Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 😈COSA DE INFIELES😈

Channel

😈COSA DE INFIELES😈

@CosaDeInfieles

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

38,228subscribers

+58 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002141626469
TypeChannel
Username@CosaDeInfieles
DescriptionPara publicidad 👇 telega.io/c/CosaDeInfieles Canal de noticias: T.me/NoticiaUrgenteEcuador #infieles #cosadeinfieles
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/CosaDeInfieles

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

38,16338,58438,373.56 August 2026 — 38,170 subscribers7 August 2026 — 38,163 subscribers8 August 2026 — 38,186 subscribers8 August 2026 — 38,201 subscribers9 August 2026 — 38,240 subscribers10 August 2026 — 38,272 subscribers11 August 2026 — 38,234 subscribers12 August 2026 — 38,225 subscribers14 August 2026 — 38,247 subscribers15 August 2026 — 38,303 subscribers16 August 2026 — 38,328 subscribers17 August 2026 — 38,310 subscribers18 August 2026 — 38,301 subscribers19 August 2026 — 38,284 subscribers20 August 2026 — 38,251 subscribers22 August 2026 — 38,298 subscribers24 August 2026 — 38,359 subscribers25 August 2026 — 38,372 subscribers26 August 2026 — 38,392 subscribers27 August 2026 — 38,434 subscribers28 August 2026 — 38,457 subscribers29 August 2026 — 38,490 subscribers30 August 2026 — 38,485 subscribers31 August 2026 — 38,519 subscribers31 August 2026 — 38,516 subscribers1 September 2026 — 38,563 subscribers3 September 2026 — 38,584 subscribers5 September 2026 — 38,539 subscribers8 September 2026 — 38,449 subscribers11 September 2026 — 38,358 subscribers13 September 2026 — 38,298 subscribers14 September 2026 — 38,244 subscribers17 September 2026 — 38,228 subscribers38,2286 August 202617 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net +58. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38,100–38,647 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 00:0038,228-16
14 Sept 2026, 22:3838,244-54
13 Sept 2026, 06:1738,298-60
11 Sept 2026, 05:1938,358-91
8 Sept 2026, 11:4038,449-90
5 Sept 2026, 02:5738,539-45
3 Sept 2026, 09:1838,584+21
1 Sept 2026, 23:2438,563+47
31 Aug 2026, 23:2838,516-3
31 Aug 2026, 00:5738,519+34
30 Aug 2026, 03:4438,485-5
29 Aug 2026, 06:1338,490+33
28 Aug 2026, 09:1838,457+23
27 Aug 2026, 07:2838,434+42
26 Aug 2026, 06:0738,392+20
25 Aug 2026, 04:3738,372+13
24 Aug 2026, 03:3838,359+61
22 Aug 2026, 08:5638,298+47
20 Aug 2026, 22:1238,251-33
19 Aug 2026, 21:3838,284first reading

Engagement

194 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 100 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.26%
avg views ÷ 38,228 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,540
111 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.455%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
128
of 194 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 110 of 111 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 September 2026
Posts held194 (3 August 202618 September 2026)
Views total393,065
Reactions total1,771
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Sept 2026, 22:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
284
Videos
1,520
Links
548

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 14m
Average length
59s

Measured directly from 136 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,908 reactions across 169 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣81828.1%
😁62621.5%
41314.2%
👍29510.1%
😱2257.74%
🔥1364.68%
😈672.30%
🤪461.58%
🤬311.07%
😴301.03%
👎270.928%
👏220.757%
🌚210.722%
👻200.688%
🤷‍♂160.55%
❤‍🔥150.516%
💅140.481%
🥴140.481%
🤯120.413%
🫡120.413%
12 further kinds481.65%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 172 of the 194 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,948 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 194 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 18 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 173 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @CosaDeInfieles. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 194 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 18 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

18 Sept 2026, 14:48 UTC895 views6 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Forwarded from @rybarespPhoto

📝¿Y si?📝 Los Geran impulsados por turbina terminan en México La "manía de los geran a reacción" ya ha arrasado varias regiones: rumores sobre posibles drones Geran-5 rusos apareciendo en Oriente Medio, en Corea del Norte, y ahora la atención se dirigió a México después de que exhibieran copias reales de Geran en su desfile. Y surge la pregunta: ¿y si México obtiene drones rusos reales en lugar de imitaciones patéti

👍32🔥1

18 Sept 2026, 14:07 UTC≈1,000 views7 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤣6👎1

18 Sept 2026, 00:13 UTC≈2,440 views5 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

🩸🩸🩸🅰️ 🩸🩸🩸1️⃣🩸🩸 AMAÑADOS☠ - un canal con un mundo de pesadillas, al que solo acuden aquellos que confían en sus nervios👇 https://t.me/+xS8BJgWo41JhODhk

👍2😱2🔥1

18 Sept 2026, 00:13 UTC≈2,440 views11 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤣8😱2😢1

17 Sept 2026, 11:34 UTC≈2,870 views8 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Forwarded from @liusivayaPhoto

Noticia importante: Habrá aún más drones rusos a reacción Geran-4 y Geran-5. El OSINT ucraniano acaba de publicar imágenes satelitales de Alabuga. Nuevos talleres están surgiendo en el sur de la zona económica especial: al menos cinco largos pabellones de producción ya están en pie, se han trazado carreteras y aún se están construyendo más edificios. Es una cuestión de escala. El FT informó que Irán ya ha solicita

5👍2🔥1

17 Sept 2026, 11:33 UTC≈2,480 views15 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤬76👎2

17 Sept 2026, 05:29 UTC≈2,650 views6 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

4😱2

16 Sept 2026, 18:16 UTC≈3,050 views13 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🌚102❤‍🔥1

16 Sept 2026, 14:44 UTC≈3,160 views26 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤣23👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 194 posts we hold for @CosaDeInfieles. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@CosaDeInfieles edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
27 August 2026
Most recent edit
6 September 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“😈COSA DE INFIELES😈” (@CosaDeInfieles), 38,228 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CosaDeInfieles.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.