Asian Teams in SENA Tests (In Last 8 years) 12 Wins - India 3 Wins - Srilanka 2 Wins - Bangladesh 0 Win - Pakistan*
👍2🏆1🥰1😍1

Channel
@CricketHomie
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,802subscribers
-687 since we began measuring on 22 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001821960602 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CricketHomie |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 22 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CricketHomie |
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:38 | 4,802 | -137 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 07:38 | 4,939 | -161 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 17:17 | 5,100 | -47 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 05:21 | 5,147 | -118 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 5,265 | -115 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:49 | 5,380 | -37 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 09:18 | 5,417 | -47 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:53 | 5,464 | -25 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 5,489 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
164 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 51 | 31.1% | |
| 👍 | 37 | 22.6% | |
| 🥰 | 31 | 18.9% | |
| 😍 | 22 | 13.4% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 3.66% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 2.44% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 1.83% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 1.22% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 1.22% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 1.22% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 1.22% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.61% | |
| 😈 | 1 | 0.61% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 164 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 August 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Asian Teams in SENA Tests (In Last 8 years) 12 Wins - India 3 Wins - Srilanka 2 Wins - Bangladesh 0 Win - Pakistan*
👍2🏆1🥰1😍1
🚨 ENGLAND DEFEATED PAKISTAN BY INNINGS & 103 RUNS IN 1st TEST. 🔥❤️ Ollie Robinson - 8 wickets Josh Tongue - 8 wickets Great start for Joe Root 2.0 Era in Captaincy.
❤3👍2😍1
WTC 2025 - 27 Points Table: (After #ENGvsPAK at Leeds) 🇦🇺 77.78% - Australia 🇿🇦 75.00% - South Africa 🇳🇿 72.22% - New Zealand 🇧🇩 66.67% - Bangladesh 🇮🇳 53.33% - India 🇱🇰 33.33% - Sri Lanka 🏴 29.76% - England 🌴 20.83% - West Indies 🇵🇰 19.05% - Pakistan
🤣3😍2❤1👍1
•Pakistan were 0-1 in first innings •Pakistan are 0-1 in second innings
❤7👍1🤣1😍1
JOE ROOT IN ICC WORLD TEST CHAMPIONSHIP: - 2nd Most runs in 2019/21. - Most runs in 2021/23. - Most runs in 2023/25. - Most runs in 2025/27*. - Most Runs in overall. Joe Root - The Greatest Batter in WTC History! 🫡
👍4❤3😍2
High Commissioner of India to Sri Lanka hosted Team India at the India House in Colombo.
❤6👍2
HARRY BROOK IN TEST CRICKET: Matches - 39. Innings - 67. Average - 53.63. Strike rate - 87.08. Hundreds - 10. Fifties - 19. The No.1 Test Batter in the World for a reason - Incredible, Brook!🫡
👍4🥰4❤1
- 19 Innings - 913 runs - 50.72 Average - 3 Hundreds - 4 Fifties KL Rahul has been fanstatic in WTC 2025-27 Cycle 🇮🇳
👍5😍5🔥3
Cameron Green 🎤 “MS Dhoni is like a God in Chennai. When he walks out to bat the crowd erupts.” (The Grade Cricketer)
❤4👍1🥰1😁1😍1
IPL Coaches Salary: Who Earns the Most? Ricky Ponting, PBKS : ₹9.5 crore/year Ashish Nehra, GT: ₹9.5 crore/year Stephen Fleming, CSK: ₹7.5 crore/year Yuvraj Singh, DC : ₹6+ crore/year [Exp] Zaheer Khan, LSG : ₹5 crore/year Rahul Dravid, RR : ₹4.5 crore/year Andy Flower, RCB : ₹4 crore/year Justin Langer, LSG : ₹4 crore/year Ricky Ponting and Ashish Nehra were highest earners.
❤5👍2🔥1🥰1
🚨 BREAKING NEWS - India's tour of Bangladesh could be postponed yet again. The BCB announced in January that India would tour to Bangladesh for a white ball series.
🥰4👏1😍1
Before today’s innings, Joe Root needed 67 runs to bring his intl batting average up to 50.00, but he was dismissed for 66 😷💔 Highest Average in Intl Cricket (All formats || min 10000 runs) 52.71 - Virat Kohli 49.99 - 𝗝𝗼𝗲 𝗥𝗼𝗼𝘁* 49.10 - Jacques kallis 49.00 - Michael Hussey 48.75 - Viv Richards 48.52 - Sachin Tendulkar 48.12 - Kane Williamson 48.11 - AB Devilliers 47.77 - Steve Smith
👍4❤2🥰1😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CricketHomie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cricket Homie (Cricket News & Update)” (@CricketHomie), 4,802 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CricketHomie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.