A big collaboration with XT is coming🙌

Channel
Crypto Map
@CryptoGridMap1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,463subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 3 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002104052273 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CryptoGridMap1 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 3 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CryptoGridMap1 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 18:20 | 2,463 | -1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 22:22 | 2,464 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 30 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 March 2025 to 21 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
The bear market is like this: after a strong downward move, it fluctuates up and down several times, even breaks a few minor resistance levels, and its candlestick patterns turn bullish. Because you have a mental bias expecting the market to recover, you get your hopes up and might even open a position. Then, it makes another strong new downward move, sweeping away all your analyses and positions! And this story rep…
Bitcoin's monthly candle also closed last night And it started December stormily!!! 85k
Since some people asked, I'm posting this here: All these green candles you've seen this week still haven't even managed to cover the body of last week's candle! We haven't had any specific change in the downward trend so far
Bitcoin ETFs are an interesting phenomenon. With their launch in 2025, liquidity flow into the crypto market—especially Bitcoin—became easier and faster. However, no one anticipated that this development would also have a downside: during times of fear, it accelerates capital outflows as well!
Look, friends, in my opinion, given the heavy trends that have been broken, I currently see a low probability that 80k will be the market bottom. On the other hand, next week marks the official end of the QT (Quantitative Tightening) policy, and probably some time after that, the expansionary QE (Quantitative Easing) policy will begin, which is inherently good for the markets. We also have that story about Trump's s…
❤1
The market is stuck at a good level. If today's NFP data comes in strong, it could complete its pullback to 100k…
#Bitcoin Cycle Timing
The weekly candle has closed. The first weekly candle below $100,000 after 26 weeks (6 months)!!
...
⚡️ Summary of Ray Dalio's recent article: Ray Dalio says the world, especially the US, is approaching the end of a "big debt cycle"—a cycle where countries gradually borrow more and more, print money, and eventually reach a point where everything becomes artificially overheated, like a bubble on top of a bubble. You should know that the Federal Reserve recently announced it plans to shift from QT (quantitative tigh…
What I'm seeing suggests the chart pattern indicates we might test the flag's upper boundary again soon, around 120-121. There's a DP (Decision Point) zone there, and it's too early to make a call now. But if it successfully breaks through, we can start thinking about new highs again. As for below the flag—we've already discussed that—we should be prepared for stop-losses to trigger
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CryptoGridMap1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@mokale7 · 33,851
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 3 September 2026
@nbookcity · 31,791
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 5 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Map” (@CryptoGridMap1), 2,463 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoGridMap1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.