Channel
@CryptoNetScamm3r
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
—subscribers
| Telegram ID | -1002402451000 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CryptoNetScamm3r |
| Description | The biggest larp on Twitter and the biggest larp in shitcoin chats. Tries to rug. Fails, and blocks when called out. |
| Created | 27 January 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 26 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 0 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CryptoNetScamm3r |
Growth history is still building. We hold no measurements for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
13 posts held, back to 27 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
@ZegentAI - Same scam as @Envoy_Ethereum and @Fusion_ERC20 with a wallet connected to @CryptoNetRunn3r - STAY AWAY https://etherscan.io/address/0x582033efbdc608f12159165964fa9fb467d3af61 Takeshi's second wallet
Photo, posted without a caption
Enjoy larp 😂 😂 I want all your bags sent to 0
CryptoNetScamm3r pinned «https://etherscan.io/address/0xf6ca173de68863fef0e5f6c5e9cbcf4420c4dc5e»
Also, his profits/loss actually take price on Bybit Demo Trading - he mainly uses Binance as his wallet (so does his team of ruggers).
More info: https://t.me/takeshinetScamm3r
Can't speak properly. I'm not racist but he sits in another part of the world and, just like the Fusion/Envoy AI team, and speaks through a translator.
Photo, posted without a caption
Failed at rugging. Proved his FUSION AI AND ENVOY AI RUGS. Now, he can enjoy his loss after aping at the top of Fusion AI for his team
Claims to have 7 figures in AIXBT - loser that can't prove he has 7 figures in AIXBT. All wallet analysis shows is that he transferred this from another wallet where he had bought at 3M market cap
Wallet - only holds 73k of AIXBT
https://etherscan.io/address/0xf6ca173de68863fef0e5f6c5e9cbcf4420c4dc5e
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @CryptoNetScamm3r. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. This entry holds no subscriber measurement yet, so the line below cites the entry itself.
“CryptoNetScamm3r” (@CryptoNetScamm3r). Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoNetScamm3r.
No subscriber measurement is held for this entry yet, so there is no history to download — a download that asserted zero readings would be a false statement, not an empty one.