Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CrazySnep Animations (Extreme)

Channel

CrazySnep Animations (Extreme)

@CrazySnepExtreme

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

145subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001506735104
TypeChannel
Username@CrazySnepExtreme
Created19 July 2022measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/CrazySnepExtreme

Growth

1431471456 August 2026 — 147 subscribers8 August 2026 — 147 subscribers13 August 2026 — 145 subscribers21 August 2026 — 143 subscribers27 August 2026 — 144 subscribers11 September 2026 — 145 subscribers6 August 202611 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 36 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 142–148 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 14:17145+1
27 Aug 2026, 22:44144+1
21 Aug 2026, 03:12143-2
13 Aug 2026, 05:17145-2
8 Aug 2026, 20:46147no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:17147first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 19 July 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 May 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

177 reactions across 6 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3519.8%
💩3117.5%
🤨2413.6%
🐳1810.2%
🥴179.60%
❤‍🔥147.91%
👍63.39%
🔥63.39%
😱52.82%
31.69%
🌭31.69%
🍌31.69%
👎31.69%
😍31.69%
🤯31.69%
🗿21.13%
🍓10.565%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 177 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2022 to 28 May 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 May 2023, 13:03 UTC≈7,580 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

🐳115👍2😍21❤‍🔥1🗿1

27 May 2023, 16:22 UTC≈6,630 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

The weird thing is, most of complex FX is in the "extreme" stickers, so this is the only channel where I can flex how I drew the stream. So... Notice how the piss stream in the mouth has a contour, yet some of the liquid is "attached" to the swallowing character, and some to the pissing character? It's actually implemented within one layer in After Effects, which allows to use just one shared fill and one shared st

7🔥3🤯3👎2🌭1🍌1🍓1👍1

27 May 2023, 16:01 UTC≈5,970 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥12🤨5🌭2🔥21👍1

16 Jan 2023, 00:19 UTC≈6,030 viewsread 8 August 2026

New link for the recent stickers: https://t.me/addstickers/FelixTheAussieAnimatedFetish

14 Dec 2022, 23:26 UTC≈6,190 views59 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

💩27🤨19🥴731❤‍🔥1🗿1

20 Nov 2022, 22:27 UTC≈5,810 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

🥴10🐳52👍2👎1

28 Aug 2022, 13:39 UTC≈28,000 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

18😱5💩4🍌2🐳2🔥1

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @CrazySnepExtreme. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CrazySnep Animations (Extreme)” (@CrazySnepExtreme), 145 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CrazySnepExtreme.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.