👑VIP Feedback Our VIP’s keep cutting cash on a constant basis Here’s the most recent reviews from them Want the same for yourself? I bet you do! Contact @albherr to join our VIP group
![Telegram profile photo for Crypto Signals: Futures [FREE]](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/b0/b06261f0b19278882ad35179c4799197fc3d20e060b18f49541ab87250a3544d.jpg)
Channel
Crypto Signals: Futures [FREE]
@CryptoSignalsFutures1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
656subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001509657117 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CryptoSignalsFutures1 |
| Description | 👑 VIP membership 👑 Contact to join: @albherr |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CryptoSignalsFutures1 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 10:23 | 656 | no change |
| 6 Sept 2026, 22:17 | 656 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 27 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.99%
- avg views ÷ 656 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 26.2
- 10 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 10
- of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (27 May 2026 – 6 September 2026) |
| Views total | 262 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Sept 2026, 10:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 429
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
#ARB Doing good as expected + 2,693.12% All TAKE PROFITS achieved✅
#ZEN Doing good as expected + 3,504.81% All TAKE PROFITS achieved✅
#AKE Doing good as expected + 1,438.92% All TAKE PROFITS achieved✅
#BTR Doing good as expected + 3,366.16% All TAKE PROFITS achieved✅
#CRV Doing good as expected + 1,509.48% All TAKE PROFITS achieved✅
#ARB Doing good as expected + 2,067.94% All TAKE PROFITS achieved✅
Crypto Signals: Futures [VIP]📈 Features: - High leverage trades (+50x) - More profit (x30 monthly) - Less time invested - Less risk - Copytrade system already available through Cornix and ByBit Price: 100 usd for 1 month 150 usd for 6 months 200 usd for 12 months For more information: Contact👉@albherr
#FLOCK Doing good as expected + 1,033.12% All TAKE PROFITS achieved✅
#TUT Doing good as expected + 24,918.67% WE MADE IT🚀🚀🚀 One of those signals that pays your vacations✅
#COTI Doing good as expected + 2,244.91% All TAKE PROFITS achieved✅
#IN Doing good as expected + 2,411.49% All TAKE PROFITS achieved✅
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @CryptoSignalsFutures1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@btctradingprofit · 30,795
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Signals: Futures [FREE]” (@CryptoSignalsFutures1), 656 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoSignalsFutures1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.