Photo, posted without a caption
⚡10🔥5👍3❤2

Channel
@ConstitutionEducation
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,111subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001688162450 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ConstitutionEducation |
| Created | 2 April 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ConstitutionEducation |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 04:39 | 2,111 | -3 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 23:36 | 2,114 | +2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 2,112 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:33 | 2,111 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 2,110 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 2,109 | +6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:56 | 2,103 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:13 | 2,104 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 2,101 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:22 | 2,102 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 2,102 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
171 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 75 | 43.9% | |
| 🔥 | 22 | 12.9% | |
| 👍 | 21 | 12.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 16 | 9.36% | |
| ⚡ | 15 | 8.77% | |
| 🏆 | 7 | 4.09% | |
| 🐳 | 4 | 2.34% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 2.34% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 1.75% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 1.17% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 1.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 171 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
⚡10🔥5👍3❤2
Posted without readable text
Hey all! Could I ask you a favor? I changed up the sign up page for private classes so it might be less cluttered. Would some of you be able to take a look and tell me if its user friendly for you? its on www.constitutioneducationpma.com/upcoming-classes. you will need to agree to the members agreement before seeing the page.
❤2
This Monday night at 8 PM ET, we are going to continue a topic, that I had covered a year ago, I had titled the class "liberty on the roads", but we know that challenges to our liberty are not limited to the travelling on the roads. This week we will be chatting about Liberty in everyday life. He who fails to assert his rights have none.... and yet we have been talking about living peacefully, where do those two id…
🔥5❤3
🚨MUST WATCH: SECRETARY SCOTT BESSENT TAKES PRIMETIME TO THE TREASURY DEPARTMENT'S SECRET VAULT 💰🚪🔥 @JesseBWatters 🔗 💥POTUS’s signature on your dollar bill 😃 and his face on a coin ♥️ @CaptKylePatriots
❤6👀2👍2
⏰ We begin in one hour! Tonight we'll be sharing Liberty in Everyday Life together. This isn't a class about learning another process or another document. It's an invitation to step back and ask: What kind of life is all of this meant to produce? If you've ever found yourself thinking, "Just one more class..." "Just one more document..." "Then I'll slow down..." ...I think you'll enjoy tonight's conversation. 🕗 We…
❤2
For your entertainment. Loper Bright is continuing to re-align the system. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DXr9yXJiu1L/?igsh=N3I2MmJmeTJhOW10
❤5
🍎 A little thought before the weekend... One of the ideas we'll be exploring Monday evening is this: Most of us prepare for the rare moments. The traffic stop. The government office. The unexpected letter. And there is wisdom in being prepared. But what if we've become so focused on preparing for the exceptions that we've forgotten to enjoy the ordinary days? That's the conversation. Not less preparation... Just rem…
❤🔥11⚡4🔥3
🌿 This Monday's class has been sitting with me all week. Can I ask you something? How often do you actually interact with the public system? For most of us... it's surprisingly rare. Yet sometimes those rare moments become the center of our thinking. Meanwhile, most of life is happening somewhere else. Around the dinner table. At work. With our children and grandchildren. Building. Creating. Keeping our word. Servi…
❤4
We begin in ONE HOUR! If you've been thinking about joining us for Peacefully Powerful, there's still time. Tonight we'll explore what power really is, why peace is not weakness, and how self-governance, responsibility, and intentional living work together to create lasting influence. 🕗 Tonight at 8:00 PM Eastern 🔗 Sign Up Here: https://www.constitutioneducationpma.com/upcoming-classes 🎥 Can't make it live? No pro…
👍5
Tomorrow evening we begin our Summer 2026 series with a class that has been on my mind for quite some time. Peacefully Powerful isn't really about becoming more powerful. It's about discovering where power has been all along. Over the past year, Constitution Education has gradually shifted from asking, "How do I defend myself?" to asking, "What am I building?" I think this conversation brings those ideas together. …
❤8
🌿 A thought as I prepare for Monday... One year ago, I taught a class called Peacefully Dangerous. Looking back, I still believe much of what we talked about. But over the past year, something has shifted. We've explored trusts, trusteeship, authorship, self-governance, writing, and intentional living. As I looked back over all of those conversations, I realized they all seemed to be pointing toward the same question…
❤7❤🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ConstitutionEducation. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ConstitutionEducation named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Constitution Education PMA” (@ConstitutionEducation), 2,111 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ConstitutionEducation.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.