Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -386. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,687–16,189 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 17:55
15,745
-23
17 Sept 2026, 03:19
15,768
-8
15 Sept 2026, 02:17
15,776
-11
13 Sept 2026, 08:22
15,787
-15
11 Sept 2026, 12:19
15,802
-22
8 Sept 2026, 21:38
15,824
-28
5 Sept 2026, 12:58
15,852
-14
3 Sept 2026, 17:41
15,866
-7
2 Sept 2026, 12:54
15,873
-9
1 Sept 2026, 14:36
15,882
-10
31 Aug 2026, 17:48
15,892
-8
30 Aug 2026, 18:04
15,900
-2
29 Aug 2026, 19:53
15,902
-6
28 Aug 2026, 18:24
15,908
-4
27 Aug 2026, 16:48
15,912
-10
26 Aug 2026, 19:05
15,922
-9
25 Aug 2026, 19:18
15,931
-13
24 Aug 2026, 16:43
15,944
-13
23 Aug 2026, 00:37
15,957
-21
21 Aug 2026, 11:23
15,978
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 22 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.71%
avg views ÷ 15,745 subscribers
Avg views / post
269
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.372%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
25 (22 October 2025 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
269
Reactions total
1
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 10:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
32s
Average length
16s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
108 reactions across 23 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
71
65.7%
👍
13
12.0%
🔥
10
9.26%
😢
7
6.48%
👎
4
3.70%
😁
2
1.85%
🤬
1
0.926%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 108 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 22 October 2025 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🪖 Tech giants warn of an upcoming wave of AI-powered cyberattacks.
OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Microsoft, and over 100 other organizations have signed an open letter calling for urgent cyber defense strengthening.
📊 The companies warn that AI-driven attacks will become far more widespread in the coming months as neural network capabilities continue to grow.
The letter's authors urge governments and businesses to ma…
🤔 Elon Musk's X (Twitter) is reportedly considering paying content monetization rewards in stablecoins.
▪️According to a CoinDesk source, the platform's management is discussing the use of USDC and other stablecoins to reward influencers and content creators.
Negotiations are still ongoing, and X has not officially confirmed this information.
😳 AI has found nearly 8,000 issues in the Bitcoin ecosystem.
The Bitcoin Red Team, using China's Kimi K3 and other AI models, audited 501 projects — wallets, Lightning infrastructure, libraries, payment software, and other open-source projects within the BTC ecosystem.
⚠️The results:
▫️ 7,958 potential issues were found.
▫️ 1,280 were classified as high or critical severity.
▫️ For ~25% of the findings, a working p…
🟢 The first full audit of USDT reserves — a promise nearly 9 years in the making.
Tether's financial audit was conducted by the renowned "Big Four" firm – KPMG.
❗️For context:
Tether had promised a proper audit since at least 2017. Prior to this, only regular reserve attestations from BDO were published — which is a narrower check on a specific date, not a full audit of all financial statements.
✅What the KPMG aud…
#WetDreams #Altcoins
💀 Cryptobros are still hoping for an altseason – a "death cross" has
formed on the BTC.D chart, which in previous cycles preceded powerful rallies.
Vitalik Buterin mengurangi posisinya sebesar 1.694 ETH
Selama dua hari terakhir, Vitalik Buterin telah menjual 1.694 ETH (sekitar $3,31 juta).
Sejak 2 Februari, menurut data, total volume aset yang terjual telah mencapai 8.651 ETH (sekitar $17,97 juta) dengan harga jual rata-rata $2.077.
Saat ini, saldonya tetap 10.676 ETH (sekitar $20,86 juta).
Pergerakan ini mencerminkan fiksasi posisi parsial sambil mempertaha…
CZ: Kurangnya privasi dapat memperlambat adopsi kripto
Changpeng Zhao mengatakan bahwa transparansi on-chain yang berlebihan dapat menghambat penggunaan kripto untuk pembayaran sehari-hari.
Ia mencatat bahwa jika sebuah perusahaan membayar gaji langsung di on-chain, siapa pun dapat memeriksa alamat pengirim dan melihat berapa penghasilan setiap karyawan. Menurut CZ, tingkat visibilitas ini dapat menjadi penghalang …
Salah satu pendiri Multicoin Capital mengkritik keras Hyperliquid
Menurut Kyle Samani, Hyperliquid memusatkan berbagai masalah sistemik industri kripto dan menunjukkan seperti apa produk terdesentralisasi seharusnya tidak dibangun.
🟠 Pendiri proyek terpaksa meninggalkan negaranya untuk dapat melanjutkan pengembangan
🟠 Platform tersebut, menurut para kritikus, digunakan dalam skema yang terkait dengan aktivitas krim…
Strategy masuk ke kerugian belum terealisasi pada BTC
Bitcoin turun ke sekitar $75.000, membuat posisi Strategy menjadi rugi di atas kertas sekitar $900 juta. Perusahaan milik Michael Saylor memegang 712.647 BTC senilai sekitar $53,6 miliar dengan harga masuk rata-rata $76.037, sehingga pergerakan pasar saat ini sementara mendorong neraca ke zona negatif.
📺Crypto TV📺
Jepang sedang menyiapkan landasan untuk peluncuran ETF kripto
Regulator keuangan Jepang sedang mempertimbangkan kemungkinan memasukkan mata uang kripto ke dalam daftar aset yang diizinkan untuk ETF mulai tahun 2028. Inisiatif ini bertujuan untuk memformalkan pasar dan memperkuat perlindungan investor dalam kerangka sistem keuangan tradisional.
Di antara calon penerbit pertama disebutkan Nomura Holdings dan SBI Hold…
Transaksi harian di jaringan Ethereum mencapai rekor 2,5 juta, sementara biaya gas rata-rata turun ke level terendah sepanjang sejarah — $0,15.
📺Crypto TV📺
Changpeng Zhao: Saya mungkin salah, tetapi supercycle sudah hampir tiba.
📺Crypto TV📺
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @CryptoTV_in. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto TV 🇮🇩” (@CryptoTV_in), 15,745 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoTV_in.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.