Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
اقتباسات ، كتاباتي ، حب ، نرجسية 🖤 .
@Costs_Duties
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
29,071subscribers
-1,593 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002145854980 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @Costs_Duties @ElEEEll |
| Description | - 📜 اقتباسات حب، خواطر، كتابات قصيرة، رسائل رومانسية، كلمات تلامس القلب، حالات واتساب، ستوريات يومية 🖤 ▹ .. |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Costs_Duties |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 01:20 | 29,071 | -68 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 17:39 | 29,139 | -55 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 02:17 | 29,194 | -56 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:21 | 29,250 | -58 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 13:17 | 29,308 | -100 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 03:22 | 29,408 | no change |
| 8 Sept 2026, 02:47 | 29,408 | +29,407 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:24 | 1 | -29,684 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:35 | 29,685 | -35 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 29,720 | -20 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:11 | 29,740 | -41 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:26 | 29,781 | -43 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:27 | 29,824 | -12 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 29,836 | -46 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:42 | 29,882 | -64 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:03 | 29,946 | -71 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 30,017 | -58 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 17:58 | 30,075 | -22 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:36 | 30,097 | -20 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:42 | 30,117 | first reading |
Engagement
84 posts held, back to 18 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.62%
- avg views ÷ 29,071 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 470
- 22 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 22
- of 84 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 84 (18 June 2025 – 14 September 2026) |
| Views total | 10,331 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Sept 2026, 07:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 430
- Videos
- 210
- Links
- 130
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 1m 06s
- Average length
- 22s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
125 reactions across 22 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 105 | 84.0% | |
| 🕊 | 14 | 11.2% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 3.20% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 1.60% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 84 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 156 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 84 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2025 to 14 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 84 we hold a reading for · 1%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Costs_Duties. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 84 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 June 2025 to 14 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
_
ه -من شِدة شعوري المَجهول ، أصبحتُ أسمع صوتًا للهِدوء . ،،
ه ويستحوذ عليّ شعور غريب، بأنني لم أعد كما كُنت. ،،
ستُرهق قلبك ولنّ يحدث إلا ما شاء الله.
وُأَعوُذْ بك يا الله أَن يرى ضعفي غيرك.
لا ترفع سقف توقعاتك إلا مع الله.
تبتسميّن فَيتقلّص البؤس ويكبر حَجم السّلام .
Sticker, posted without a caption
يا هلا بالطالب الجامعي والدراسات العليا وحتى ثانوي! 👋 تعبان من كتابة البحوث والمشاريع وتبغى أحد يساعدك؟ 🤔📚 منصة إبداع هي الحل! 😎 نكتب لك البحوث والمشاريع الأكاديمية باحترافية وجودة عالية، ابد ما عليك هم. 💯✍️ عندنا مختصين في كل مجال تقريبًا، من بحوث المواد لمشاريع التخرج (ثانوي وجامعة) ورسايل الماجستير والدكتوراة، كل التخصصات موجودة. 👩🎓🎓🔬📚👨💼 وش نسوي لك بالضبط؟ * نختار لك موضوع مميز للبحث أو المشروع 🤔💡 * نسوي لك…
عزيزنا العميل، هل تعلم أن مراجعتك للمشروع اللي نسويه لك قبل لاتسلمه، تعتبر أهم جزئية يقيمك عليها المشرف على مشروعك او بحثك.. ف فضلاً راجع اي عمل نقوم به لك لكي تأخذ الدرجة التي ترضيك.. ودائماً نحن حاضرون لأي تعديل بعد التسليم وبشكل مجاني حتى تنتهي وتسلمه💐 ------- للحجز والاستفسار: 🌐 واتساب: 0533900132 الرابط المباشر للواتس👇 ا 📎 Wa.me/966533900132 . 🌐 تيليجرام: @Faiiez .
رغم مانطلب من العملاء يقولون لنا كيف كانت النتيجه؛ مع ذلك بعضهم يرجع ويشكرنا وهنا بعض منهم، والحمدلله هذا الشيء يحفزنا في المضي قدماً بإخلاص واتقان 💐------- للحجز والاستفسار: . الرابط المباشر للواتس👇 ا 📎 Wa.me/966539964594 . 🌐 واتساب: 0539964594 . 🌐 تيليجرام: @Faiiez .
Showing the 12 most recent of 84 posts we hold for @Costs_Duties. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Costs_Duties edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 9 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 10 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@ozsosz · 15,42938 posts⚫️روائع🥀الڪلمات📚
@wevew · 8,13722 postsاسلاميـــــات🤍
@Aslameoo · 5,3237 postsقناة إسلامية
@b5i38Cu0ystjN2Jh · 3615 postsشموخ يمانية للخياطه 🪡🧵🧶
@A_a_B_m · 2,1983 postsحالات واتس اب قرآنية مقاطع قصيرة:
@BAWHSCIENCEB · 1,0103 posts؏ــطـر الـجـنــهۂ♡
@Eatar_aljanah · 2,2673 postsعبارات واقتباسات اسلامية
@httpjdk · 2,5283 postsخواطر 🕊️🥀
@khwateer12 · 2,3713 posts✨🕊ادخلوها بسلام🕊✨
@b12af · 3112 postsفذڪڒ فإن آلذڪڒى تنفع آلمؤمنين 𖢬
@II_v_12 · 1912 postsلـ فَقِيدي|•💔🥀
@a_a_o13 · 1,1191 postهدايا مكة
@Makkah_Gifts · 2,8561 post🌸🔹غذاء الروح🔹🌸
@osm_h · 7851 postاشيائي
@Sanaaayemen · 71 post- طور ذاتك💡.
@V_Y_YV · 2,9451 postكتابات مراهقه📓.
@V_Z_Y_S · 2,3061 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Q_R_N9 · 79,232
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 21 August 2026
@qwowhamie · 99,681
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 15 August 2026
@ekraly · 72,711
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 August 2026
@Zad_Re · 71,887
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
@Q_urany · 44,305
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 28 August 2026
@almshrgii · 123,019
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 August 2026
@veee_1 · 48,443
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
@bisharalibrary · 132,930
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 August 2026
@HADILBET · 320,255
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
@hdkckdks · 52,829
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 24 August 2026
@Eng365 · 124,949
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
@P_HSHS8 · 84,693
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اقتباسات ، كتاباتي ، حب ، نرجسية 🖤 .” (@Costs_Duties), 29,071 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Costs_Duties.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.