Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Critical Zones Pro (MT5)

Channel

Critical Zones Pro (MT5)

@CriticalZonesPro

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

704subscribers

-49 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001851326077
TypeChannel
Username@CriticalZonesPro
Created11 February 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 November 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/CriticalZonesPro

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Previous handles

@CriticalZonesPro was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@niftylevelsbyalgo
held 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026

Growth

704753728.57 August 2026 — 753 subscribers7 August 2026 — 749 subscribers8 August 2026 — 749 subscribers10 September 2026 — 717 subscribers10 September 2026 — 717 subscribers12 September 2026 — 715 subscribers2 October 2026 — 717 subscribers13 October 2026 — 707 subscribers19 October 2026 — 704 subscribers25 October 2026 — 705 subscribers2 November 2026 — 704 subscribers7 August 20262 November 2026
11 measurements spanning 87 days, net -49. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 697–760 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Nov 2026, 02:08704-1
25 Oct 2026, 12:35705+1
19 Oct 2026, 10:17704-3
13 Oct 2026, 03:08707-10
2 Oct 2026, 03:17717+2
12 Sept 2026, 06:18715-2
10 Sept 2026, 13:22717no change
10 Sept 2026, 12:47717-32
8 Aug 2026, 02:01749no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:26749-4
7 Aug 2026, 13:49753first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 11 February 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 25 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

10 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤880.0%
👍110.0%
🔥110.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2023 to 10 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Sept 2026, 04:50 UTC216 views1 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Photo

USOIL NOT ABLE TO CLOSE THE CANDLE ABOVE WEEKLY RESISTANCE ZONE

❤1

9 Sept 2026, 17:08 UTC56 viewsread 10 September 2026
Photo

US OIL , AFTER BREAKOUT AND CONFIRMATION FRON WEEKLY PIVOT ZONE-2 TOUCHED THE WEEKLY RESISTANCE ZONE . GIVE 2 CHANCE OF ENTRY

2 Sept 2026, 03:09 UTC427 views2 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Photo

USOIL INTRADAY ZONES. YESTERDAY AFTER BREAKOUT OF RESISTANCE ZONE WORKED AS SUPPORT

❤2

1 Sept 2026, 14:18 UTC122 views1 reactionsread 10 September 2026

🚀 MT5 USERS – LIVE DEMO NOW AVAILABLE We are excited to announce that our Weekly & Intraday Zones Indicator is now ready for LIVE DEMO on MT5. This powerful indicator is designed to bring structure, precision & discipline to your trading. 📊 What it offers: • 1️⃣ Weekly Support Zone (Green) • 2️⃣ Pivot Zone-1 (Lower Blue) • 3️⃣ Pivot Zone-2 (Upper Blue) • 4️⃣ Weekly Resistance Zone (Red) These 4 critical zones hel…

❤1

26 Aug 2026, 02:35 UTC151 views1 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Photo

Going to Hit next target after breakdown /Conslidation/retest in Pivot Zone-1

🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @CriticalZonesPro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Aug 2026, 17:27 UTCAnonymous Poll4 voters

On which asset you like to trade.

  1. XAUUSD50%
  2. XNGUSD25%
  3. XAGUSD75%
  4. OTHERS25%

The shares total 175%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

7 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTCAnonymous Poll4 voters

How many of you are using the MT5 platform,

  1. No0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2023 to 10 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

TRADING WITH KAPIL
@tradingwithkapil_kapil_maurya · 27,555
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 14 September 2026
CPR BY KGS
@cprbykgs · 27,388
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Critical Zones Pro (MT5)” (@CriticalZonesPro), 704 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CriticalZonesPro.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.