Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
55 measurements spanning 84 days, net +4,730. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 89,085–96,841 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 55
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Oct 2026, 21:00
95,032
-71
27 Oct 2026, 22:55
95,103
-79
27 Oct 2026, 00:39
95,182
-65
26 Oct 2026, 02:18
95,247
+542
25 Oct 2026, 00:58
94,705
-39
24 Oct 2026, 02:20
94,744
-85
23 Oct 2026, 01:10
94,829
-81
21 Oct 2026, 23:20
94,910
-166
20 Oct 2026, 17:44
95,076
-134
19 Oct 2026, 14:55
95,210
-106
18 Oct 2026, 14:07
95,316
-84
17 Oct 2026, 12:16
95,400
-136
16 Oct 2026, 10:56
95,536
-100
15 Oct 2026, 13:37
95,636
-109
14 Oct 2026, 13:28
95,745
-201
13 Oct 2026, 04:07
95,946
+213
8 Oct 2026, 22:15
95,733
+317
4 Oct 2026, 14:17
95,416
+1,421
26 Sept 2026, 07:00
93,995
+661
19 Sept 2026, 09:00
93,334
first reading
Engagement
122 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 170 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.46%
avg views ÷ 95,032 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,240
42 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
42
of 122 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 October 2026
Posts held
122 (28 July 2026 – 28 October 2026)
Views total
178,019
Reactions total
3,040
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Oct 2026, 17:55 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 48s
Average length
17s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,692 reactions across 121 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4,377
50.4%
⚡
1,993
22.9%
👍
494
5.68%
🎃
481
5.53%
🌚
340
3.91%
👻
315
3.62%
❤🔥
167
1.92%
🍾
109
1.25%
🌭
84
0.966%
🔥
73
0.84%
🍓
50
0.575%
😁
29
0.334%
🤔
29
0.334%
🤣
29
0.334%
🕊
20
0.23%
🤯
20
0.23%
👏
17
0.196%
🥴
17
0.196%
😈
11
0.127%
🏆
9
0.104%
6 further kinds
28
0.322%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 121 of the 122 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,692 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 122 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 28 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
521
across the posts below
Posts paid on
51
of 121 we hold a reading for · 42%
Most on one post
105
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @CryptoTabChannel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 122 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 28 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
The shares total 129%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
I'm ready for a Halloween makeover - and I want your voice to decide! 🎃
Everyone loves dressing up on Halloween Eve - me too!
Who should I become?
🧙♀️ A mysterious Witch!
🧛♂️ A classic Dracula!
👻 A spooky Ghost!
You choose which look I should try next.
Vote in the poll below & see me next week in the costume chosen by community! 👇
🎃 You're invited to the BTC Halloween Party!
Halloween Hunt is going great — monsters are falling, prizes are flying! 👻
Time to celebrate. So we're throwing a party in CryptoCity!
📌 Here's the deal:
— Message me ✉️
— Send your photo 📸
— Describe your costume 🎃
That's it — the final guest list is up to me 😉
📅 October 27 – November 3
🎭 Dress code: Haunted, hyped or HODLing from beyond the grave
Nobody on the fi…
🎃👻 Spooky Duel: Week 2 Results
What a week! The Pumpkins keep the crown — but this time the Ghosts made them sweat 👀
Final score:
🎃 Pumpkins — 219 reactions
👻 Ghosts — 142 reactions
The gap is shrinking fast: the Ghosts won the Halloween makeover post and tied the weekend game post!
Prizes
🏆 5 Gift Miners (1000 h/s) go to 5 lucky members of the winning team:
🎃 @SunilNayak69
🎃 محمد ريسان علي حسين الحميدي
🎃@ABC41…
🎃 Watch Ads & Win a Share of 100M H/S!
We're turning your daily app time into real rewards!
📌 Here's the deal:
• Open the CT Pool app
• Head to the ad section
• Keep your in-app watching streak going for 7 days straight
That's it - you're in the draw!
The prize: 100,000,000 H/S, split among 100 winners! 🚀
Watch ads, keep the streak alive, and let the rewards come to you!
💸 CT Pool
HUNGRY AGAIN 🌸
Week 2 of Spooky Duel is in full swing, and Jack and Boo are asking for food again. In Spooky Duel pets grow only when they're fed, so every reaction counts.
How to feed your pet:
🎃 👻 React to our posts. Every reaction is XP for your team's pet (💖 doesn't count). The team with more reactions this week wins.
💬 Comment. Comments, not reactions, make you an Active Captain: the 3 most active commenters…
New weekend, new game 🎯
We've rolled dice. We've bowled — twice. Now let's see how good your aim is 😏
Rules:
— Throw 🎯 in the comments under this post. Send the emoji on its own, nothing else.
— Hit the BULLSEYE (dead center) to get a chance to win 200 HSH.
— A new winner is picked every 8 hours👀
Schedule:
Oct 23
— 16:00–24:00 UTC · 🎁 1 winner
Oct 24
— 00:00–08:00 UTC · 🎁 1 winner
— 08:00–16:00 UTC · 🎁 1 winner
— …
And the Birthday Winners Are… 🎉
Candles out, piñata cracked - the CryptoTab Birthday bash is officially over!
💰 10 lucky participants shared the prize pool of 8 028 061 HSH! 💰
Congratulations to our winners — check your IDs below:
🎁 35826446
🎁 49200299
🎁 49569945
🎁 48554661
🎁 48659831
🎁 49839573
🎁 45864930
🎁 40970854
🎁 39870911
🎁 24525590
📧 Please check your email to see if you're one of them!
But the …
I'm back with a Halloween makeover! 🎃
You all know about our cool promo, right?
Check video for details on what's happening and how to join!
👻 Join Halloween Hunt
Still alive? Good. 🧙♀️
You've ventured deeper into my forest, where the monsters aren't so friendly anymore.
How to keep going:
🎃 Use your Pump-Bombs to hit monsters and snag marvelous prizes!
✨ Complete Quests, earn Spells to decide the monsters' fate, and gain powerful boosts!
... But are you skilled enough to survive the hunt?
The forest is growing darker. So are my monsters. 🕷
🌲 Enter the Witch Forest
Did you live through any of these crashes? 📉
Bitcoin, the top global crypto, has seen many ups and downs. Here are the biggest ones.
What phase of the cycle are we in now? Comment below!
💸 CT Pool
🎃👻 Spooky Duel: Week 1 Results
The first week is over, and the Pumpkins take it! 🎃
Final score:
🎃 Pumpkins — 167 reactions
👻 Ghosts — 85 reactions
Prizes
🏆 5 Gift Miners (1000 h/s) go to 5 lucky members of the winning team:
🎃 William
🎃 @nxp26
🎃 @Spentmen
🎃 @Joraethis
🎃 @dimitrasklavaki
🎁 Active Captains of the week — 400 HSH each:
🎃 @Beliak_l
🎃 @amirsnia
🎃 @UnknownNL023
Congrats, winners! 🎉
DM @ctgiveaway to cla…
🎃36👻22❤20
Showing the 12 most recent of 122 posts we hold for @CryptoTabChannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@CryptoTabChannel edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
28 August 2026
Most recent edit
22 October 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 129%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 122 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 28 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CryptoTab” (@CryptoTabChannel), 95,032 subscribers as measured 28 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoTabChannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.