Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Crypto Worker's Gems πŸ’Ž

Channel

Crypto Worker's Gems πŸ’Ž

@Crypto_Worker_Call

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry

5,053subscribers

-427 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001850141782
TypeChannel
Username@Crypto_Worker_Call
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Crypto_Worker_Call

Growth

5,0535,4805,266.57 August 2026 β€” 5,480 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 5,480 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 5,429 subscribers14 August 2026 β€” 5,376 subscribers17 August 2026 β€” 5,343 subscribers20 August 2026 β€” 5,295 subscribers24 August 2026 β€” 5,266 subscribers27 August 2026 β€” 5,233 subscribers30 August 2026 β€” 5,179 subscribers2 September 2026 β€” 5,123 subscribers6 September 2026 β€” 5,053 subscribers7 August 20266 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 30 days, net -427. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,989–5,544 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 16:175,053-70
2 Sept 2026, 06:375,123-56
30 Aug 2026, 16:235,179-54
27 Aug 2026, 21:255,233-33
24 Aug 2026, 11:275,266-29
20 Aug 2026, 19:225,295-48
17 Aug 2026, 13:545,343-33
14 Aug 2026, 07:045,376-53
10 Aug 2026, 17:225,429-51
7 Aug 2026, 11:165,480no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:095,480first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

273 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
πŸ”₯12846.9%
πŸ‘11441.8%
❀‍πŸ”₯82.93%
πŸ‘Œ82.93%
πŸ’―41.47%
πŸ™41.47%
🫑31.10%
πŸ†20.733%
πŸ‘€10.366%
😍10.366%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 273 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 12:39 UTC854 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026

This launch will yield at least a 20x return; it will launch on the Solana network and Robinhood.

πŸ‘10πŸ”₯4πŸ‘Œ2πŸ†1πŸ™1

24 Jul 2026, 12:36 UTCβ‰ˆ1,110 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Private presale; the previous one yielded a 27x return. Min 0.5SOL Max 5 Sol Launch is tomorrow. Dm me: @Purosangue_W

πŸ‘6πŸ”₯5πŸ‘Œ1

19 Jul 2026, 11:36 UTC901 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Gm gm

πŸ‘6πŸ”₯6❀‍πŸ”₯3πŸ‘Œ2

13 Jul 2026, 17:57 UTC938 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

$HOPPY πŸ”₯RHB πŸ”₯50x 5m , now 3.6m Yes, we have just been posted in the original Pepe portal. βœ‰οΈ https://t.me/+5jFQBb_5wIIxNzdk πŸ“ˆ https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x60E50467D9ffA04a08C2720E859ff1DdCB09C36E Ca : 0x834b31164b5e5F4a08B441D796aBB85f714bb7C1

πŸ‘8πŸ”₯4

12 Jul 2026, 22:36 UTC881 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Shiba is promoting $HOPPY; this could be huge πŸ‘€πŸ‘€πŸ‘€

πŸ”₯7πŸ‘4πŸ‘Œ2πŸ†1

12 Jul 2026, 22:36 UTC886 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://x.com/shibtoken/status/2076434159497596984

πŸ‘8πŸ”₯4πŸ’―1😍1

12 Jul 2026, 20:08 UTC883 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

HOPPY Buy! 🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸

πŸ‘8πŸ”₯4πŸ™1

12 Jul 2026, 19:57 UTC816 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

HOPPY Buy! 🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸

πŸ”₯8πŸ‘2❀‍πŸ”₯1

12 Jul 2026, 15:52 UTC792 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

$HOPPY πŸ”₯RHB πŸ”₯13x, and it keeps growing. βœ‰οΈ https://t.me/+5jFQBb_5wIIxNzdk πŸ“ˆ https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x60E50467D9ffA04a08C2720E859ff1DdCB09C36E Ca : 0x834b31164b5e5F4a08B441D796aBB85f714bb7C1

πŸ”₯8πŸ‘5❀‍πŸ”₯1πŸ’―1

12 Jul 2026, 15:50 UTC775 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

HOPPY Buy! 🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸 πŸ’° 0.70 ETH ($1,274.78) πŸͺ™ 957,382 HOPPY 🏷️ Price: $0.001362 πŸ”Ό Mkt Cap: $1,362,057 πŸ’§ Liquidity: $100,573.95 πŸ” 0x63c2...0846 ⬆️ Position: +60.37%! Tx | Cha

πŸ‘5πŸ”₯5❀‍πŸ”₯1

12 Jul 2026, 09:22 UTC797 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Gm

πŸ”₯10πŸ‘2πŸ‘€1πŸ‘Œ1πŸ™1

11 Jul 2026, 21:12 UTC840 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Update : $FOX πŸ”₯RobinHoodπŸ”₯4x 771k NEW ATH LFGGGG 🌐 https://robinhoodfox.com βœ‰οΈ https://t.me/fox_rh ❌ https://x.com/fox_onrh Ca: 0x2103faA9D1762e27a716C61718b3aCf3Ec1F9bf1

πŸ‘7πŸ”₯6πŸ™1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Crypto_Worker_Call. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Gogeta Crypto Chad$
@gogetacalls Β· 48,578
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 78 here β€” alongside 77 others β€” read 30 August 2026
Maybach Calls
@MaybachCalls Β· 30,566
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 77 here β€” alongside 76 others β€” read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one β€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œCrypto Worker's Gems πŸ’Žβ€ (@Crypto_Worker_Call), 5,053 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Crypto_Worker_Call.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.