Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Crypto Pepe

Channel

Crypto Pepe

@CryptoPepez

Not marked by Telegram, checked 3 September 2026

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

347subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 2 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002218238262
TypeChannel
Username@CryptoPepez
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 11 August 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded2 September 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/CryptoPepez

Growth

3472 Sept 2026, 22:46 — 347 subscribers3 Sept 2026, 17:55 — 347 subscribers2 Sept 2026, 22:463 Sept 2026, 17:55
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 346–348 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 17:55347no change
2 Sept 2026, 22:46347first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 August 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2024 to 17 September 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Sept 2024, 18:11 UTC264 viewsread 2 September 2026

⚡️ NEW : Wintermute to launch predictions market called #OutcomeMarket, beginning with TRUMP and HARRIS memecoins.

16 Sept 2024, 18:18 UTC262 viewsread 2 September 2026

🚨🚨 JUST IN: #BlackRock says the Federal Reserve's interest rate cuts will not be as deep as the market expects.

26 Aug 2024, 14:17 UTC307 viewsread 2 September 2026

🚨🚨 JUST IN :🇫🇷 French authorities extend #Telegram CEO Pavel Durov’s detention amid allegations of his app facilitating criminal activities.

20 Aug 2024, 15:01 UTC297 viewsread 2 September 2026

🔥 JUST IN: Ethereum L2 #Base 💰 Surges to Record 4 Million Active Addresses.

20 Aug 2024, 13:22 UTC274 viewsread 2 September 2026

💰 Bitcoin is expected to surge close to all-time highs after the US 🇺🇸 election due to a "pro-liquidity environment," according to Van Eck's Matthew Sigel.

20 Aug 2024, 13:00 UTC230 viewsread 2 September 2026

📊 Market Overview: BTC : $60722 ETH : $2648.19 BNB : $569.37 SOL : $146.0 ⚡️ Dominance : BTC : 53.70 % ETH : 14.27 % Stables : 6.81 % 📈 Market Cap : Total : 2.23T DeFi : 68.22B 24hr Vol : 76.24B

20 Aug 2024, 12:36 UTC167 viewsread 2 September 2026

🔥 Upbit announces new USDT trading pairs for popular memecoins #Brett and #Pepe💰

20 Aug 2024, 12:09 UTC174 viewsread 2 September 2026

⚡️ JUST IN : #Binance🟠 Futures will launch USDⓈ-Margined $BRETT Perpetual Contract at : 🗓 August 20 2024, 10:35 (UTC)

16 Aug 2024, 22:09 UTC191 viewsread 2 September 2026

JUST IN: 💰 Coinbase reports that #Bitcoin ETF inflows during recent price dip signal "promising" new capital interest 🚀

16 Aug 2024, 13:33 UTC207 viewsread 2 September 2026

🇳🇬 Nigerian court freezes $38 million in #cryptocurrency allegedly sent to support protests.

16 Aug 2024, 13:00 UTC197 viewsread 2 September 2026

📊 Market Overview: BTC : $57913 ETH : $2576.99 BNB : $513.3 SOL : $139.36 ⚡️ Dominance : BTC : 53.59 % ETH : 14.53 % Stables : 7.10 % 📈 Market Cap : Total : 2.13T DeFi : 65.45B 24hr Vol : 88.75B

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CryptoPepez. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Kapkap Hub News
@Kapkaphub_ann · 396,858
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 2 September 2026
Haust Network Updates
@haustnetwork · 96,086
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto Pepe” (@CryptoPepez), 347 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoPepez.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.