের সুযোগ দিচ্ছে।
👍11😁8🤡5👎1
Signed MD Shakib Ahmed Narsingdi
গরুকে লাথি মারার অভিযোগে এক মুসলিমকে গরুর পা ছুঁয়ে ক্ষমা চাইতে বাধ্য করলো বজরং দলের উগ্র সন্ত্রাসীরা! ভারতের মধ্যপ্রদেশ রাজ্যে বজরং দলের কিছু উগ্র সন্ত্রাসী সদস্যরা এক বয়স্ক মুসলিম ব্যক্তিকে একটি গরুকে লাথি মারার অভিযোগ তুলেছে। লাথি মারার মতো এমন তুচ্ছ অভিযোগে সেই গরুর সামনে মুসলিম ব্যক্তির মাথা নত করতে, তার পা স্পর্শ করতে এবং অপমানজনকভাবে ক্ষমা চাইতে বাধ্য করে উগ্র সন্ত্রাসীরা।
🤬28❤2
Signed MD Shakib Ahmed Narsingdi
'৯/১১-এর ঘটনাটি আক্ষরিক অর্থেই ছিল আকস্মিক ও অপ্রত্যাশিত' — সাবেক পররাষ্ট্রমন্ত্রী কন্ডোলিজা রাইস 'আমাদের শহরগুলোর ওপর এমন এক আঘাত, যার অভিজ্ঞতা ১৮১২ সালের যুদ্ধের পর আর কখনো হয়নি'
🤣17🖕3
Signed MD Shakib Ahmed Narsingdi
ইরান-সমর্থিত হুথি আনসারুল্লাহ আন্দোলন: গত নয় দিনে আমরা পশ্চিম ইয়েমেনে লোহিত সাগর পর্যন্ত বিস্তৃত ৫,৪০০ বর্গকিলোমিটার এলাকা দখল করেছি।
❤16👍5💩2🖕1
Signed MD Shakib Ahmed Narsingdi
গুলশানে নিষিদ্ধ আওয়ামী লীগের মিছিলের পর ভাটারার ১৭ নম্বর ওয়ার্ডে গোপন বৈঠক; স্থানীয় জনতা ও বিএনপির বাধায় অনুষ্ঠান পণ্ড।
❤8
Signed MD Shakib Ahmed Narsingdi
ট্রাম্প এক সাংবাদিকের সাথে তর্কে জড়িয়ে পড়েন; তিনি নিজের মুখ ওই সাংবাদিকের মুখের খুব কাছে নিয়ে গিয়ে বলেন, "আপনি একটা বিপর্যয়": সাংবাদিক: বর্তমানে আমাদের ঋণের পরিমাণ ৪০ ট্রিলিয়ন ডলার। ভোটারদের ভোটকেন্দ্রে আনার জন্য আপনি কেন তাদের ৫,০০০ ডলারের আর্থিক প্রণোদনা দেওয়ার প্রস্তাব দিচ্ছেন? ট্রাম্প: বাইডেনের কারণে গত চার বছর ধরে যেসব মানুষ ভয়াবহ পরিস্থিতির শিকার হয়েছেন, তাদের জন্যই আমি এটা করছি। সাংবাদিক: আপনি ভোটারদের শুল্ক …
😁16❤3🖕1🤣1
Signed MD Shakib Ahmed Narsingdi
Showing the 12 most recent of 95 posts we hold for @Conflict_Watch_Bangla. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@TimesOfEra · 9,790#1
@inb19 · 47,446#2
@BadrulBSL · 59,021#3
@internationalnews007 · 25,958#4
@ShamsulArefin2091 · 31,680#5
@Muslim_World_News1 · 24,826#6
@warnewsbysakib · 26,226#7
@doamuslimsbangla · 34,424#8
@channelelias · 306,246#9
@kofipost · 14,814#10
@iTahmidtg · 11,255#11
@SorwarAlam · 94,512#12
@MohammadHozaifah · 6,363#13
@SomvabboSotto · 14,242#14
@musafir2476 · 8,357#15
@SocietyUncensored · 13,695#16
@mayraj_neo_official · 14,647#17
@antiquotadu · 38,500#18
@bangladeshislamichhatrashibir · 59,335#19
@imanoamol · 18,333#20
@Turkeypedia · 48,007#21
@unfazedbd · 8,101#22
@Proud_to_be_muslim_Bd · 4,963#23
@azadirdak · 11,582#24
@bjiofficial · 154,190#25
@ka_ege · 6,225#26
@alaqsanewsbangla · 7,238#27
@SadaApronofficial · 36,591#28
@RaiseYourVoice_TG · 4,016#29
@MuslimWorldNews02 · 4,061#30
@MuhmmadMuslim · 4,508#31
@insafTV · 10,998#32
@BWDNs · 3,758#33
@albd1949 · 98,848#34
@qawmitimes · 3,936#35
@dhumketu24h · 3,974#36
@BBCNews_Bengali · 20,693#37
@afghanistanupdates24 · 3,418#38
@newsofabody · 5,778#39
@no_name_3_1_3 · 2,095#40
@toha_mh · 10,925#41
@MuslimBanglaa · 23,031#42
@aljazeerabangla · 12,364#43
@basherkella · 219,969#44
@StudentsAgainstDiscriminationn · 50,290#45
@deen_islam_ofc · 34,028#46
@BringingJusticetoYouBangladesh · 98,122#47
@meersalman1453 · 7,352#48
@withsumonahmed · 17,482#49
@drsalimaldeen · 4,940#50
@TasawwufOfficial · 27,707#51
@newsIEA · 14,735#52
@BdAllStudent · 4,191#53
@bnpbd_org · 108,772#54
@kotaandu · 7,342#55
@sorowar_talks · 25,482#56
@Praachir · 13,444#57
@alolpath · 9,353#58
@masud887 · 30,095#59
@onnodristy · 13,141#60
@contruction23 · 4,098#61
@sunsila144 · 9,744#62
@iftekharjamil · 9,268#63
@StudentsAgainstDiscrimination · 53,192#64
@HinduDhormo · 9,373#65
@trickbd_official · 22,184#66
@WeTheProtestor · 8,090#67
@cognitivecoterie2 · 9,361#68
@muslimbongoo · 1,945#69
@banglanews2026 · 6,097#70
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@warnewsbysakib · 26,226
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 12 September 2026
@inb19 · 47,446
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 26 August 2026
@ShamsulArefin2091 · 31,680
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 5 September 2026
@doamuslimsbangla · 34,424
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 3 September 2026
@MuslimBanglaa · 23,031
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 September 2026
@internationalnews007 · 25,958
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 13 September 2026
@Turkeypedia · 48,007
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 26 August 2026
@SorwarAlam · 94,512
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 23 August 2026
@Islamicpdfshomahar · 22,742
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 20 September 2026
@BadrulBSL · 59,021
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 23 August 2026
@SadaApronofficial · 36,591
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 1 September 2026
@albd1949 · 98,848
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 23 August 2026
@bangladeshislamichhatrashibir · 59,335
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 23 August 2026
@Muslim_World_News1 · 24,826
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 28 here — alongside 27 others — read 15 September 2026
@bjiofficial · 154,190
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 23 August 2026
@deen_islam_ofc · 34,028
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 3 September 2026
@HolyQuran365 · 22,528
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 20 September 2026
@islaMic_fdf · 32,668
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 20 September 2026
@BringingJusticetoYouBangladesh · 98,122
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 23 August 2026
@sorowar_talks · 25,482
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 September 2026
@kuttalig3 · 28,464
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 9 September 2026
@StudentsAgainstDiscrimination · 53,192
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 24 August 2026
@basherkella · 219,969
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 23 August 2026
@TasawwufOfficial · 27,707
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 10 September 2026
This channel appears in 36 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Conflict Watch Bangla - CWB” (@Conflict_Watch_Bangla), 26,097 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Conflict_Watch_Bangla.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.