Channel
@CryptoholicGems
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
14,929subscribers
-3,907 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001471102902 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CryptoholicGems |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 50 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CryptoholicGems |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Oct 2026, 22:27 | 14,929 | -43 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 20:08 | 14,972 | -46 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 23:27 | 15,018 | -50 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 22:08 | 15,068 | -80 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 19:59 | 15,148 | -133 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 13:38 | 15,281 | -133 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 12:11 | 15,414 | -188 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 09:44 | 15,602 | -138 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 09:20 | 15,740 | -352 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 08:58 | 16,092 | -338 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 12:15 | 16,430 | -500 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 14:38 | 16,930 | -936 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 03:27 | 17,866 | -1,825 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 17:57 | 19,691 | +9,380 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 10:00 | 10,311 | -875 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 17:40 | 11,186 | -118 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 03:38 | 11,304 | -37 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 17:59 | 11,341 | -25 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 19:55 | 11,366 | -28 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 09:42 | 11,394 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 6 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Check $MEAD Everyone missing this. OZZY username is @MEADGod MEAD is a Stable coin created by OZZY through ROOTSFI protocol. Ca : 0xa951cEDE6761b80426d661b8934FF7D109ae3Bed Don't miss another good lore. Founder of @ponsdotfamily itself have MEAD in his username https://x.com/i/communities/2037770954445819965
First Cult coin on Robinhood They spent 2 years building a cult on solana They relaunch on Robinhood after 2 years Sol ath was 1 million Ca : 0x73394A8FD379989d97f2DDce58A45c4D5ea79d6e
Good news everyone QUANT CTO Team developed a Mini game 🏹 RUGSHOT BETA IS LIVE 🤖 @QuanttestRHBot 🎯 Conquer 25 levels 💥 Build massive destruction combos🏆 Compete on the leaderboard 🔐 Activate your integrated Robinhood Chain wallet with Authenticator. This is just the beginning. New levels are coming soon. Ca : 0x09f9203b4c83b62f769c6f8e0c2f57bcbe35b24 Tg : https://t.me/Quantctoapestore X : https://x.com/i/comm…
Grab some PONS plays . PONS at 10 million Suggesting you some plays on PONS 1. $OZZY (PONS DEV NAME ) - 0x448ce6f7AFEe5568D89997C0D76E1247BA40F231 2. $ROOTS( PONS DEV CORE COMPANY )- 0xfa55571d569b2a4a05f46c2062d8477bea1f5983 3. $JEFF (PONS DEV INSPIRATION GUY)- 0x1b3090d67e744cD5381DF821768fC576F6C65b39
Photo, posted without a caption
Proof 2
Check $GOLDLATTICE https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0xf94464f697460c493fdb7cb2c6072593aff2e017 0xD1f10cA2426DB0fAF4eCc7775C66bD3e27B3bcA0 Robinhood older name - $CASHCAT Robinhood chain older name - $Goldlattice
Proof 1
Robinhood chain is going crazy $CASHCAT hits 200 million. https://t.me/based_eth_bot?start=r_draco Use this bot it bridges any chain to Robinhood in seconds
Check $DEXBULL CA : 6xCtR2Eq1VumsoRdNutcfSQfLMk7xUa2BrMx18tqpump OFFICIAL TOKEN BY DEXBULL TEAM https://x.com/i/status/2074863923417760251
#SPX/USDT All targets achieved 😎 Profit: 327.0553% 📈 Period: 2 months 7 days ⏰
#TST/USDT All targets achieved 😎 Profit: 393.9394% 📈 Period: 4 months 4 days ⏰
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @CryptoholicGems. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cryptoholic Alpha Calls” (@CryptoholicGems), 14,929 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoholicGems.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.