Channel
@CryptoFun101Channel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001424323612 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CryptoFun101Channel |
| Description | @CryptoFun101 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 22 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CryptoFun101Channel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:33 | 4 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:15 | 4 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 22 July 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 May 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 7 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
At long last, BIP341/342 ("taproot") are active on Bitcoin mainnet. Thanks to everyone involved for getting us this far! The real work will be in building wallets/protocols that build on top of it to make use of its advantages. I'm very excited to see where that takes us. - Pieter Wuille https://twitter.com/pwuille/status/1459778730369368067
There is an inflection point with inflation where holding fiat even for a day, or a few hours, will be excruciating. Learning to live in #Bitcoin now front loads the pain and transforms it into empowerment. #GetOnZero - LaserHodl https://twitter.com/laserhodl/status/1458537123754266632
#Bitcoin price: 2015 “too expensive” 2016 “too expensive” 2017 “too expensive” 2018 “too expensive” 2019 “too expensive” 2020 "too expensive" 2021 "too expensive" Bitcoin is always "too expensive" for those who don't believe. They'll pay a hefty price later. - Dan Held https://twitter.com/danheld/status/1458828292098777093
People who hate #Bitcoin don’t like the truth. - Cedric Youngelman https://twitter.com/CedYoungelman/status/1359327493593985024
Photo, posted without a caption
Proof of Work means that even if you had the money, you couldn’t just buy hashrate dominance. You’d need hardware, infrastructure, and energy. None of the three are readily available - in fact, large scale new energy sources may take years to build out and harness. #Bitcoin - Samson Mow https://twitter.com/Excellion/status/1452971350348419076
#BITCOIN ISN'T GOING UP BECAUSE OF AN ETF APPROVAL AN ETF APPROVAL HAPPENS BECAUSE BITCOIN IS GOING UP - Mandrik https://twitter.com/Mandrik/status/1450510593169965057
Photo, posted without a caption
We powered the world with electrical energy. It is time to empower the world with digital energy. #Bitcoin - Michael Saylor https://twitter.com/michael_saylor/status/1442826412721856517
Volcano-powered #bitcoin mining is coming to El Salvador. https://www.btctimes.com/news/el-salvador-volcano-mining-takes-shape
For the record, the price of #Bitcoin was $1,022 when China first banned it in 2013. - Documenting Bitcoin https://twitter.com/DocumentingBTC/status/1441449160813723648
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CryptoFun101Channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Fundamentals 101” (@CryptoFun101Channel), 4 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoFun101Channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.