Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Crypto Market Intel

Channel

Crypto Market Intel

@CryptoMarketIntelHQ

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

20,558subscribers

-527 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001282893927
TypeChannel
Username@CryptoMarketIntelHQ
Description📩 Paid Promotion 👉 @Bhanu240 Crypto Market Intel provides professional analysis, real-time market news, and expert insights on digital assets. Buy ads: https://telega.io/c/CryptoMarketIntelHQ
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/CryptoMarketIntelHQ

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

20,55821,08520,821.57 August 2026 — 21,085 subscribers8 August 2026 — 21,069 subscribers9 August 2026 — 21,046 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,030 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,010 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,989 subscribers13 August 2026 — 20,956 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,938 subscribers16 August 2026 — 20,910 subscribers17 August 2026 — 20,880 subscribers18 August 2026 — 20,847 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20,818 subscribers20 August 2026 — 20,804 subscribers22 August 2026 — 20,784 subscribers23 August 2026 — 20,746 subscribers25 August 2026 — 20,712 subscribers25 August 2026 — 20,684 subscribers27 August 2026 — 20,669 subscribers28 August 2026 — 20,656 subscribers29 August 2026 — 20,640 subscribers30 August 2026 — 20,628 subscribers31 August 2026 — 20,601 subscribers1 September 2026 — 20,579 subscribers2 September 2026 — 20,558 subscribers7 August 20262 September 2026
24 measurements spanning 26 days, net -527. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,479–21,164 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 04:5620,558-21
1 Sept 2026, 03:2920,579-22
31 Aug 2026, 01:1520,601-27
30 Aug 2026, 04:4620,628-12
29 Aug 2026, 05:3420,640-16
28 Aug 2026, 05:4420,656-13
27 Aug 2026, 02:2220,669-15
25 Aug 2026, 23:3420,684-28
25 Aug 2026, 01:4320,712-34
23 Aug 2026, 16:4720,746-38
22 Aug 2026, 01:5820,784-20
20 Aug 2026, 19:2320,804-14
19 Aug 2026, 17:0720,818-29
18 Aug 2026, 14:3320,847-33
17 Aug 2026, 12:1220,880-30
16 Aug 2026, 02:2920,910-28
14 Aug 2026, 10:3720,938-18
13 Aug 2026, 04:5520,956-33
12 Aug 2026, 02:1720,989-21
10 Aug 2026, 23:3121,010first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 14 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
65.9%
avg views ÷ 20,558 subscribers
Avg views / post
13,600
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.609%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026
Posts held23 (14 June 202630 August 2026)
Views total54,200
Reactions total330
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 12:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
151
Videos
3
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
43s
Average length
43s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,547 reactions across 23 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
43317.0%
😍38415.1%
🤩37414.7%
👍34213.4%
🔥33713.2%
💯32812.9%
30011.8%
🥰200.785%
🎉150.589%
👌110.432%
🏆10.039%
🙏10.039%
🤗10.039%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,547 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Aug 2026, 12:53 UTC≈12,600 views89 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Posted without readable text

😍49🤩26👍111👌1🔥1

17 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC≈16,700 views77 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Posted without readable text

3018🔥15👍10🎉1👌1🤩1🥰1

10 Aug 2026, 16:34 UTC≈10,600 views78 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🇺🇸 JUST IN: Trump Media's crypto losses hit $361 MILLION in the first half of 2026. The Truth Social parent held 9,477 bitcoin worth $557 MILLION at the end of June, per its Q2 filing. Over 6,300 of those coins are pledged as collateral for convertible notes and its options strategy.

😍28👍18🔥17💯112👌1🤩1

5 Aug 2026, 01:40 UTC≈14,300 views86 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🚨 BREAKING: 🇷🇺 RUSSIA CENTRAL BANK JUST APPROVED #BITCOIN AND CRYPTO AS MARGIN COLLATERAL FOR FUTURES AND DERIVATIVES 🪙 BTC CAN NOW BE USED TO BACK LEVERAGED TRADING AND SHORT SELLING GLOBAL SUPERPOWERS ARE RACING TO BTC 🌐 THE RACE IS ON 🚀

🔥282018👍17👌1🤩1🥰1

2 Aug 2026, 01:59 UTC≈13,700 views115 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Posted without readable text

😍48🔥2620💯172👍1🤩1

26 Jul 2026, 01:58 UTC≈16,800 views128 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🔥Never underestimate innovation. 📈Meta turned ~$46.5B into ~$1.53T. 🌍Google grew from ~$207B to ~$3.89T. 💡 In investing, today's underdog can become tomorrow's giant. 🚀

😍5730👍21🔥19👌1

23 Jul 2026, 01:54 UTC≈16,000 views126 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🚨JUST IN:🇨🇳 Chinese company Zhibao Technology plans to purchase $230 million worth of Bitcoin! 💵 💰 Another major corporate Bitcoin treasury move is making headlines. 📈 Institutional adoption continues to gain momentum as companies increase their BTC exposure. 🔥The Bitcoin accumulation race is far from over. ⚡️ #Bitcoin #BTC #Crypto #China #Bullish 🚀💎

🤩53💯3020👍191🎉1👌1🔥1

20 Jul 2026, 01:25 UTC≈18,700 views143 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

⚽️ BITCOIN x FIFA WORLD CUP 💵 📈 From $0.20 in 2010 to over $64,520 in 2026... Bitcoin's journey has been nothing short of legendary. 🚀🔥 Every FIFA World Cup has marked another milestone in Bitcoin's incredible rise. 📊💎 🏆 2010 → 💰 $0.20 🏆 2014 → 💰 $620 🏆 2018 → 💰 $6,500 🏆 2022 → 💰 $16,800 🏆 2026 → 💰 $64,520 🚀 💥 Will the next World Cup witness Bitcoin reaching a new all-time high? 👀 ⚡️ HODL. Believe. Stay Ahead. 🚀

6030😍29👍21👌1🔥1🤩1

19 Jul 2026, 02:08 UTC≈21,400 views127 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

⏳ The Cost of Waiting Every year you wait, Bitcoin gets more expensive. • 2012 — $13 • 2015 — $300 • 2017 — $1,000 • 2019 — $3,500 • 2020 — $10,000 • 2022 — $16,000 • 2026 — $57,800 The biggest risk isn't buying Bitcoin—it's waiting too long. 🚀💴

💯5629👍20🔥191👌1🤩1

16 Jul 2026, 01:16 UTC≈18,500 views155 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🚀 FROM 2000 TO 2026 🌍📈 Every era creates its own legends. 🏆 📱 2000: Bill Gates • Steve Jobs • Warren Buffett 🤖 2026: Elon Musk • Jensen Huang • Mark Zuckerberg ⚡️ Innovation never stops—it only evolves. Who do you think will define the next decade? 👀🚀

😍60🤩58🔥19👍161👌1

14 Jul 2026, 00:37 UTC≈18,400 views159 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

💰 TOP INNOVATORS BY ESTIMATED NET WORTH 🌍🚀 👑 Elon Musk continues to dominate the list with an estimated $886B, followed by Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, Jensen Huang, and the mysterious Satoshi Nakamoto with an estimated ~$68B in Bitcoin. 🪙🔥 📈 Innovation, AI, and Crypto continue to shape the world's biggest fortunes. 🌎💎🚀

58💯38🤩30😍291👌1👍1🔥1

11 Jul 2026, 01:34 UTC≈23,900 views145 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🚀 GLOBAL BUSINESS LEADERS 🌍 💰 Alphabet (Google) dominates as the World's Most Profitable Company with an incredible $195.6B in earnings. 🟢 💎 NVIDIA continues to reign as the World's Most Valuable Company, reaching a massive ~$4.9T market cap. 👥 Walmart remains the World's Biggest Employer, with 2.1 Million employees worldwide. 🛒🌎 🏆 Different companies. Different strengths. One thing in common—global dominance. 🌟📊

40💯40🔥31👍30🎉1🤗1🤩1🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @CryptoMarketIntelHQ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@CryptoMarketIntelHQ edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,043,172 of 1,629,808 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto Market Intel” (@CryptoMarketIntelHQ), 20,558 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoMarketIntelHQ.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.