Channel
@Cryptoboss_1984
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,462subscribers
-104 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001363500849 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Cryptoboss_1984 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Cryptoboss_1984 |
Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 20:19 | 5,462 | -9 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:57 | 5,471 | -12 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 21:57 | 5,483 | -22 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:13 | 5,505 | -10 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 5,515 | -8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 5,523 | -6 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:49 | 5,529 | -10 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:23 | 5,539 | -15 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:58 | 5,554 | +16 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 04:38 | 5,538 | -12 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:32 | 5,550 | -12 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:41 | 5,562 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:45 | 5,566 | first reading |
35 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 35 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
109 reactions across 27 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 54 | 49.5% | |
| 🔥 | 32 | 29.4% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 15.6% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 4.59% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.917% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 109 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
I’ve officially teamed up with Breakoutprop, the best crypto prop firm in the game. To celebrate, I’m giving 100$ to 3 users. To enter: 1. Get any evaluation using my code CRYPTOBOSS. 2. Send me your purchase proof in tg @Just_The_King20 Winners announced in 3 days :)) breakoutprop.com
🔥2
use code CRYPTOBOSS and you will get a good discount
🔥2
This is a prop firm evaluation test where you pay a small fee to prove you can trade safely before getting funded. Here is how the process works in 3 simple steps: 1. Pay the Fee You buy an evaluation account (for example, a $5,000 wallet size). Classic ($45): Easiest to pass because it gives you the most safety room. Pro ($33): Balanced price and rules. Turbo ($20): Lowest fee, but strict rules with very little room…
❤1
breakoutprop.com
use code CRYPTOBOSS and you will get a good discount
🔥2
Super excited to announce my partnership with@breakoutprop Prop firms get a bad rep — and honestly, for good reason. But when I saw Breakout was backed by@krakenfx and expanding into more RWA assets, I decided to give it a shot. I look at prop trading as a way to maximize upside while keeping downside limited, and Breakout has some of the best rules I've seen: No hidden fees No payout cycles Trader-first platform Ove…
❤1
$PUMP Update: TP1 SMASHED First target hit cleanly! Setup score upgraded to 87% A+ with ELITE flow (81% TQI). Entry: 0.002690 Stop Loss: Move to Breakeven Status: TP1 (0.002884): HIT TP2: 0.003045 TP3: 0.003239 Progress: 33% Complete Power: 79% Strong · Trending Secure initial profits and trail stops! razoralpha.io
🔥2❤1
Everyone should have a bag of $HYPE and $PUMP before the end of the year
Higher for $PUMP
$LQTY buying here
🔥5
PUMP Update: ALL TARGETS SMASHED 🎯🔥 Target 3 hit! Full move completed cleanly for +12.92% gain from entry. 🔹 Entry: 0.002333 🔹 Stop Loss: 0.002196 Status: ✅ TP1 (0.002429): HIT ✅ TP2 (0.002525): HIT ✅ TP3 (0.002634): HIT 📊 Progress: 100% Complete ⚡️ Gain: +12.92% Congrats to everyone who took this trade! Secure profits and trail stops. 💰 More to come....
❤6
https://x.com/CryptoBoss1984/status/2085718576896344149
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @Cryptoboss_1984. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cryptoboss Channel” (@Cryptoboss_1984), 5,462 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Cryptoboss_1984.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.