Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Crypto Angels

Channel

Crypto Angels

@CryptoAngelsUK

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

29,147subscribers

-924 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001239304207
TypeChannel
Username@CryptoAngelsUK
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CryptoAngelsUK

Growth

29,14730,07129,6096 August 2026 — 30,071 subscribers6 August 2026 — 30,071 subscribers7 August 2026 — 30,045 subscribers8 August 2026 — 30,016 subscribers9 August 2026 — 29,975 subscribers9 August 2026 — 29,944 subscribers10 August 2026 — 29,891 subscribers11 August 2026 — 29,861 subscribers12 August 2026 — 29,824 subscribers14 August 2026 — 29,771 subscribers15 August 2026 — 29,727 subscribers16 August 2026 — 29,657 subscribers17 August 2026 — 29,619 subscribers18 August 2026 — 29,544 subscribers19 August 2026 — 29,471 subscribers20 August 2026 — 29,445 subscribers21 August 2026 — 29,419 subscribers23 August 2026 — 29,357 subscribers24 August 2026 — 29,306 subscribers25 August 2026 — 29,265 subscribers26 August 2026 — 29,244 subscribers27 August 2026 — 29,230 subscribers28 August 2026 — 29,202 subscribers30 August 2026 — 29,166 subscribers30 August 2026 — 29,147 subscribers6 August 202630 August 2026
25 measurements spanning 25 days, net -924. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,008–30,210 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 21:5429,147-19
30 Aug 2026, 01:1529,166-36
28 Aug 2026, 22:5629,202-28
27 Aug 2026, 19:2829,230-14
26 Aug 2026, 21:5429,244-21
25 Aug 2026, 22:3829,265-41
24 Aug 2026, 23:3729,306-51
23 Aug 2026, 10:3629,357-62
21 Aug 2026, 18:2729,419-26
20 Aug 2026, 17:0429,445-26
19 Aug 2026, 18:2229,471-73
18 Aug 2026, 16:2429,544-75
17 Aug 2026, 19:2429,619-38
16 Aug 2026, 20:0329,657-70
15 Aug 2026, 05:3829,727-44
14 Aug 2026, 00:3729,771-53
12 Aug 2026, 22:0529,824-37
11 Aug 2026, 20:5229,861-30
10 Aug 2026, 20:5529,891-53
9 Aug 2026, 23:3129,944first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

8 Jun 2026, 07:47 UTC≈6,750 viewsread 30 August 2026
Photo

🚀 SpaceX IPO: The Opportunity Retail Investors Have Been Waiting Years For There are thousands of public companies available to invest in today. But only a handful generate excitement before they even reach public markets. SpaceX belongs to that category. For years, investors have watched the company grow from an ambitious startup into one of the most valuable private businesses on the planet. Today, SpaceX opera

11 Mar 2026, 04:36 UTC≈6,390 viewsread 30 August 2026
Photo

BTC.D Bitcoin dominance is still stuck in the range between 58-60%. It's been in the same range for months now. As expected after tapping into the lower range area, BTC.D bounced back and is heading towards the higher range area at 60%. If the momentum continues, then we may see it at 60% or higher levels. We may see massive movement on either side once it breaks out of the range. Until then, we may see the choppy m

11 Mar 2026, 04:27 UTC≈6,640 viewsread 30 August 2026
Photo

BTC Nothing changes in the BTC scenario. The pullback from the 66k-65k zone continues nearly to 72k and then retraces back to 69k immediately. As mentioned earlier, until BTC stays below the 74k zone, the bias for BTC remains bearish. We are still expecting BTC at 61k or lower levels until it flips the 74k level. We will try to keep updating accordingly !!! @CryptoAngelsUK ​

10 Mar 2026, 05:46 UTC≈6,340 viewsread 30 August 2026
Photo

BTC So far, BTC is moving as expected. As mentioned, we got the pullback from the 66k-65k zone. But the overall scenario is still unchanged. As mentioned earlier, as long as BTC stays below the 74k level, we are expecting BTC at 61k or lower levels in coming days. But if the 74k level gets flipped, then we may expect continuous bullish momentum. We will try to keep updating accordingly !!! @CryptoAngelsUK ​

9 Mar 2026, 13:13 UTC≈6,420 viewsread 30 August 2026

Rez holding well retest done .. its will go for tp soon.. parabolic movement soon. @CryptoAngelsUK ​

9 Mar 2026, 09:22 UTC≈5,960 viewsread 30 August 2026

Load some Rez and hold Expecting 10-20% in shortterm @CryptoAngelsUK ​

9 Mar 2026, 09:20 UTC≈6,000 viewsread 30 August 2026
Photo

REZ/USDT (Binance) BUY : 0.0031 - 0.00333 CMP- 0.00331 Target: 0.00347 - 0.0037 - 0.004🔥🚀 Sl - 0.003 Chart looks good just buy and hold. @CryptoAngelsUK ​

9 Mar 2026, 03:58 UTC≈6,040 viewsread 30 August 2026
Photo

BTC BTC is moving as expected. As mentioned, BTC is trying to pull back from the 65k-66k zone. We may see some pullback in the short term, but the overall scenario is still bearish. We are still expecting BTC at 61k or lower levels before the move towards higher levels. This bias is valid as long as it stays below the 74k level. We will try to keep updating accordingly !!! @CryptoAngelsUK ​

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CryptoAngelsUK. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,272,541 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto Angels” (@CryptoAngelsUK), 29,147 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoAngelsUK.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.