Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CryptoCove Reports

Channel

CryptoCove Reports

@CryptoCoveReports

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,204subscribers

+12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001655975198
TypeChannel
Username@CryptoCoveReports
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/CryptoCoveReports

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,1921,2081,2007 August 2026 — 1,192 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,193 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,194 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,196 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,197 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,199 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,195 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,197 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,200 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,202 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,201 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,208 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,207 subscribers17 September 2026 — 1,204 subscribers1,2047 August 202617 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net +12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,190–1,210 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 21:181,204-3
13 Sept 2026, 15:371,207-1
9 Sept 2026, 18:171,208+7
4 Sept 2026, 07:021,201-1
31 Aug 2026, 17:471,202+2
29 Aug 2026, 01:581,200+3
26 Aug 2026, 01:421,197+2
22 Aug 2026, 19:561,195-4
19 Aug 2026, 15:031,199+2
16 Aug 2026, 21:531,197+1
14 Aug 2026, 00:141,196+2
11 Aug 2026, 02:451,194+1
8 Aug 2026, 03:261,193+1
7 Aug 2026, 07:331,192first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 June 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

112 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5044.6%
3228.6%
👍2925.9%
👏10.893%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2024 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC≈4,440 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Premium Monthly Report (July) We have Made +103% Profit from 12 Calls with 100% Success Rate..🫡 5 Calls are Still in Play (No Profit/Loss).. 🏄‍♂️

1👍1👏1

2 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC192 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Premium Monthly Report (June) We have made +75% Profit from just 6 Calls with 75% Success Rate..🏄‍♂️

👍1

2 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC199 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Premium Monthly Report (May) We have Made +148% Profit from 15 Calls with 85% Success Rate..😊

1👍1

1 May 2026, 06:14 UTC≈6,940 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Premium Monthly Report (April) We have Made +421% Profit from 21 Calls with 94% Success Rate..😊 5 Calls are Still in Play (No Profit/Loss) 🏄‍♂️

5 Apr 2026, 07:48 UTC≈5,790 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Premium Monthly Report (March) We've made +140% Profit from 11 Calls With 100% Success Rate..😊 Mostly Trades are Still in Play..🏄‍♂️

3

5 Apr 2026, 07:08 UTC970 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Premium Monthly Report (February) We've made +77% Profit from 8 Calls With 75% Success Rate..😊

1🔥1

2 Jan 2026, 08:03 UTC≈8,320 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Premium Monthly Report (December) We've made +382% Profit from 31 Calls with 76% Success Rate.. 🔥📈

2🔥1

2 Dec 2025, 05:04 UTC≈9,810 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Premium Monthly Report (November) We've made +396% Profit from 21 Calls with 82% Success Rate..🏄‍♂️

1 Aug 2025, 04:25 UTC≈15,400 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Premium Monthly Report (July) We've made +809% Profit from 47 Calls with 88% Success Rate..🔥📈

🔥43

1 Jun 2025, 07:17 UTC≈13,700 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Premium Monthly Report (May) We've made +1035% Profit from 43 Spot Calls with 89% Success Rate..🔥 8 Calls Are Still in Play & Still Holding..!!

🔥42

1 May 2025, 06:53 UTC≈12,600 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📌 Premium Monthly Report (April) We've made +506% Profit from 29 Calls with 100% Success Rate.. 🔥

👍9🔥41

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CryptoCoveReports. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Learning Markets With Manish Official
@Learning_Markets_With_Manish_B · 58,506
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CryptoCove Reports” (@CryptoCoveReports), 1,204 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoCoveReports.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.